Ahh, I catch your drift. I need to keep these things silent.
Joshua
Posts
-
Escaping the Abyss -
Escaping the Abyss@Legis said
"
@Joshua said
"Help has arrivedEDIT:
IS THIS A JOKE?"Is what a joke?"
THIS
(refer to previous post count lmao...)
-
Escaping the AbyssHelp has arrived
EDIT:
IS THIS A JOKE? -
Escaping the AbyssMy energy has been spiraling vastly upward lately. It seems like everything magnetically revolves around me from color patterns to numbers and words. But it almost seems to become taunting at times when I cannot fulfill my desire for love. The women I have been involved with suddenly do not reply to me. However in waking life it seems many women are attracted around me in a sort of "birds and bees" way. Is it my desire for love that is wrong to begin with? Beyond that life seems to work great no readily forseen interferences.
Could anyone offer any advice on getting over this hump?
Thanks
FR. 444
-
Guematria of 150 ?You can probably find some correlation to some idea if you add subtract divide multiply enough. But I would suggest also experimenting with different ciphers like English qabbalah and experimenting with middle last names and initials .
-
Hindu equivalent of Nuit and HaditMakes sense
ABRAHADABRA represents had in a micro macro sense while still concealing the pure beyond 0,1. NUIT being the infinite the hga being like a mothers nipple
-
Is gemetria irrelevant ?Ok ya pretty much what I have been toying with but using a few different gematria.
-
Is gemetria irrelevant ?By keys you mean 93 , HADIT, NUIT, 418, 56 etc or is their a specific document you're referencing ?
-
Hindu equivalent of Nuit and HaditI thought RA HOOR KHUIT was the self part?
-
Is gemetria irrelevant ?I guess I tend to end up contemplating whether I'm searching for some sort of secular/omnipotent knowledge that would be accessible to all, or if I'm literally amplifying my own insanity in the sense that my mind is altering reality and I am utterly alone in my understandings.
-
Is gemetria irrelevant ?So concerning the sephiroth I find that
STRENGTH=666
BEAUTY=444
MERCY=384
XVII(Star), YHWH, THELEMA, NUIT=384Seems relevant but I'm not sure if I'm just arranging random information that seems connected
-
Is gemetria irrelevant ?I've been trying to learn as much as possible about the ToL lately without any sort of instruction. It's been useful trying to take English words and convert them to Hebraic values for sake of memorizing the letters, but is there really anything meaningful in doing so?
It seems Crowley and others have no difficulty finding endless patterns with the numbers but anyone can take a handful of words and almost indefinitely connect them one way or another.
I get that matching correct letters to paths is important but does it really matter that Cheth is 418 / aleph is 111 etc or are concepts about planets feelings etc more important?
-
How can irrational things be trueIrrational things exist conceptually and require no proof. Because our perception is limited by human sensory organs, and the universe is more vast than we know, it's easy to assume anything can be possible at some point somewhere
-
Understanding Tarot AttributionsSarcasm never works on the Internet lol. I own the Book of the law(have read it many times) and book of thoth
-
Understanding Tarot Attributions@Patrick Ossoski said
"
@Liber Legis, I:57 said
"All these old letters of my Book are aright; but צ is not the Star. This also is secret: my prophet shall reveal it to the wise."
"Thanks, never read this before -.- . . .
The picture on the Rider-Waite tarot draws an obvious connection between XVII and Aquarius.
http://www.learntarot.com/bigjpgs/maj17.jpg
http://0.tqn.com/d/altreligion/1/0/E/1/-/-/pentagram_and_human_body_agrippa1.jpg
-
Understanding Tarot AttributionsWhat information allows to draw the conclusion that HEH = Aquarius ?
-
Understanding Tarot AttributionsIn some sources (Liber Theta, Liber 776 1/2), XVII is given as "Aquarius", but in the Book of Thoth XVII is given as Aries(but both give XVII as HEH).
I was wondering why this distinction was made/corrected from Crowley's, or is there intentional deception going on at one end or the other?
-
39 + 309 + 70 =My head hurts
-
39 + 309 + 70 =@HRUMACHIS said
"
@Joshua said
"Referenced 777, all the numbers you listed from column X are completely off. explanation?"Make sure you are looking by the Path number, not the Atu. The one that is different is Atu XVII which is swapped with Atu IV."
Thanks. I always wondered why thelemapedia didn't have that corrected.... (seems to be pretty glaring with Crowley's tarot interp. TSADE IS NOT THE STAR. REPEAT) As an Aquarius, I find humor here.
(My father works for a company called "Star Window". . . o.o)
-
39 + 309 + 70 =Referenced 777, all the numbers you listed from column X are completely off. explanation?