<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA["General Principles of Astrology" for Sidereal Astrologers?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Just hoping to solicit opinions from some of you Siderealists out there on what you think the value of Crowley and Adams' <em>The General Principles of Astrology</em> is for those working within the Sidereal system. I picked up the book before I discovered and became more or less convinced by the Sidereal system, and haven't picked it up since.</p>
<p dir="auto">As I understand it, the more a Tropical astrologer bases her work on oberservation, the more adjustment will be necessary, since she will primarily be talking about the previous sign (i.e., a Tropacalist observing a "Leo" is--5 times out of 6, or thereabouts--actually observing a Cancer, and so on). How much does Crowley's work suffer from this issue? What sort of adjustments would need to be made while studying it?</p>
<p dir="auto">The book looked quite promising and there are few authors I'd rather study the work of (plus, I shelled out a good chunk of cash for it!), so it'd be a shame if the book didn't turn out all that useful...</p>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/topic/17057/general-principles-of-astrology-for-sidereal-astrologers</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 21:42:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thelema.org/forum/topic/17057.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:44:37 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to "General Principles of Astrology" for Sidereal Astrologers? on Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:11:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">@Iamus said</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">" Didn't see the glossary, I'll have to go back and take a look."</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">here it is <a href="http://solunars.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=1457" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">solunars.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&amp;t=1457</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/post/92174</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://thelema.org/forum/post/92174</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danica]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:11:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to "General Principles of Astrology" for Sidereal Astrologers? on Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:00:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Iamus, regarding Crowley's book, in addition to what Jim has already said about A.C.'s observations on signs, I think it has good info about Neptune and Uranus angular - but he does not call them 'angular' as such, and the description is in the sections when he speaks about <em>Neptune and Uranus in the 1st House</em>. I find his descriptions of Uranus or Neptune in the 1st house accurate for angularity of those planets, regardless the particular angle.</p>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/post/92173</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://thelema.org/forum/post/92173</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danica]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:00:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to "General Principles of Astrology" for Sidereal Astrologers? on Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:47:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Almost everything you need (except calculation instructions - which are mostly done by computer these days) is on &lt;!-- w --&gt;&lt;a class="postlink" href="<a href="http://www.solunars.net" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">http://www.solunars.net</a>"&gt;<a href="http://www.solunars.net" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">www.solunars.net</a>&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!-- w --&gt;.</p>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/post/92164</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://thelema.org/forum/post/92164</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Eshelman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:47:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to "General Principles of Astrology" for Sidereal Astrologers? on Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:38:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Thanks, Jim. I just picked up a used copy of your <em>New Instant Astrologer</em>. Any other recommendations for a magician with a basic grasp of Tropical Astrology just starting out with Sidereal?</p>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/post/92163</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://thelema.org/forum/post/92163</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[_____]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 21:38:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to "General Principles of Astrology" for Sidereal Astrologers? on Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:50:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Crowley's astrological writings are a mixed bag. You almost have to be an experienced senior astrologer to sort through it.</p>
<p dir="auto">Regarding interpretations, Crowley was an astute witness of character. So, when he wrote about Tropical Capricorn, it's usually at least 3/4 accurate for Sidereal Sagittarius - the thing he was actually lookng at. With a little discrimination and artfullness, you can get valuable insights from reading him "one sign back" that way, leaving out those places where he's obviously just playing to the Tropical sign-rulers. (E.g., read his Sun in Libra as a potential interpretation of Sideral Virgo, but leave out anything specifically playing to Venus symbolism, which is there just as theory.)</p>
<p dir="auto">Some of his other concepts are insightful and original contributions, but, again, you need already to be pretty experienced to reasonably sort through those.</p>
<p dir="auto">BTW, I don't have that book - wasn't going to spend the money for something that would be, to me, worthless. I have all of the original "Adams" books, and some of Crowleys private papers, including his copies of a large number of horoscopes he did for people around him.</p>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/post/92132</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://thelema.org/forum/post/92132</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Eshelman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:50:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to "General Principles of Astrology" for Sidereal Astrologers? on Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:37:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/forum/user/danica" aria-label="Profile: danica">@<bdi>danica</bdi></a> said</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">"<br />
@Iamus said<br />
"<br />
The book looked quite promising and there are few authors I'd rather study the work of (plus, I shelled out a good chunk of cash for it!), so it'd be a shame if the book didn't turn out all that useful..."</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I didn't sell my own copy of it along with others Tropical books just because it's A.C.'s and I so very much love him as an author in general regardless of our disagreement over some specific topics  <img src="https://thelema.org/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f600.png?v=81c41aa6baf" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--grinning" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":grinning:" alt="😀" /> "<br />
Care to elaborate? Have you found the work useful in your sidereal work?</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">"<a href="http://solunars.net" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">solunars.net</a> forum has everything you need to start - and continue - working with Sidereal Astrology, and now even more so, since Jim added the section "Astrology glossary""<br />
Yes, I'd encountered this site a while back when I was first researching sidereal astrology. Didn't see the glossary, I'll have to go back and take a look.</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I was considering reading Crowley side by side with Jim's material.</p>
<p dir="auto">If not many people have looked at this work from a sidereal perspective, maybe I'll have something to report once I've done some work...</p>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/post/92131</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://thelema.org/forum/post/92131</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[_____]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2012 18:37:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to "General Principles of Astrology" for Sidereal Astrologers? on Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:43:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">@Iamus said</p>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">"<br />
The book looked quite promising and there are few authors I'd rather study the work of (plus, I shelled out a good chunk of cash for it!), so it'd be a shame if the book didn't turn out all that useful..."</p>
</blockquote>
<p dir="auto">I didn't sell my own copy of it along with others Tropical books just because it's A.C.'s and I so very much love him as an author in general regardless of our disagreement over some specific topics  <img src="https://thelema.org/forum/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f600.png?v=81c41aa6baf" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--grinning" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":grinning:" alt="😀" /></p>
<p dir="auto"><a href="http://solunars.net" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow ugc">solunars.net</a> forum has everything you need to start - and continue - working with Sidereal Astrology, and now even more so, since Jim added the section "Astrology glossary"</p>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/post/92125</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://thelema.org/forum/post/92125</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danica]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:43:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>