Nuit, Hadit and Experiences
-
Am I correct in the understandng that Nuit represents the totallity of all experience and existance, and Hadit is one point of experience/viewpoint? And when Hadit has experienced each and every point within Nuit then there is no difference between any one point because they each would have experienced ALL. It would basically cease to be Hadit and become Nuit - The one would become the all with universal consciousness?
I didn't do a very good job explaining the above, but I think it is good enough to establish the groundwork of my main question:
This idea implys that it is everyone's job to experience as much as possible and over all lifetimes to experience everything. Is this correct or am I way off? If this is the case, then how could one experience all points when there are some experiences that are against the LAW. For example, being a dictator or serial killer is an experience yet it is against the Law in that it is an attack against other Wills, and thus you could not be doing your true will.
-
@DavidH said
"Am I correct in the understandng that Nuit represents the totallity of all experience and existance, and Hadit is one point of experience/viewpoint?"
Yes, that's the usual formulation and one I find exceedingly useful: Nuit is all possible units of experience, Hadit is the p.o.v. continually in motion experiencing each.
"And when Hadit has experienced each and every point within Nuit then there is no difference between any one point because they each would have experienced ALL. It would basically cease to be Hadit and become Nuit - The one would become the all with universal consciousness?"
For the first sentence - to Hadit, there is always equality among points of view. It's only the personality that values one above another, that "makes a difference" between this and that. For the second sentence - a point of view would cease to be a p.o.v. if it perceived all points simultaneously - it is, in any case, never self-perceiving, so only when the p.o.v. itself is abandoned would it become Nuit. (So, I guess that means my answer would be "no." <g>)
"This idea implys that it is everyone's job to experience as much as possible and over all lifetimes to experience everything."
The issue isn't the end - it's the going.
Infinite space is composed of infinite non-dimensional points. It isn't necessary that each point individually experience everything since we're all in this together. It is only necessary that each point come awake and perceive the All from it's unique position. So the real job is to make sure that everyone comes awake!
-
@Jim Eshelman said
"It isn't necessary that each point individually experience everything since we're all in this together. It is only necessary that each point come awake and perceive the All from it's unique position. So the real job is to make sure that everyone comes awake!"
Ok, got it...sort of. That helps but still not 100%. Forgive me, I haven't slept in a week! I guess the part that throws me a bit is that to "perceive the All from your unique position" is not clear to me. If you truly perceived ALL then would you not be perceiving every position simultaniously and thus no longer have a unique position? Maybe you have an analogy for me?
-
@DavidH said
"Ok, got it...sort of. That helps but still not 100%. Forgive me, I haven't slept in a week! I guess the part that throws me a bit is that to "perceive the All from your unique position" is not clear to me. If you truly perceived ALL then would you not be perceiving every position simultaniously and thus no longer have a unique position? Maybe you have an analogy for me?"
In the universal scope, all that each of us actually is is a point of view - a position.
In a theoretically (conceptually) unimpeded infinite space, from that point (which is really an infinitesimally small window), every point in the universe can be seen except the point of view itself. Hadit himself is "known never." It takes another point of view to see a given point. The continued postulation of self as a distinguished self excludes the uninterrupted experience of the All.
-
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
IT is not necessary to experience everything, since you are already everything. Nuit is the sum of all things, and that is why we can call Nuit Nothing. We can not know all things, and therefore we cannot understand that. To us, the experience of ALL things is nothing, because it is simply not there for us. Hadit is any one point of experience. I tend to think of Nuit as the ultimate experience-that thing we call God. Hadit I liken to the soul, because while we are all and many, we are but one point. Even in unfolding our Selves, we only gain a certain amount of experience. Therefore we remain but Hadit.
Love is the law, love under will.