G.'.D.'. and A.'.A.'. maps test ride report
-
And i do get Yetzirah in 5=6 can be good as a system, as masonry and many things can be, the only problem is as Crowley unveiled the "real" GD which is Briah in 5=6, any genuine GD system must follow this, otherwise called something else isnt it? My map respects this, it is only concerning how to get to dominus liminis that i suggest a different way. After it would be the same.
-
@Frater Horus said
"And i do get Yetzirah in 5=6 can be good as a system, as masonry and many things can be, the only problem is as Crowley unveiled the "real" GD which is Briah in 5=6,"
5=6 in A.'.A.'. is not G.'.D.'. anymore, its R.'.C.'..
"any genuine GD system must follow this, otherwise called something else isnt it?"
What is a genuine G.D. system? What is a G.D. system, for that matter?
"My map respects this, it is only concerning how to get to dominus liminis that i suggest a different way."
There's no need to "respect" Tiphereth in Briah if you're going to have the lower Sephiroth in Assiah, wasting precious time and putting the future "Dominus Liminis" (if one could even call someone that in this case) in a situation where he is supposed to be about to attain, and yet isn't half ready for it. Saying he's facing Tiphereth (and he may well be, in Yetzirah!) won't make he progress faster â remember that, in A.'.A.'., the Grade is a recognition of the attainment (including the specific tasks), not the other way around, and each one is no small feat to pass through. The "Dominus Liminis" in your theoretical system would be at most the equivalent of a 2=9 A.'.A.'. and would still need to equilibrate himself regarding the elements and prepare himself quite extensively before attaining. That's the problem: in A.'.A.'. the Path of Samekh would be Yetzirah verging on Briah; in the old G.D. it would be Assiah verging on Yetzirah; and in your map you would have the aspirant working in Assiah, starting with Yetzirah and somehow Briah is supposed to appear for the next Grade without time or preparation â how does that work?
"After it would be the same."
Another thing: why after? One thing at a time. The pathway to Adepthood should be the one most carefully mapped and layed down, since the aspirant doesn't have K&C to guide himself with because, well, that's what he's trying to achieve.
-
@Frater Horus said
"
@Jim Eshelman said
"The Rising on the Planes test is not part of the Neophyte test at all."What i mean is we could see 4=7's "rising on the planes" test as the "real" "mastery of the astral plane" test. In a sense where the actual mastery of the astral plane happens in 4=7, not in 1=10. "
Well, I supposed you could. But they're testing different things. The task in 1=10 is to effectively open and cross etc. the bridge from Assiah to Yetzirah. The task in Samekh is for someone who already has that one well in hand, and the assignment now becomes one of the core practices that bridges between Yetzirah and Briah. The natures of the practices are extremely different.
"And elements are not only Assiah. Arent the four worls the most subtle expression of them for instance?"
They're certainly a very subtle expression of YHVH. I do wonder whether we are being sloppy in calling them "the elements." Nonetheless, you're right that they are analogous to the elements.
"Isnt IHVH as such briatic(?)?"
As a Divine Name, it is Atziluthic. (I think I missed something here.)
"Also we work them in Yetzirah as much as in Assiah dont we?"
Very much so. Especially in Yetzirah of Malkuth (since, in a different sense, it is Malkuth that is distinctively the Sphere of the Elements).
"So i dont see any reason my map woul be less logical than Crowley's."
Oh, I see. I didn't understand that you were trying to show that you're as big a magical hot-shot as the Magus of the Aeon. I thought you were seeking understanding of the system delivered. (I'll leave alone to that, then.)
"Only the Mather's one is illogical after 4=7 in my opinion because it should "escalate" as i suggest and no keep the same rhythm and ritual system."
That's because you have no real experience of it. (Your posts make clear that you have not been working the system, but have been mixing and matching and making it up as you go along. That's fine. But don't challenge a system you haven't actually followed.)
You are also stuck on the idea that Netzach is Netzach is Netzach, and there's a single system that has to make this all make sense in a single way. That totally neglects the most basic doctrine of the Four Worlds, which is: The entire Tree exists in each of the Worlds. After that, it's a matter of how one wants to model it.
The classic GD formulae are part of a system that represent the First (or outer) Order in Assiah and the Second (or Inner) Order in Yetzirah (and, theoretically, beyond). That's valid its own terms, and need not be confused with any system that is modeled differently.
"Arent modern GD-based systems more advanced than the original one anyway?"
There is an enormous amount that has been learned in the intervening century-plus. Especially, this is in areas of human psychology, though that's not the whole of it. Also social modeling and new technology if group dynamics. And yes, some stuff that is now totally public is addressed earlier - for example, it would be silly to veil the color scales, even though they were never released until 5=6 historically (and were the real breakthrough secret of the Second Order in a practical way). Etc.
"I heard the old second order stuff is worked in the first now, and that theres a new second order..."
That would be a reasonable description of the A.'.A.'. system. That is, in A.'.A.'. nearly the entire old Second Order curriculum is in 1=10, to be followed by the old Second Order initiation formula on entering 2=9. But is A.'.A.'. what we're speaking about here? It seems it is not.
"So maybe they 're doing something similar to what i suggest. Isnt TOT also GD based but works at higher intensity?"
Higher intensity, yes; but not by importing things native to the Second Order into the First Order. One example (which I guess I'm at liberty to share): In T.'.O.'.T.'. you'll never see a Hexagram Ritual until Second Order. Why? Many reasons, but two big ones are: (1) It's inherently a solar ritual, and therefore needs to be placed consistent with other solar symbols. (2) The opening and closing parts of it are recapitulations of something that happens at a key moment in the 5° initiation, and it would loose a valuable linkage to teach or disclose that before someone had passed through the moment of being admitted into the Second Order.
T.'.O.'.T.'. also pushes further because the Second Order is developed much more deeply and fully. But the planes are modeled differently: It is the 8° that corresponds to the A.'.A.'. 5=6.
-
@Frater Horus said
"And i do get Yetzirah in 5=6 can be good as a system, as masonry and many things can be, the only problem is as Crowley unveiled the "real" GD which is Briah in 5=6, any genuine GD system must follow this, otherwise called something else isnt it? My map respects this, it is only concerning how to get to dominus liminis that i suggest a different way. After it would be the same."
<sigh> No, not the same. (You are using "Dominus Liminis" and "Portal" interchangeably, even though they are separate titles used in separate Orders.) they aren't the same because the threshold is into Yetzirah in one system, and into Briah in the other.
Again, you are trying to make a single thing out of this. It's not "the real GD" system. It's a different one.
-
Thanks Jim, very helpful
@Patrick Ossoski said
"
5=6 in A.'.A.'. is not G.'.D.'. anymore, its R.'.C.'..
."That could sum up the point. Couldnt the map i suggest correspond to an order called R.'.C.'. which would be "between" G.'.D.'. and A.'.A.'....?
-
@Frater Horus said
"Thanks Jim, very helpful
@Patrick Ossoski said
"
5=6 in A.'.A.'. is not G.'.D.'. anymore, its R.'.C.'..
."That could sum up the point. Couldnt the map i suggest correspond to an order called R.'.C.'. which would be "between" G.'.D.'. and A.'.A.'....?
"Then why not just start your own order using the system that you propose?
-
@Archaeus said
"
@Frater Horus said
"Thanks Jim, very helpful@Patrick Ossoski said
"
5=6 in A.'.A.'. is not G.'.D.'. anymore, its R.'.C.'..
."That could sum up the point. Couldnt the map i suggest correspond to an order called R.'.C.'. which would be "between" G.'.D.'. and A.'.A.'....?
"Then why not just start your own order using the system that you propose?"
We'll see what HGA says when i'll be an adept...
-
-
@Patrick Ossoski said
"
@Frater Horus said
"We'll see what HGA says when i'll be an adept..."That's actually a really good, sound idea. There's no point in a non-Adept engaging in fancy speculation about some new Order. (The blind leading the blind et al.)"
Yup; speculation is all very interesting and certainly has a place, but there is little point in going through a system if you keep asking if it is in fact the right system, that is like continually pulling the rug out from under your own feet.
The way I see it is that the old GD system up to portal is covered in AA 1=10, so advancing to 2=9 is like being a GD 5=6, so basically an AA 2=9 is roughly equivalent to a ZAM according to GD standards (because in GD the grades prior to 5=6 are elemental and so are covered in 1=10 AA).