The little fault in Rudolf Steiner's Theosophie
-
Liber Ahriman & Luzifer
(the battle of the beastys)Chapter: 29
The Black 29 (Roullette =^= Sphaere of arcitectin)Once upon a time
(NM e NM := Jeremy Irons)www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLDL5mxgYNY
Aaaaah, Frank lost his memories, too
-
The Perfect and the Perfect are one Perfect and not two; nay, are none!
is equivalent to the Raven paradox, which is amen-universe v(logic ODER):
if M e N(0) > L e N(0) then
"hey, there are more elements in M than in L" ... etc.Logic is very boring, because it just describe the system of its-self.
But you can bring true aspects together and can relate to a third, like this guy here:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Egcx63-FfTESo, you can put Cantors Set theory in the Nihillislogic and can proof, that the
Gödel's incompleteness theorems art wrong. But this is boring, too.I wonder, if Gödel's ontological proof can prevent, that
Russell's paradox <= (def. Gödel's incompleteness theorems n-e Gödel's incompleteness theorems <=> False) => that, in the language of a fool, "The elements of the sentence have no other connection than "Ra-Hoor-khuit" of Aleister Crowley. They are Random an the fault in the Modal logic... The Same System was used by me in the Nihillis Logic Liber."
the Theory of relativity is element of the wrong system... Nevertheless, Light don't mind about the laws of nature... This is the work of the great art, written...
in symbols of ASCII code 
-
@Asisa said
"
Once upon a time
(NM e NM := ?)www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLDL5mxgYNY
"That would be a good Connection, As-i-This!
so www.youtube.com/watch?v=suC5W-rrfmw
=>fun=>not-fun=>
<=<=<= she greater me, Asisa.It is she IS greater than me, Asisa!!! Learn your Voc:=Book of of actors seeing future.
you mean screenplays?Yes IS Ja is Oui is!
Okay forget it, Asisa....
so: "It is she IS =>It is she?Jep, doesn't matter....
Asisa n-( ) so