Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • AโˆดAโˆด
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

Thelemic Materialism (Thelemic Philosophy)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Thelema
200 Posts 19 Posters 54.6k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • O oldfriend56

    A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

    One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

    Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

    There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

    This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

    Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
    .
    Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

    This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

    As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

    This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

    What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

    The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

    Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

    Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

    Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

    So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

    And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

    Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Los
    wrote on last edited by
    #140

    @Avshalom Binyamin said

    "the tests [...] perform better than possible by chance."

    Yeah sure, whatever you say, buddy.

    One of my favorite mockeries of this kind of nonsense was written by Robert Todd Carroll in his article "What if Dean Radin's Right?" [Radin being a wackaloo who supports this kind of nonsense, of course]

    A few choice excerpts that sum up my feelings on the subject as well:

    @Robert Todd Carroll said

    "The evidence Radin presents, however, is little more than a hodgepodge of occult statistics. Unable to find a single person who can correctly guess a three-letter word or move a pencil an inch without trickery, the psi researchers have resorted to doing complex statistical analyses of data. In well-designed studies they assume that whenever they have data that, by some statistical formula, is not likely due to chance, they attribute the outcome to psi. A well-designed study is one that carefully controls for such things as cheating, sensory leakage (unintentional transfer of information by non-psychic means), inadequate randomization, and other factors that might lead to an artifact (something that looks like it's due to psi when it's actually due to something else).

    The result of this enormous data that Radin cites is that there is statistical evidence (for what it's worth) that indicates (however tentatively) that some very weak psi effects are present (so weak that not a single individual who participates in a successful study has any inkling of possessing psychic power). Nevertheless, Radin thinks it is appropriate to speculate about the enormous implications of psi for biology, psychology, sociology, philosophy, religion, medicine, technology, warfare, police work, business, and politics. Never mind that nobody has any idea as to how psi might work. That is a minor detail to someone who can write with a straight face (apparently) that:
    @Dean Radin said

    " lots of independent, simple glimpses of the future may one day innocently crash the future. It's not clear what it means to "crash the future," but it doesn't sound good. (297)"

    No, it certainly doesn't sound good. But, as somebody once said, "the future will be better tomorrow."

    [...]

    As noted above, in The Conscious Universe, Radin uses statistics and meta-analysis to prove that psychic phenomena really do exist even if those who have the experiences in the labs are unaware of them. Statistical data show that the world has gone psychic, according to the latest generation of parapsychologists. You may be unconscious of it, but your mind is affecting random number generators all over the world as you read this. The old psychic stuffโ€”thinking about aunt Hildie moments before she calls to tell you to bugger offโ€”is now demonstrated to be true by statistical methods that were validated in 1937 by Burton Camp and meta-validated by Radin 60 years later when he asserted that meta-analysis was the replication parapsychologists had been looking for. The only difference is that now when you think of aunt Hildie it might be moments before she calls her car mechanic and that, too, may be linked to activity in your mind that you are unaware of."

    The lawls come hot and heavy when the subject is insane tripe written by people who make grandiose claims on the back of a handful of number games they play. It really is a trip. Full article: www.skepdic.com/essays/radin.html

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • O oldfriend56

      A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

      One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

      Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

      There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

      This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

      Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
      .
      Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

      This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

      As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

      This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

      What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

      The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

      Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

      Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

      Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

      So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

      And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

      Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Los
      wrote on last edited by
      #141

      @ldfriend56 said

      "I dont need evidence to make the claim, I experienced it. to say ' it appeared like I was entering my body' is just as relevant as saying it appears that I am typing this sentence right now. yes it certainly does appear that way when it actually appears that way."

      Right, let's say you seemed to be typing a sentence into a word processor, and then you go to bed, but when you wake up the next day, the sentence is gone. Word processor is still up, but no sentence is on it. No signs that anyone has been in your house. No signs that the computer has experienced any kind of "crash" or "glitch." What you thought that you did the night before has left absolutely no trace at all on anything. Now you have some reason to be skeptical that you actually did write that sentence, even though it seemed that you did.

      Let's say that it also seems you can leave your body. But when you do this, you can't go and obtain any information -- at all -- that you didn't already know or couldn't have guessed on your own. You've not only got grounds to be skeptical that you really left your body, but if you seriously can never obtain this kind of information when you "astral project," you have absolutely no reason to think you actually left your body, no matter how convincing it may have seemed to you.

      You disagree? Then astral project into a room where a neutral third party is waiting with random words printed on a piece of paper, read them, and report them to the other netural third party who waits with your body. Report the correct words and do this several times.

      What's that? No? Gee, what a surprise....

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • O oldfriend56

        A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

        One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

        Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

        There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

        This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

        Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
        .
        Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

        This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

        As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

        This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

        What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

        The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

        Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

        Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

        Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

        So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

        And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

        Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

        A Offline
        A Offline
        Avshalom Binyamin
        wrote on last edited by
        #142

        So statistics are no longer valid when you dont like the results.

        How objective. ๐Ÿ™„

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • O oldfriend56

          A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

          One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

          Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

          There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

          This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

          Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
          .
          Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

          This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

          As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

          This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

          What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

          The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

          Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

          Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

          Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

          So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

          And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

          Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Los
          wrote on last edited by
          #143

          @Avshalom Binyamin said

          "So statistics are no longer valid when you dont like the results."

          You know the old saying, "Figures don't lie but liars figure." Statistics are very open to manipulation, and that's just when conducting very simple kinds of opinion polls or collecting data on crime. Nevermind performing complicated meta-analysis of data and demonstrating that guessing games might, if we run a large enough number of guessing games, produce results that are a tiny bit higher than what we might assume by chance.

          What in the world do you think that demonstrates?

          Look how paltry this stuff is. This is your "evidence" for the outrageous claims you make and the outlandish beliefs you accept as given fact?

          It's a joke. Like I said, name the two words printed on a piece of paper. Over and over again. Name the correct number out of twenty. Over and over again. If someone could do something like that even half the time or a third of the time, it would be incredible. But of course it doesn't happen because this stuff is all malarkey.

          I realize you want to believe it, and this flimsy stuff gives you the excuse you need to pretend that your make believe games are actually doing something.

          Good luck with that.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • O oldfriend56

            A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

            One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

            Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

            There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

            This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

            Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
            .
            Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

            This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

            As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

            This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

            What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

            The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

            Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

            Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

            Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

            So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

            And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

            Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Avshalom Binyamin
            wrote on last edited by
            #144

            Even the most hardcore, objective sceptics who don't believe in remote viewing admit that there is an unexplained statistical anomaly at play here.

            My point is that you're a biased fanatic.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • O oldfriend56

              A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

              One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

              Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

              There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

              This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

              Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
              .
              Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

              This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

              As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

              This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

              What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

              The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

              Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

              Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

              Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

              So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

              And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

              Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Los
              wrote on last edited by
              #145

              @Avshalom Binyamin said

              "Even the most hardcore, objective sceptics who don't believe in remote viewing admit that there is an unexplained statistical anomaly at play here."

              Call me severely skeptical of that, but even if I were to grant you that something (incredibly minor) is happening that cannot be explained, what do you think that would demonstrate?

              It's not exactly an easy jump from "We don't know what this is" to "people have psychic powers" or even "Magic goblins grant my wishes."

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O oldfriend56

                A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                .
                Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                A Offline
                A Offline
                Avshalom Binyamin
                wrote on last edited by
                #146

                Semmelweis demonstrated a statistical correlation between hand washing and hospital survival rates decades before Pasteur demonstrated that germs exist.

                Scientists are the ones discovering new stuff. Fanatics are the ones saying it can't be done.

                I don't care whether remote viewing is true, or not. I just object to you pretending to know the truth, and to pretend you're a scientist. The universe is to big to justify such hubris.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • O oldfriend56

                  A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                  One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                  Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                  There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                  This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                  Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                  .
                  Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                  This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                  As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                  This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                  What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                  The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                  Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                  Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                  Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                  So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                  And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                  Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Los
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #147

                  I asked you a question. Even if I were to grant that something minor is happening that we cannot explain right now, what do you think that would demonstrate?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O oldfriend56

                    A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                    One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                    Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                    There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                    This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                    Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                    .
                    Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                    This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                    As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                    This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                    What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                    The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                    Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                    Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                    Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                    So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                    And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                    Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Avshalom Binyamin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #148

                    That information can be transmitted in ways other than the experiment prevented. It could demonstrate telepathy, precognition, or something else.

                    Regardless, it ain't chance.

                    We just don't know.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • O oldfriend56

                      A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                      One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                      Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                      There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                      This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                      Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                      .
                      Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                      This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                      As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                      This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                      What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                      The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                      Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                      Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                      Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                      So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                      And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                      Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Los
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #149

                      @Avshalom Binyamin said

                      "We just don't know."

                      Correct. Even if the experiments actually indicate what some readings of the data might suggest -- and it's a big if -- the most that they would demonstrate is "we just don't know" what's actually going on.

                      It doesn't make any supernatural claims even slightly more likely to be true.

                      In logic, this kind of fallacy is called an "argument from ignorance." Just because we don't know something, it doesn't support any particular claim. Witness, for example, Creationists who try to find things that evolution can't explain, thinking that if they can demonstrate the existence of something that cannot be currently explained, it supports their supernatural ideas.

                      But "we just don't know" can never support a claim. Just like not being able to explain something in biology doesn't make creationism any more likely to be true, not being able to explain some statistical anomaly (which may or may not exist) in guessing games doesn't make any supernatural claims any more likely to be true.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • O oldfriend56

                        A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                        One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                        Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                        There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                        This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                        Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                        .
                        Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                        This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                        As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                        This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                        What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                        The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                        Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                        Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                        Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                        So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                        And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                        Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                        A Offline
                        A Offline
                        Avshalom Binyamin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #150

                        Well, I'm not trying to convince you to believe in something, so that's irrelevant.

                        Now, if you were alive between when Semmelweis and Pasteur did their main contributions, you would be correct to say:

                        We need more evidence
                        There's a statistical anomaly here
                        I haven't seen definitive proof of germs

                        But a Baffoon to say:
                        Germs do not exist
                        Nobody has good reason to believe in germs

                        When you say the first things, you can have your mind changed. When you say the second things, you're being a fanatic.

                        The world will go on being what it is, regardless of you or my silly opinions. Skeptics and scientists are focused on discovering what that world is. Fanatics are busy worrying about making everyone believe the same as them.

                        You're a fanatic. Not a skeptic. And as long as you go around acting like one, I'm gonna keep pointing it out.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • O oldfriend56

                          A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                          One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                          Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                          There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                          This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                          Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                          .
                          Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                          This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                          As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                          This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                          What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                          The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                          Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                          Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                          Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                          So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                          And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                          Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Los
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #151

                          @Avshalom Binyamin said

                          "But a Baffoon to say:
                          Germs do not exist
                          Nobody has good reason to believe in germs"

                          Before there was sufficient evidence for germs, nobody had good reason to believe that they existed. The time to believe a claim is when the evidence is there for it, and as you've adequately demonstrated over the last few posts, these guessing-game experiments aren't evidence for any claim.

                          EDIT: And to anticipate your likely next line, of course it's fine for people to do experiments to try to demonstrate the existence of germs or magic or whatever. But nobody -- including the people performing the experiments -- has sufficient reason to accept the claims until these experiments generate evidence for those claims.

                          "You're a fanatic."

                          Oh, please. It's not being "fanatical" to not accept outlandish claims on the basis of the flimsy crap you've been pointing to.

                          It's also not being "fanatical" to point out that nobody is justified in using the flimsy crap you've been pointing to as evidence of any of the wildly outlandish claims that are routinely discussed on this forum as if they were self-evident fact.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • O oldfriend56

                            A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                            One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                            Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                            There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                            This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                            Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                            .
                            Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                            This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                            As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                            This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                            What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                            The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                            Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                            Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                            Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                            So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                            And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                            Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                            A Offline
                            A Offline
                            Avshalom Binyamin
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #152

                            "Before there was sufficient evidence for germs, nobody had good reason to believe that they existed. The time to believe a claim is when the evidence is there for it, and as you've adequately demonstrated over the last few posts, these guessing-game experiments aren't evidence for any claim."

                            There was always sufficient evidence for germs as long as germs existed. People just hadn't noticed the evidence yet. There's a difference between what is, and what we happen to notice.

                            Semmelweis noticed a statistical correlation. He ended up saving lots of lives at a hospital because of it. He had sufficient evidence. But the scientific community didn't consider it sufficient.

                            "Sufficient evidence" is therefore subjective.

                            "Oh, please. It's not being "fanatical" to not accept outlandish claims on the basis of the flimsy crap you've been pointing to."

                            You're entitled to your own opinion. You're free to not accept anything you don't personally have sufficient evidence for.

                            "It's also not being "fanatical" to point out that nobody is justified in using the flimsy crap you've been pointing to as evidence of any of the wildly outlandish claims that are routinely discussed on this forum as if they were self-evident fact."

                            You're right. A more accurate term would be "dogmatic".

                            You're peddling your own dogma.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • O oldfriend56

                              A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                              One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                              Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                              There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                              This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                              Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                              .
                              Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                              This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                              As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                              This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                              What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                              The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                              Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                              Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                              Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                              So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                              And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                              Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                              U Offline
                              U Offline
                              Uni_Verse
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #153

                              You are aware that nothing is material ?
                              That is to say an energy wave form only becomes a particle when it is observed.
                              Until then, it has no "real" existence.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • O oldfriend56

                                A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                                One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                                Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                                There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                                This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                                Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                                .
                                Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                                This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                                As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                                This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                                What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                                The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                                Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                                Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                                Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                                So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                                And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                                Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                                U Offline
                                U Offline
                                Uni_Verse
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #154

                                Since every one here does not have a scientific background, I am going to avoid jargon and attempt to explain this in "layman" terms ( so any errors fall on my shoulders):

                                If we go by the findings of the physicist David Bohm:
                                Any apparent separation between matter and consciousness is an illusion.
                                A construct only occurring/assembled after both consciousness and matter have unfolded into the perceivable world of objects and sequential/linear time.
                                There is another realm of impercievable objects, including the inner worlds (such as thought) which take place outside the confluence of linear time and our senses.

                                To quote Bohm:
                                "... at the sub-quantum level, in which the quantum potential operated, location ceased to exist. All points in space became equal to all other points in space, and it was meaningless to speak of anything being separate from anything else."

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • O oldfriend56

                                  A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                                  One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                                  Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                                  There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                                  This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                                  Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                                  .
                                  Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                                  This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                                  As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                                  This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                                  What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                                  The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                                  Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                                  Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                                  Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                                  So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                                  And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                                  Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                                  O Offline
                                  O Offline
                                  oldfriend56
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #155

                                  @Los said

                                  "

                                  You disagree? Then astral project into a room where a neutral third party is waiting with random words printed on a piece of paper, read them, and report them to the other netural third party who waits with your body. Report the correct words and do this several times.

                                  ."

                                  It's not that I disagree or agree, it's what you suggest here is irrelevant to my experience and my experience is for my own reference. I am not making claims about astral travel, I am reporting an experience that occurred OUTSIDE of my body and this was a phenomenon that occurred while I was a child until the age of around 5 in waking consciousness.

                                  You don't believe it?

                                  Who cares.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • O oldfriend56

                                    A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                                    One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                                    Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                                    There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                                    This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                                    Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                                    .
                                    Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                                    This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                                    As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                                    This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                                    What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                                    The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                                    Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                                    Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                                    Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                                    So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                                    And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                                    Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                                    O Offline
                                    O Offline
                                    oldfriend56
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #156

                                    @Los said

                                    "
                                    Yeah sure, whatever you say, buddy.

                                    One of my favorite mockeries of this kind of nonsense was written by Robert Todd Carroll in his article "What if Dean Radin's Right?" [Radin being a wackaloo who supports this kind of nonsense, of course]

                                    A few choice excerpts that sum up my feelings on the subject as well:"

                                    Ahh, your feelings on the subject eh? Using a 'biased' source? what happened to reason Los?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • O oldfriend56

                                      A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                                      One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                                      Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                                      There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                                      This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                                      Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                                      .
                                      Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                                      This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                                      As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                                      This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                                      What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                                      The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                                      Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                                      Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                                      Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                                      So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                                      And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                                      Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                                      O Offline
                                      O Offline
                                      oldfriend56
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #157

                                      @Los said

                                      "

                                      You know the old saying, "Figures don't lie but liars figure." Statistics are very open to manipulation, and that's just when conducting very simple kinds of opinion polls or collecting data on crime. Nevermind performing complicated meta-analysis of data and demonstrating that guessing games might, if we run a large enough number of guessing games, produce results that are a tiny bit higher than what we might assume by chance.

                                      "

                                      Los do you have ANY background in science or statistical analysis to be able to make such a counter? HARDLY. You're copying and pasting or lifting words from someone else to make this claim. What you are saying is here absolutely false - or, at best goes both ways. If statistics can be manipulated to fit the interpretation, then that could very easily apply to the interpretation of data by the pseudo skeptic crowd.

                                      You're playing the 'heads I win, tails you lose' game. You claim there is no evidence, but when presented with evidence, claim it's not really evidence. This is a very typical response and certainly not new. Statistical analysis is valid for all science, not just the science you like. Modern medical research use these same statistical averages to make claims about the efficacy of a drug trial.

                                      You have absolutely no credibility here in this discussion.

                                      If anyone wants to hear a REAL skeptical scientist (richard wiseman) debate this EXACT argument with a REAL scientist (rupert sheldrake) regarding a bit of research into psi
                                      you will find this pod cast quite enjoyable. Wiseman not only gets refuted beyond measure, he also gets exposed for his bias and manipulation of the data to fit his worldview. He actually replicated sheldrake's data in his study, and covered it up!

                                      www.skeptiko.com/rupert-sheldrake-and-richard-wiseman-clash/

                                      Scroll down a bit to find the audio player.

                                      Let's USE THIS case Los. Would love to see how your arguments measure up. Try to support Wiseman in this study. Let's see how far your reason can go before you go completely irrational.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • O oldfriend56

                                        A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                                        One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                                        Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                                        There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                                        This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                                        Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                                        .
                                        Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                                        This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                                        As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                                        This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                                        What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                                        The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                                        Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                                        Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                                        Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                                        So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                                        And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                                        Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                                        O Offline
                                        O Offline
                                        oldfriend56
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #158

                                        @Uni_Verse said

                                        "Since every one here does not have a scientific background, I am going to avoid jargon and attempt to explain this in "layman" terms ( so any errors fall on my shoulders):

                                        If we go by the findings of the physicist David Bohm:
                                        Any apparent separation between matter and consciousness is an illusion.
                                        A construct only occurring/assembled after both consciousness and matter have unfolded into the perceivable world of objects and sequential/linear time.
                                        There is another realm of impercievable objects, including the inner worlds (such as thought) which take place outside the confluence of linear time and our senses.

                                        To quote Bohm:
                                        "... at the sub-quantum level, in which the quantum potential operated, location ceased to exist. All points in space became equal to all other points in space, and it was meaningless to speak of anything being separate from anything else.""

                                        Bohm, like Rupert Sheldrake and a small handful of other scientists, are part of the Holistic Philosophy of Science school. In the philosophy of science, this is a very very small school. The reductionist school in the philosophy of science is what makes up the majority of science.

                                        Science only delivers KNOWLEDGE, it does not deliver UNDERSTANDING, philosophy does. It's not that the science is wrong, it's the reductionist philosophy of science that is incomplete and we have a long way to go before that horse takes a rest.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • O oldfriend56

                                          A few discussions on this forum stimulated this thinking process for me recently (Thanks Los!) and I find it actually quite interesting. Wondering if the community here would not mind if I run it by to get a little feedback or edit/augmentation.

                                          One of the appeals of Thelema to me historically was the idea of how compatible Thelema is with other religious, esoteric, or mystical traditions, and in principle, any religious or mystical tradition is 'upgradeable' to Aeon 3.0 so to speak.

                                          Thelema, I think most here would agree, is a combination of a philosophy and a religion. Putting the religious component aside, how compatible is Thelema with modern western philosophy, primarily Materialism or Physicalism?

                                          There is no question that Philosophical Materialism is the dominant 'belief system' of academic and educated western society. What does it look like if combined with Thelema?

                                          This is where, to be honest, I found Los' posts absolutely fascinating because at face value, to me at least, I did not see compatibility between Philosophical Materialism with Philosophical Thelema (unless of course one is uniting philosophical materialism and combining it with it's opposite to produce a new child or synthesis).

                                          Materialism is a monism - meaning it assumes there is only the measurable physical reality and provides no allowances for spirits or a mysterious dimension to consciousness and any activity must be a function of the brain/body
                                          .
                                          Thelema, one could say would still be Philosophical Dualism (as defined by philosophy, not thelemites) because Thelema of course does have allowances for spirits and indeed credits it's existence as a preternatural spirit as it's author.

                                          This gets interesting, I promise ๐Ÿ˜„

                                          As defined by Crowley (can't find the reference), the Aeon of Isis could be understood simply as the aeon where 'the material denies the spiritual'. The Aeon of Osiris could be defined as 'the spiritual denies the material'. Distinguished by our modern Aeon that is the child Horus, product of Isis and Osiris - 'both material and spiritual, at once' (my words).

                                          This suggests to me that actually the idea of a Thelemic Materialism is quite an interesting 'concunction' to ponder. What happens to the union with the spiritual in a purely physical philosophy that for all states and purposes, is Thelemic? How does the physical transform enough to allow for all things spiritual, and how does the spiritual transform to become all things material?

                                          What this would suggest to me is that a very pivotal point in the evolution of Western Science is on the horizon and we can find evidence of this emergence in academic progress now currently just outside of mainstream.

                                          The reemergence of Pan Psychism'en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panpsychism as a mainstream theory. The discovery that the material universe is 'alive', having an experience with various levels of intelligence. (this idea is still not taken seriously amongst mainstream outspoken proponents of materialism, but at least it's now an accepted 'debate' academically philpapers.org/rec/HOLPPN).

                                          Where does Materialism begin to 'touch' it's opposite and find a transcendent in the New Aeon?

                                          Daniel Dennet and Ray Kurzweil famously assert that 'computers' can be conscious, and have conscious experience. Kurzweil's 'The Age of Spiritual Machines'. One favorite quote of mine by Kurzweil is "People ask me if I believe God exists, I always reply 'not yet' "

                                          Coupled with the discovery that the universe, too, is a giant quantum computer. www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/03/the-universe-is-a-quantum-computer.html Seth Lloyd makes it clear that he is not saying the universe is like a quantum computer, it actually IS a quantum computer.

                                          So to summarize - Materialism may be the least explored and possibly most relevant candidate for synthesis with Thelema that may do more to establish the 'aeon of the crowned and conquering child' than any other body of religious thought.

                                          And while I often disagree with Los's conclusions, I do think his explorations of a purely material Thelema is something that is worthwhile and needs the support of the thelemic community.

                                          Would love to hear some thoughts or feedback. Apologies if I have bastardized any one's knowledge or understanding and please correct me where you feel I have.

                                          U Offline
                                          U Offline
                                          Uni_Verse
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #159

                                          @ldfriend56 said

                                          "Ahh, your feelings on the subject eh? Using a 'biased' source? what happened to reason Los?"

                                          WHAT ARE YOU DOING MY OLD FRIEND?
                                          Next, you are going to reveal how many "scientific facts" are only true by definition (which was "determined" to be a fallacy) -
                                          subsequently rocking his theoretical considerations to the core

                                          That would be akin to removing the fruit from his cake.

                                          @ldfriend56 said

                                          "Science only delivers KNOWLEDGE, it does not deliver UNDERSTANDING, philosophy does. It's not that the science is wrong, it's the reductionist philosophy of science that is incomplete and we have a long way to go before that horse takes a rest."

                                          I entirely agree.
                                          My intent is never to argue against the sciences, unfortunately too many discussions get bogged down in one or more parties being unable to accept the basic restriction that knowledge is the only thing imparted.

                                          EDIT:
                                          After all, I do have a background in Mathematics and Computer Science ๐Ÿ˜„

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups