Psychological Commentary on Liber AL vel Legis
-
-
93,
The author has obviously found value in his own reflections here. I can't say I learned anything of much depth, nor any new insights, by reading the first four or five sections.
93 93/93,
EM.
-
@Edward Mason said
"93,
I can't say I learned anything of much depth, nor any new insights, by reading the first four or five sections.
93 93/93,
EM."
Well, if you already agree and know everything in there, that must mean theres a sort of agreement going on at least!
Jim? Any comments? You seem to weave various psychological assertions into your posts.
65 & 210,
111-418 -
the primary weakpoint was the reliance on Jung. treating of discrete consciousness in an estimation of True (or any other kind of ) Will is a conservative option.
my favourite portion of this essay was:
"...the process of coming to know and express one’s Will is understood to be analogous not only to Crowley’s notions of 'the Great Work' and 'Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel,' but also Carl Jung’s process of 'individuation.' All of these are united by the fact that they all attempt to penetrate to the deepest or true nature of the individual and attempt to assimilate and manifest it."
the claims by the Beast and the Archetypist beyond this are vacuous.