For all his wondrous ingenuity, however, Crowley was (in my own slightly haughty opinion ) a bit arrogant and close-minded in [some of] his views. I suppose this may be approaching heresy to claim on a Thelemic board, but if there is one thing my own approach and studies in the occult have reaped me, its the notion of analogue ambiguity, and nothing can be quite so black-and-white as to be deemed "incorrect".

Who knows, those pesky Adepts of old were known to spew a load of plainly wrong shit into public hands in their efforts of secrecy; I guess its a question of just how ancient and attribution it really is. I suppose only comparative meditation will yield an acceptable answer to me, and I do appreciate your reference.

Tzaddi is not the Star