Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∴A∴
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

Duality and Thelema

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Thelema
70 Posts 13 Posters 3.2k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z Zalthos

    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

    As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

    One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

    An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

    I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

    Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

    Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

    The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

    Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

    On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

    This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

    Love is the law, love under will.

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Bereshith
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    It's not some old teaching that is learned by wrote.

    It's the initial language of unconscious imagery.

    Just the other day, someone who has no qabalistic training at all was relating a dream he had: Looking for mushrooms in a forest, he came upon the royal personages of the King and Queen. He didn't learn that from alchemical or qabalistic study. It arose spontaneously from his unconscious.

    The symbols are naturally occurring reflections of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems.

    One may, by reason, make an excellent case (as you have) against the ultimacy of these symbols, and one may have an excellent argument for their ultimate transcendence (as you have).

    But I think to demand that this be understood from the very beginning of The Work is to work against the natural evolution and growth of these symbols by restricting the meaning of their early and naturally occurring symbolism in the psyche.

    In my view, we don't create and decide the symbolism. We record it as it occurs and use it to communicate and instruct.

    It's the communcation part that becomes difficult without these relative constructs.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Z Zalthos

      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

      As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

      One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

      An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

      I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

      Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

      Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

      The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

      Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

      On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

      This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

      Love is the law, love under will.

      T Offline
      T Offline
      Takamba
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @Dar es Alrah said

      "Gentlemen - what use is this error to the work?

      Success is thy proof - so tell me! Do you go up a grade when you can add this abstraction to the tree? Does it help in meditation or ritual towards the two essential tasks of the magician? If so - how? (And please be as specific as you can if you attempt this.) Does it aid you in expressing yourself as sexual beings? Perhaps resolve some type of Amfortas wound? Or help you in your relationship with your mother or HGA? Does it help to confront your demons? How does it mesh with your projections? Infact - does it do anything besides providing your ego with yet another place to stand?

      There are many erroneous perceptions in the world that are of no use at all.
      And I don't know of any unconscious imagery that means 'passive' except by the application of conscious abstract labelling after the fact, in the fashion that Crowley described so elegantly in his poem.

      And Sardonyx - if you don't get the foundations of your temple right from the start, then you'll find you have a lot of building and reconstruction work to do when the walls fall down later."

      You are the one making the charges here (accusations), so success is your proof. Tell me how your perspective (or lack thereof, depending on who is describing it) helps you in those things? Tell me how someone who projects their own issues passes beyond knowledge of the Secret of the Knights of the East and West?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Z Zalthos

        Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

        As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

        One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

        An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

        I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

        Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

        Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

        The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

        Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

        On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

        This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

        Love is the law, love under will.

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Takamba
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @Dar es Alrah said

        "
        @Takamba said
        "You are the one making the charges here (accusations), so success is your proof. Tell me how your perspective (or lack thereof, depending on who is describing it) helps you in those things? Tell me how someone who projects their own issues passes beyond knowledge of the Secret of the Knights of the East and West?"

        Takamba - there is a whole body of Buddhist literature on the subject of Anicca. I suggest you read some of it, and then post your question on the Knights of the East and West on another thread."

        I asked my question in cross examination. You opened the door with your question: "Do you go up a grade when you can add this abstraction to the tree?" We are not talking about Buddhism.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Z Zalthos

          Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

          As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

          One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

          An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

          I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

          Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

          Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

          The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

          Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

          On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

          This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

          Love is the law, love under will.

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jim Eshelman
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          It is immensely warming to see a tedious, intellectually-rigid, intensely polarized see-saw of ideas here that was not started by a man. 😆

          (Without a trace of sarcasm, I should add that the above is not a comment on the virtue of any of the individual points of view expressed here. Indeed, laissez le bon temps rouler.)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Z Zalthos

            Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

            As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

            One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

            An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

            I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

            Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

            Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

            The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

            Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

            On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

            This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

            Love is the law, love under will.

            B Offline
            B Offline
            Bereshith
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            Honestly, I just regret attempting to participate in your highly emotionally charged pet topic once again while you once again berate us for taking egoic postures.

            That sucked.

            I'm going back to being passive/active now.

            You tell me what that communicates...

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Z Zalthos

              Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

              As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

              One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

              An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

              I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

              Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

              Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

              The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

              Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

              On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

              This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

              Love is the law, love under will.

              B Offline
              B Offline
              Bereshith
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              How would you characterize yourself?

              As long as you're being so ruthlessly honest...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Z Zalthos

                Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                Love is the law, love under will.

                B Offline
                B Offline
                Bereshith
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                I mean, it is possible that you misunderstood me...

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Z Zalthos

                  Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                  As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                  One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                  An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                  I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                  Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                  Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                  The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                  Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                  On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                  This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                  Love is the law, love under will.

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Bereshith
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  Isn't it...

                  👿

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • Z Zalthos

                    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                    As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                    One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                    An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                    I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                    Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                    Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                    The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                    Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                    On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                    This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                    Love is the law, love under will.

                    A Offline
                    A Offline
                    Avshalom Binyamin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    @Dar es Alrah said

                    "Success is thy proof - so tell me! Do you go up a grade when you can add this abstraction to the tree? Does it help in meditation or ritual towards the two essential tasks of the magician? If so - how? (And please be as specific as you can if you attempt this.) Does it aid you in expressing yourself as sexual beings? Perhaps resolve some type of Amfortas wound? Or help you in your relationship with your mother or HGA? Does it help to confront your demons? How does it mesh with your projections? Infact - does it do anything besides providing your ego with yet another place to stand? "

                    Why yes, but I'm not so silly as to get into those personally things in this conversation that hasn't been about anything but providing our egos with yet another place to stand.

                    After all, my personal success is irrelevant to you...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • Z Zalthos

                      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                      As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                      One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                      An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                      I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                      Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                      Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                      The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                      Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                      On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                      This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                      Love is the law, love under will.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Mike
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      Just to throw my two cents in:

                      Alrah, I have found particular use for the active/passive dichotomy in my life. I think of it more as initiator vs receiver, or force vs material. For example, when I type on these keys of my keyboard, I am the force, and this keyboard is the material. I am the "active" part of this union, and the keyboard is the "passive" part of this union. However, the keyboard is "active" in the sense that it takes the impulses of the keys being pressed and turns it into electrical energy, which it then sends down the cable into my computer, which registers it. The computer is then "passive" from that viewpoint. This "switching" of roles continues ad infinitum, all parts being both "active" and "passive" in relation to each other.

                      We can get even more specific, of course. We could say that the neural impulse that resulted in my typing any individual letter is "active", and the rest of my brain is "passive" and receives it, and translates it into a perception of the intention to type, etc.

                      For example, lets say I have an addiction, and I feel the craving of that addiction right now. I feel pushed by it to satisfy the craving. In this example, my ego-center is being passive in relation to the subconscious/physical signal that alerts me to the craving, because it receives that signal. If I mindlessly follow through with it, I have then allowed my ego-center, "I," to remain passive in relation to the drive, which was "active." I can resist this, of course, by refusing to take that "passive" approach - the choice is an active choice of mine, of course. These are nested layers, and are all relative. But I find this kind of thinking to be very fruitful for me. The passive can be active in remaining passive, and the active can be passive in allowing the force to flow through it without interference. Again, the layers are nested, and are relative.

                      I think the entire active/passive and male/female dichotomy hinges on the fact that the (typical) male has a penis, and it is inserted into the vagina, which the typical female has, which receives the penis. That doesn't mean the man is active or the woman is passive, as any experience with the cowgirl position will make clear. It means that it can be useful as a symbol that the subconscious can understand. Thing that gets inserted: active. Thing that receives the insertion: passive. This has nothing to do with the person that the reproductive organ is a part of, their gender identity, their personality, their socio-economic status in the predominantly patriarchy society they find themselves in, etc - it's just symbolism based on what goes into what.

                      Also, I can think of a clear example of active/passive in ordinary life (and please correct me if I am wrong, Alrah): If I go up to someone I dislike and I punch them in the face, I (or my fist) am active, and the person (or their face) is passive - it receives my impulse. It is active in the sense that it applies resistance to my fist (electromagnetic force keeping the atoms apart, IIRC), and it is active in its transmitting of the pain signal to that person's brain, but in the grand view of the situation, there is clearly an initiator and a receiver in any interaction, and this is visible on all levels. All things play both roles in relation to different things.

                      93, 93/93.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Z Zalthos

                        Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                        As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                        One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                        An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                        I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                        Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                        Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                        The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                        Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                        On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                        This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                        Love is the law, love under will.

                        B Offline
                        B Offline
                        Bereshith
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        Nah...

                        You can play all you want.

                        There's no way out of it but to take the last lick, so go ahead.

                        Have the last word and let me out of it.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Z Zalthos

                          Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                          As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                          One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                          An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                          I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                          Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                          Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                          The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                          Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                          On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                          This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                          Love is the law, love under will.

                          A Offline
                          A Offline
                          Avshalom Binyamin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          @Dar es Alrah said

                          "Nobody on this forum goes to sleep worrying about the personal success of the others here, and when we aren't reading each others words or trying to figure out something, I doubt we think of each other at all.

                          I love to see good people get on, but I don't get upset when they don't either. If I did then it would just make me a part of their problem in some fashion or other."

                          Agreed to an extent, but I do know that most of us wish each other well. 😄

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Z Zalthos

                            Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                            As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                            One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                            An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                            I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                            Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                            Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                            The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                            Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                            On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                            This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                            Love is the law, love under will.

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            Danica
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #33

                            OK, I know this may be going further off topic, but I have to say it:
                            participating in the discussions here is not just 'reading & posting on some internet forum' etc. --- what we open our perception for, what we allow to enter into our span of attention, one way or another, creates what we are!
                            every single 'input from the outside' that we experience modifies our consciousness. some inputs are smaller, some we recognize as greater, etc. but every single one does it.
                            thus, so far, from my experience, chit-chatting here with all of you guys is changing my life 😄
                            and I actively accept being thus passive 😀

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • Z Zalthos

                              Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                              As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                              One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                              An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                              I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                              Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                              Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                              The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                              Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                              On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                              This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                              Love is the law, love under will.

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Mike
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              @danica said

                              "I actively accept being thus passive 😀"

                              That's exactly what I was getting at! The terms are very useful, but it shouldn't be forgotten that, in practice, they are deeply intertwined. Any individual object can be in both roles for a myriad of other objects.

                              93, 93/93.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • Z Zalthos

                                Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                                As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                                One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                                An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                                I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                                Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                                Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                                The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                                Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                                On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                                This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                                Love is the law, love under will.

                                B Offline
                                B Offline
                                Bereshith
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                Good evening, everybody!

                                Good luck in your devotional practices to your non-gender-specific, de-personified, goddish concepts!

                                Hail to that thing that is an old abstract concept in its setting! Even unto that thing that is an old abstract concept in being satisfactorily related to others! That passes from one mind to another in its idiom at the apparent downgoing of the sun. Wisdom is a good thing for guidance, and heartfelt emotion is good motivation. Hail to the old abstract concept from the metaphorical abodes of day!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Z Zalthos

                                  Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                                  As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                                  One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                                  An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                                  I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                                  Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                                  Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                                  The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                                  Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                                  On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                                  This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                                  Love is the law, love under will.

                                  B Offline
                                  B Offline
                                  Bereshith
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #36

                                  Personally, I like how totally impersonal it all becomes... how safe... how psychologically impotent...

                                  That's my favorite.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • Z Zalthos

                                    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                                    As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                                    One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                                    An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                                    I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                                    Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                                    Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                                    The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                                    Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                                    On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                                    This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                                    Love is the law, love under will.

                                    T Offline
                                    T Offline
                                    Takamba
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #37

                                    @Dar es Alrah said

                                    "a girl on top, wearing what looks like a wonder woman outfit, and she's tossing a rope around her head and shouting "Yee Ha!" 😆 ]"

                                    Add the white cowboy hat and the optional spurs, and you got it.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • Z Zalthos

                                      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                                      As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                                      One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                                      An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                                      I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                                      Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                                      Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                                      The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                                      Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                                      On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                                      This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                                      Love is the law, love under will.

                                      B Offline
                                      B Offline
                                      Bereshith
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #38

                                      Hmm... Interesting segue...

                                      Well, if you liked what I wrote, then that actually explains some things to me.

                                      "Success is thy proof - so tell me! Do you go up a grade when you can add this abstraction to the tree? "

                                      Don't know.

                                      "Does it help in meditation or ritual towards the two essential tasks of the magician? If so - how? (And please be as specific as you can if you attempt this.)"

                                      Yes, bhakti devotional practice aids in "enflaming oneself."

                                      "Does it aid you in expressing yourself as sexual beings? "

                                      Yes.

                                      "Perhaps resolve some type of Amfortas wound? "

                                      Perhaps.

                                      "Or help you in your relationship with your mother or HGA? "

                                      Absolutely.

                                      "Does it help to confront your demons? "

                                      Forces it, actually, when the mind is forced to hold the image of the particular energy in its most psychologically positive form.

                                      "How does it mesh with your projections?"

                                      It helps categorize them and make sense of them.

                                      "Infact - does it do anything besides providing your ego with yet another place to stand?"

                                      The ego has to have a place to "stand" in order to take "the next step."

                                      Your line of questions seems set up to be belittling to the advanced magician, as if such things would be beneath him or her. But you gotta start somewhere. That's really my whole point.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Z Zalthos

                                        Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                                        As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                                        One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                                        An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                                        I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                                        Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                                        Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                                        The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                                        Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                                        On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                                        This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                                        Love is the law, love under will.

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        Jim Eshelman
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #39

                                        Not speaking for Sardonyx, but giving answers from my p.o.v. "over here" ...

                                        @Dar es Alrah said

                                        "How do you appreciate bhakti practice as 'passive'?"

                                        Great question. Bhakti is inherently affirmative, "active," passionate. OTOH I think there are... more nuanced answers here than this off-the-cuff.

                                        On any matters of love, and especially of sexuality, I think we have to keep in mind that both the pitcher and the catcher are on the same baseball team; that both pitching and catching are essential functions; and that, despite their names, both the pitcher AND the catcher throw the ball and catch it. 😉

                                        "
                                        "
                                        "Or help you in your relationship with your mother or HGA? "

                                        Absolutely."

                                        Curious! In what way?"

                                        One of Phyllis' favorite passages to quote instructively, from Liber VII, Chapter 5:

                                        *46. Nor by memory, nor by imagination, nor by prayer, nor by fasting, nor by scourging, nor by drugs, nor by ritual, nor by meditation; only by passive love shall he avail.
                                        47. He shall await the sword of the Beloved and bare his throat for the stroke. *

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Z Zalthos

                                          Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

                                          As the title of this thread suggests, this is an enormous subject that I expect will foster little more than vague, far-reaching statements (which I rather like, actually). I'm curious as to people's experience in encountering "Pairs of Opposites," specifically in esoteric study.

                                          One of the most significant spiritual experiences of my life was in a dream I had some years back. At this point in my life, I was absolutely obsessed with Gender, and why manifested existence has taken the forms it has; why two sexes? why ten fingers, ten toes, etc? But I always found myself coming back to Gender. The dream climaxed in a Union with a "Knowledge-Bearing Light," who bestowed a communication upon me that answered all my seeking and offered me much much more, which I promptly partook of. What happened next is something I can hardly describe, but "peace unutterable" would be the closest attempt I could make.

                                          An obvious consideration in the context of Gender is Nuit and Hadit. However, at present, I find myself deeply concerned with 666, Lion-Serpents, and Solar-Phallic imagery in general. To me, while this is all cognate with sunlight and semen (and thus seemingly opens up a whole world of mythological allegory between sexual conception and the sun's light upon the earth), it would paradoxically seem to be a marriage between Lunar and Solar imagery: it is a composite of the Lunar Serpent, who sheds it's skin as the moon sheds it's shadow, and the Solar Lion, with its powerful transmissive roar and round solar face.

                                          I suppose there are always multiple ways of reading the same thing: one could easily attribute the sun to the serpent, as the serpent never closes its eyes, while the sun never gives up its light; it takes it's light with it, and it is we who are left in the darkness of night. However, as I've almost exclusively seen the Lion-Serpent presented in a Solar-Phallic context, its left me to wonder if there is a corresponding Lunar-Ovic (so to speak) image that I am missing. Or maybe the appropriate context for the Lion-Serpent imagery does lie in a Lunar-Solar Union, and therefore may be symbolic of the Child principle itself. But this comes at odds with the Chokmah attributions I have heavily considered, as the Lion-Serpent is "The Beast," in my understanding

                                          Qabalistically, I've also noticed that one can take the Paths in Pairs. Starting from the Bottom of the Tree, or the Tail of Nechushtan, its starts off wonderfully: The Universe and The Aeon (Spirit), The Sun and The Moon, and The Emperor and The Tower all seem to fit well together as pairs. Has anyone had much experience with studying the Paths in this context?

                                          Also Qabalistically, every one of the Three Gates is rendered by two horizontally oriented Sephiroth. I can't help but believe there is incredible significance to this, and I'm hoping someone here can embellish on this regard.

                                          The Father & Mother and Son & Daughter of Tetragrammaton can also be read in pairs, Macrocosm and Microcosm respectively.

                                          Some really huge ones for me lately have been Hate & Love and Relationship & Identity. I actually intend to write an essay on Relationship & Identity soon. These two ideas represent to me the two fundamental approaches to Deity: any given religion will either encourage a relationship to deity or an identity with deity. While I typically have always held identity as superior, recent experiences have begun to reveal to me that Identity is actually created by Relationship, and perhaps even vice-versa.

                                          On Hate & Love: somethings that have always stuck with me (and I believe this is all from the first part of Eight Lectures on Yoga) in my studies have been Crowley's convictions that it is infinitely more fruitful to scrap the rules and make your own, and also the idea that the mind hates routine. This, of course, is all my attempt to convey his statements in my own terms, and not necessarily a direct quotation. While this has typically left me almost completely dismissive of the very system I am aspiring to, I am reminded of how very near hate is to love itself, and perhaps one must do what one hates daily, even as one does what one loves daily, in order to achieve Balance.

                                          This is getting really long, and I do wish to hear what anyone has to say about this, so I will reel it in and bring it to a close here. I hope all of this isn't too terribly disjointed.

                                          Love is the law, love under will.

                                          B Offline
                                          B Offline
                                          Bereshith
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #40

                                          "I cannot see that it's of any use to women, and it seems a little unfair to your partners if you project the idea of 'passive' onto them so that you can 'take the next step'. I know you say that you don't do that anymore, but I think that perhaps intellectually a man can become comfortable with the idea that there is both masculine/active and feminine/passive forces in him and in the woman, while still operating on an unconscious fundamental dualistic level - projecting out what he expects his 'passive' and agreeable anima onto the woman and then blaming her for not being the illusionary abstraction he wanted. "

                                          See, this is it right here. This is why you get so pissed. You cannot believe that we are not deluding ourselves. This is the projection that continues this argument without end. This is the reason you can't hear what I am really saying. It's all knotted up for you: system of instruction AND belittling abuse.

                                          Regarding the belittling abuse of considering women passive... I forget that this exists. I forget that A.C. said some really antiquated stuff about this. I simply ignore it. I don't know what else to tell you. My wife is Sun in Leo/Moon in Aries, and at times I wonder if there is a passive bone in her body. Where you find this error, stamp it out.

                                          But regarding the system of instruction, with active and passive, male and female all over the tarot, as well as the presentation of Hadit and Nuit as a divine male/female pair, I'm for leaving it as it is. The psyche doesn't begin as whole. It begins with separated concepts. It's not the instruction that teaches this. These are archetypes so deeply present in the human consciousness that they may well be described as universal. It is from the human depths that these separated, unintegrated symbols arise. It is the Work that unifies and integrates, but not without working through the aspirants psychological associations to mommy and daddy, male and female, action and passivity.

                                          The first thing that has to happen to create a happy, healthy magician, (at least how I was taught) is that they must do the personality work of the tarot. The Emperor is going to work pretty hard on people who have negative associations with male power and the abuse of strength. The concept of male power itself arises naturally in the symbolism of the unconscious. It is the baby talk of the unconscious. Likewise, the Empress is going to work pretty hard on people who have negative associations with feminine love. You were asking "how" above. I'm trying to explain. The first thing that needs to happen is that consciousness needs to focus on the energies represented as the Emperor and the Empress in their most psychologically beneficial and healthy light.

                                          It is very natural for humans to associate these energies with mommy and daddy and their personifications as Empress and Emperor. Step One is to bring order to the chaos of negative male and female associations - associations that already exist as masculine and feminine in the unconscious, but in a chaos of positive and negative associations. This is how these concepts help with relationships and sexuality - they provide order and psychologically postive images for the more chaotic naturally arising associations, and once this is achieved, many blocks arising from negative projections are cleared.

                                          It's not that after you reach a certain level, they tell you to forget everything you learned before. It's that the initial work, the groundwork, lies in untangling psychological knots that do have pre-existing associations with male and female.

                                          After the knots are cleared, and the energy begins to flow again, then a person can begin to understand the energy itself more clearly and recognize the projected maleness or femaleness is exactly that - a projection. But not until you clear the psychological blocks that keep the energy from flowing.

                                          The reason that I react to your suggestion that we remove all the male and female stuff is that then we are left with no tools to work with the psyche's own language. You do away with the ability to make the association itself, and thus remove the ability to work with individual's gender-based psychological energy blocks. I absolutely think it all goes back to mommy and daddy and brothers and sisters. And as long as an individual's magical worldview is tainted with negative associations for male and female, they can't get any closer to seeing things as they really are.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups