Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∴A∴
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

Crowley on spirit

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Thelema
5 Posts 4 Posters 242 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jim Eshelman
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    In response to various claims that Aleister Crowley wasn't talking about spiritual matters in his writings, I'm going to occasionally post small items as I come across them. In the poem at the start of One Star in Sight, written in the 1920s to be part of Magick in Theory & Practice, we find the following verse on the human condition. (I've given the whole poem, but put the verse I want to highlight in bold.)

    *Thy feet in mire, thine head in murk,
    O man, how piteous thy plight,
    The doubts that daunt, the ills that irk,
    Thou hast nor wit nor will to fight –
    How hope in heart, or worth in work?
    No star in sight!

    Thy Gods proved puppets of the priest.
    “Truth? All’s relation!” science sighed.
    In bondage with thy brother beast,
    Love tortured thee, as Love’s hope died
    And Love’s faith rotted. Life no least
    Dim star descried.

    Thy cringing carrion cowered and crawled
    To find itself a chance-cast clod
    Whose Pain was purposeless; appalled
    That aimless accident thus trod
    Its agony, that void skies sprawled
    On the vain sod!*

    All souls eternally exist,
    Each individual, ultimate
    Perfect – each makes itself a mist
    Of mind and flesh to celebrate
    With some twin mask their tender tryst
    Insatiate.

    *Some drunkards, doting on the dream,
    Despair that it should die, mistake
    Themselves for their own shadow-scheme.
    One star can summon them to wake
    To self; star-souls serene that gleam
    On life’s calm lake.

    That shall end never that began.
    All things endure because they are.
    Do what thou wilt, for every man
    And every woman is a star.
    Pan is not dead; he liveth, Pan!
    Break down the bar!

    To man I come, the number of
    A man my number, Lion of Light;
    I am The Beast whose Law is Love.
    Love under will, his royal right –
    Behold within, and not above,
    One star in sight!*

    M T H 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J Jim Eshelman

      In response to various claims that Aleister Crowley wasn't talking about spiritual matters in his writings, I'm going to occasionally post small items as I come across them. In the poem at the start of One Star in Sight, written in the 1920s to be part of Magick in Theory & Practice, we find the following verse on the human condition. (I've given the whole poem, but put the verse I want to highlight in bold.)

      *Thy feet in mire, thine head in murk,
      O man, how piteous thy plight,
      The doubts that daunt, the ills that irk,
      Thou hast nor wit nor will to fight –
      How hope in heart, or worth in work?
      No star in sight!

      Thy Gods proved puppets of the priest.
      “Truth? All’s relation!” science sighed.
      In bondage with thy brother beast,
      Love tortured thee, as Love’s hope died
      And Love’s faith rotted. Life no least
      Dim star descried.

      Thy cringing carrion cowered and crawled
      To find itself a chance-cast clod
      Whose Pain was purposeless; appalled
      That aimless accident thus trod
      Its agony, that void skies sprawled
      On the vain sod!*

      All souls eternally exist,
      Each individual, ultimate
      Perfect – each makes itself a mist
      Of mind and flesh to celebrate
      With some twin mask their tender tryst
      Insatiate.

      *Some drunkards, doting on the dream,
      Despair that it should die, mistake
      Themselves for their own shadow-scheme.
      One star can summon them to wake
      To self; star-souls serene that gleam
      On life’s calm lake.

      That shall end never that began.
      All things endure because they are.
      Do what thou wilt, for every man
      And every woman is a star.
      Pan is not dead; he liveth, Pan!
      Break down the bar!

      To man I come, the number of
      A man my number, Lion of Light;
      I am The Beast whose Law is Love.
      Love under will, his royal right –
      Behold within, and not above,
      One star in sight!*

      M Offline
      M Offline
      mark0987
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      "The first condition of membership of the A∴A∴ is that one is sworn to identify one's own Great Work with that of raising mankind to higher levels, spiritually, and in every other way."

      ---Chapter 9 "Magick Without Tears."

      "The answer is that it depends on the Angel—for the purposes of this letter I propose to use the word "angel" to include all sorts of disembodied beings, from demons to gods—in all cases, they are objective; a subjective "angel" is different from a dream only in non-essentials."

      "I want you to understand that a goddess like Astarte, Astaroth, Cotytto, Aphrodite, Hathoor, Venus, are not merely aspects of the planet; they are separate individuals who have been identified with each other, and attributed to Venus merely because the salient feature in their character approximates to this ideal."

      "for I believe that the Holy Guardian Angel is a Being of this order. He is something more than a man, possibly a being who has already passed through the stage of humanity, and his peculiarly intimate relationship with his client is that of friendship, of community, of brotherhood, or Fatherhood. He is not, let me say with emphasis, a mere abstraction from yourself; and that is why I have insisted rather heavily that the term "Higher Self" implies "a damnable heresy and a dangerous delusion."

      It it were not so, there would be no point in The Sacred Magic of Abramelin the Mage."

      "But do remember this, above all else; they are objective, not subjective, or I should not waste good Magick on them."

      ---Chapter 30, "Magick Without Tears."

      "Hence: no a priori reason to deny the existence of conscious intelligences with insensible bodies. Indeed we know of other orders of mind (flies, etc., possibly vegetables) thinking by means of non-human brain-structures."

      "It is obviously impossible to communicate with an independent intelligence — the one real object of astral research — if one allows one's imagination to surround one with courtiers of one's own creation."

      "The Magician may therefore be confident that Spiritual Beings exist, and seek the Knowledge and conversation of His own Holy Guardian Angel with the same ardour as that of FRATER PERDURABO when He abandoned all: love, wealth, rank, fame, to seek Him. "

      ---Notes For an Astral Atlas.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J Jim Eshelman

        In response to various claims that Aleister Crowley wasn't talking about spiritual matters in his writings, I'm going to occasionally post small items as I come across them. In the poem at the start of One Star in Sight, written in the 1920s to be part of Magick in Theory & Practice, we find the following verse on the human condition. (I've given the whole poem, but put the verse I want to highlight in bold.)

        *Thy feet in mire, thine head in murk,
        O man, how piteous thy plight,
        The doubts that daunt, the ills that irk,
        Thou hast nor wit nor will to fight –
        How hope in heart, or worth in work?
        No star in sight!

        Thy Gods proved puppets of the priest.
        “Truth? All’s relation!” science sighed.
        In bondage with thy brother beast,
        Love tortured thee, as Love’s hope died
        And Love’s faith rotted. Life no least
        Dim star descried.

        Thy cringing carrion cowered and crawled
        To find itself a chance-cast clod
        Whose Pain was purposeless; appalled
        That aimless accident thus trod
        Its agony, that void skies sprawled
        On the vain sod!*

        All souls eternally exist,
        Each individual, ultimate
        Perfect – each makes itself a mist
        Of mind and flesh to celebrate
        With some twin mask their tender tryst
        Insatiate.

        *Some drunkards, doting on the dream,
        Despair that it should die, mistake
        Themselves for their own shadow-scheme.
        One star can summon them to wake
        To self; star-souls serene that gleam
        On life’s calm lake.

        That shall end never that began.
        All things endure because they are.
        Do what thou wilt, for every man
        And every woman is a star.
        Pan is not dead; he liveth, Pan!
        Break down the bar!

        To man I come, the number of
        A man my number, Lion of Light;
        I am The Beast whose Law is Love.
        Love under will, his royal right –
        Behold within, and not above,
        One star in sight!*

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Takamba
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        [Font:Sarcasm] Obviously this is one of those areas where Crowley got it wrong. [/font]

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jim Eshelman

          In response to various claims that Aleister Crowley wasn't talking about spiritual matters in his writings, I'm going to occasionally post small items as I come across them. In the poem at the start of One Star in Sight, written in the 1920s to be part of Magick in Theory & Practice, we find the following verse on the human condition. (I've given the whole poem, but put the verse I want to highlight in bold.)

          *Thy feet in mire, thine head in murk,
          O man, how piteous thy plight,
          The doubts that daunt, the ills that irk,
          Thou hast nor wit nor will to fight –
          How hope in heart, or worth in work?
          No star in sight!

          Thy Gods proved puppets of the priest.
          “Truth? All’s relation!” science sighed.
          In bondage with thy brother beast,
          Love tortured thee, as Love’s hope died
          And Love’s faith rotted. Life no least
          Dim star descried.

          Thy cringing carrion cowered and crawled
          To find itself a chance-cast clod
          Whose Pain was purposeless; appalled
          That aimless accident thus trod
          Its agony, that void skies sprawled
          On the vain sod!*

          All souls eternally exist,
          Each individual, ultimate
          Perfect – each makes itself a mist
          Of mind and flesh to celebrate
          With some twin mask their tender tryst
          Insatiate.

          *Some drunkards, doting on the dream,
          Despair that it should die, mistake
          Themselves for their own shadow-scheme.
          One star can summon them to wake
          To self; star-souls serene that gleam
          On life’s calm lake.

          That shall end never that began.
          All things endure because they are.
          Do what thou wilt, for every man
          And every woman is a star.
          Pan is not dead; he liveth, Pan!
          Break down the bar!

          To man I come, the number of
          A man my number, Lion of Light;
          I am The Beast whose Law is Love.
          Love under will, his royal right –
          Behold within, and not above,
          One star in sight!*

          H Offline
          H Offline
          Hermitas
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Lol... How long you been sittin' on those quotes, Mark?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • J Jim Eshelman

            In response to various claims that Aleister Crowley wasn't talking about spiritual matters in his writings, I'm going to occasionally post small items as I come across them. In the poem at the start of One Star in Sight, written in the 1920s to be part of Magick in Theory & Practice, we find the following verse on the human condition. (I've given the whole poem, but put the verse I want to highlight in bold.)

            *Thy feet in mire, thine head in murk,
            O man, how piteous thy plight,
            The doubts that daunt, the ills that irk,
            Thou hast nor wit nor will to fight –
            How hope in heart, or worth in work?
            No star in sight!

            Thy Gods proved puppets of the priest.
            “Truth? All’s relation!” science sighed.
            In bondage with thy brother beast,
            Love tortured thee, as Love’s hope died
            And Love’s faith rotted. Life no least
            Dim star descried.

            Thy cringing carrion cowered and crawled
            To find itself a chance-cast clod
            Whose Pain was purposeless; appalled
            That aimless accident thus trod
            Its agony, that void skies sprawled
            On the vain sod!*

            All souls eternally exist,
            Each individual, ultimate
            Perfect – each makes itself a mist
            Of mind and flesh to celebrate
            With some twin mask their tender tryst
            Insatiate.

            *Some drunkards, doting on the dream,
            Despair that it should die, mistake
            Themselves for their own shadow-scheme.
            One star can summon them to wake
            To self; star-souls serene that gleam
            On life’s calm lake.

            That shall end never that began.
            All things endure because they are.
            Do what thou wilt, for every man
            And every woman is a star.
            Pan is not dead; he liveth, Pan!
            Break down the bar!

            To man I come, the number of
            A man my number, Lion of Light;
            I am The Beast whose Law is Love.
            Love under will, his royal right –
            Behold within, and not above,
            One star in sight!*

            M Offline
            M Offline
            mark0987
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            "[Font:Sarcasm] Obviously this is one of those areas where Crowley got it wrong. [/font]"

            Luckily this thread isn't about whether Crowley was wrong....it is about showing that it is wrong to state that Crowley was a hard faced materialist who never believed in spiritual experience. Anyone who thinks that is wrong!

            MWT is my favorite book of Crowley's (non class A), I view it as a chat between two people without barriers and bullshit.

            "Lol... How long you been sittin' on those quotes, Mark?"

            A while, it just takes me a long time to remember where I read things!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Users
            • Groups