<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[12&#x2F;31&#x2F;17 - (Hadit) Liber L., Cap. II, v. 57]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p dir="auto"><em>57. He that is righteous shall be righteous still; he that is filthy shall be filthy still.</em></p>
</blockquote>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/topic/19245/12-31-17-hadit-liber-l-cap-ii-v-57</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 05:54:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thelema.org/forum/topic/19245.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2017 19:51:51 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 12&#x2F;31&#x2F;17 - (Hadit) Liber L., Cap. II, v. 57 on Sun, 31 Dec 2017 20:01:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">It feels counter-intuitive for me to interpret this verse in the sense of "righteous" and "filthy" as moral categories. I feel the indication is, rather, that each individual star (i.e. point-of-consciousness) has its essential characteristics (properties of its nature) which are not subject to change - for if they were, that would not be the particular individual point-of-consciousness any more, but something else.</p>
]]></description><link>https://thelema.org/forum/post/105792</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://thelema.org/forum/post/105792</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Danica]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2017 20:01:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>