Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∴A∴
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

Synesthesia may explain why some "see auruas"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Mysticism
2 Posts 2 Posters 394 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Offline
    D Offline
    dr. ski wampas
    wrote on last edited by BillieA93
    #1

    Great article. Short read too.

    www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120504110024.htm

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    Gnosomai Emauton
    replied to dr. ski wampas on last edited by
    #2

    Though the paper this article reports on is locked behind a paywall, the abstract (found at www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810011002868) presents a negative conclusion to the study's hypothesis which the Science Daily article (and its source article at University of Granada) hides behind multiple uses of "might" and "may", the ever-present bugaboos of buls#!t debunking articles:

    "In a variety of synaesthesia, photisms result from affect-laden stimuli as emotional words, or faces of familiar people. For R, who participated in this study, the sight of a familiar person triggers a mental image of “a human silhouette filled with colour”. Subjective descriptions of synaesthetic experiences induced by the visual perception of people’s figures and faces show similarities with the reports of those who claim to possess the ability to see the aura. It has been proposed that the purported auric perception may be easily explained by the presence of a specific subtype of cross-modal perception. We analyse the subjective reports of four synaesthetes who experience colours in response to human faces and figures. These reports are compared with descriptions of alleged auric phenomena found in the literature and with claims made by experts in esoteric spheres. The discrepancies found suggest that both phenomena are phenomenologically and behaviourally dissimilar. [emphasis mine]"

    😒

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups