The role of the Qlippoth in Thelema
-
93,
No, I don't think a black hole offers a valid comparison. The teaching is saying the darkness is the light.
I'd say this is one of those concepts that comes clearer the less we try to get a rational grasp of it through analogies and analysis. I can only suggest, as a meditative exercise, than you accept the idea, then see if it communicates anything to you. I've never come up with a good analogy myself, so this seems a better approach.
93 93/93,
Edward
-
@he atlas itch said
"Is your method Typhonian?"
Not in the sense that I am a member of the Typhonian Order. I work with the Qliphothic Qabalah. Member of the Dragon Rouge.
Edward: It might not be really possible to find an anology to it. NOX is way beyond the sphere of Hod..
-
Paroketh is also an abyss.
-
93,
Atlantis wrote:"Paroketh is also an abyss."
With a lower-case 'a' yes, I might agree with you, though I think we need to keep clear the difference between Paroketh and 'the' Abyss. To come through Paroketh is not to lose the sense of separate selfhood, however much it might be 'modified' by the experience.
"It might not be really possible to find an anology to it. NOX is way beyond the sphere of Hod.."
For sure. Though I don't think it's just a matter of its being beyond Hod, but rather, it being a concept or experience or reality that can't be appreciated even by Yetziratic consciousness, let alone the conventional consciousness of Assiah. It would only make some sense to a person who had opened to a Briatic state. Which is the reason NOX is the work of the Adepti, and mostly of advanced ones, at that.
It's a bit like someone from 7,000 years ago trying (and here I am, analogizing) to use a flint knife to unscrew a door-handle. Until you have direct experience of purpose-designed screwdrivers, the idea of the screws and their manner of gripping the wood of the door is beyond your ability to appreciate.
Liber LXV, I, 11:
"Nor is it fitting for the cobbler to prate of the Royal matter. O cobbler! mend me this shoe, that I may walk. O king! if I be thy son, let us speak of the Embassy to the King thy Brother."
93 93/93,
Edward
-
Alrah, 93,
"Those high adepti are not so high. They are infact, the lowest of the low. No baser human being walks upon the earth than they. No animal, nor worm nor creeping ameoba, nor deadly virus ranks lower than they are. "
Are you being literal, or trying to make some kind of Zen point here?
93 93/93,
Edward
-
@Edward Mason said
"With a lower-case 'a' yes, I might agree with you, though I think we need to keep clear the difference between Paroketh and 'the' Abyss. To come through Paroketh is not to lose the sense of separate selfhood, however much it might be 'modified' by the experience."
It depends on what we mean with separate selfhood. We could mean alot by that. In the Qliphothic Qabalah, Paroketh is highly worked with. It is an important and groundbreaking step in the initiation. It is not really only about ego-loss, because one has had so many ego-losses before this. Paroketh is quite special.
@Edward Mason said
"For sure. Though I don't think it's just a matter of its being beyond Hod, but rather, it being a concept or experience or reality that can't be appreciated even by Yetziratic consciousness, let alone the conventional consciousness of Assiah. It would only make some sense to a person who had opened to a Briatic state. Which is the reason NOX is the work of the Adepti, and mostly of advanced ones, at that."
Concepts reside in Hod. It is one thing to understand something (understanding can be done without Hod), another to formulate it. I was talking about formulation, without saying anything about the understanding.
Things that are way too dislocated from Hod tends to be difficult to talk about. -
Atlantis 93,
"Concepts reside in Hod. It is one thing to understand something (understanding can be done without Hod), another to formulate it. I was talking about formulation, without saying anything about the understanding.
Things that are way too dislocated from Hod tends to be difficult to talk about."At the risk of hair-splitting, I'd say *conceptualizing *lies in Hod. All the sephiroth include concepts.
Your other comments, I generally agree with.
93 93/93,
Edward
-
@Edward Mason said
"Isn't that a psychological quest?"
Right. I just don't approach it that way. I take what could be called the "intuitive" approach. I feel no need to analyze my relationship to the Divine. Why ruin a good thing? ("When power asks why, then is power weakness.")
"Much of Qabalah is a form of psychology."
Right again. So is Astrology. In fact, I find the Astrological/Qabalistic approach much more lucid than Jungian psychoanalysis--but that is me, and to each his own.
93
-
JPF 93,
"In fact, I find the Astrological/Qabalistic approach much more lucid than Jungian psychoanalysis--but that is me, and to each his own.
"Me too. Sometimes, though, old CGJ is worth checking out.
93 93/93,
Edward
-
@Alias55A said
"Jim' , you said in one of the links above that "we all have to deal with lilith in malkuth"? explain?"
Check out Liber LXV for an explanation of that one...
-
@frateruranus said
"
@Alias55A said
"Jim' , you said in one of the links above that "we all have to deal with lilith in malkuth"? explain?"Check out Liber LXV for an explanation of that one..."
I never found what quote you meant... but, reading this today, I think I might have meant the following:
@Liber 24 said
"It is even said that to every Neophyte of the Order of A.'.A.'. appeareth a demon in the form of a woman to pervert him; within Our own knowledge have not less than nine brethren been utterly cast out thereby."
@Confessions said
"I believed then, and believe now, that. . . the neophyte is nearly always tempted by a woman."
Under the title, "The Ordeal of the Nephesh" in M&MAA, I wrote:
"Related to the awakening powers of astral per-ception, and those personal energies that accompany their awakening, are certain ordeals, common enough for Crowley to have issued special warnings... A few comments are warranted here.
First, in our experience and observation, this is a reasonable warning.
Second, despite the sexist and heterosexist phrasing of Crowley’s remarks (possibly due, in this instance, to his having observed the phenomenon only with male Neophytes and in this form), the ordeal is as likely to appear to female Neophytes as to males, and is by no means limited to heterosexuals.
Third, the real demon with which the Neophyte struggles is within. However, this does not prevent the ordeal from manifesting as an outward projection onto an individual in the environment, if the real inner battle is not fought and won."