""He" who? Motta or Crowley?"

It was Motta. And thanks for the clarification Jim.

"Yeah, B-C is my take as well."

I should clarify (sicne I sorta started this) that we are only talking about the feel of the documents - where they would be classified if they had actually been classified. But the comment wasn't classified. It has no class.

"Although, I think "The Comment" is Class A"

One modern Crowley scholar started that labelling. Crowley didn't. It also has no class.

"and in Equinox V no. 1 (with Motta's commentary) Motta states that Crowley's commentary in that text he lists officially as class B."

"He" who? Motta or Crowley? (I'm not remembering any reference where Crowley categorized it.)

See Appendix E in The Mystical & Magical System of the A.'.A.'. for the most complete and accurate catalogue of classified documents known to me.

"
@Almighty Creator said
"Is comment D officially listed as Class B or Class A"

The copy of D I have is unclassified. Offhand, I can't recall any of the commentaries being classified. (They seem to me to be in the Class C vein, occasionally wandering B-ish - but they weren't really ranked.)"

C would seem an accurate designation.

"Is comment D officially listed as Class B or Class A"

The copy of D I have is unclassified. Offhand, I can't recall any of the commentaries being classified. (They seem to me to be in the Class C vein, occasionally wandering B-ish - but they weren't really ranked.)

Dan

@Almighty Creator said

"Is comment D officially listed as Class B or Class A"