Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

Qabbalah

541 Topics 4.8k Posts

Q&A and discussion on the Hermetic Qabbalah

  • Tzaddi is not the Star

    190
    0 Votes
    190 Posts
    125k Views
    ?
    93 The swap is often contrasted against Jewish Kabbalah and the Jewish tradition of gematria. There is a technical logic to Crowley’s swap, but it is mostly Thelemic / Golden Dawn tarot-system logic, not a clean Hebrew-gematria or Jewish-kabbalistic logic. Crowley’s own stated move is clear: the line in Liber AL says “Tzaddi is not the Star,” and in the New Comment he resolves it by saying Tzaddi is The Emperor, and Heh is The Star; therefore Aries and Aquarius are counterchanged, producing what he calls “perfectly, flawlessly symmetrical” tarot attributions. [1] In Book of Thoth, he implements that literally: The Emperor is assigned to Tzaddi and Aries, while The Star is assigned to Heh and Aquarius. [2] The problem is that this does not preserve the older Hebrew-letter astrology found in Sefer Yetzirah. In the Sefaria text, the twelve simple letters are tied to the zodiac, with Heh forming Aries and Tzadi forming Aquarius. [3] That same structure is echoed in Crowley’s own 777 table before the swap: Heh = 5 = Aries = tarot IV, and Tzaddi = 90/900 = Aquarius = tarot XVII. [4] So from the standpoint of Hebrew alphabet order and classical letter-zodiac attribution, the old system is actually cleaner. Where Crowley’s move becomes “mathematical” is not gematria in the usual Jewish sense, but symmetry of tarot/zodiac geometry. He compares the Emperor/Star swap to the earlier Strength/Justice swap: Leo and Libra rotate around Virgo; Aries and Aquarius rotate around Pisces. His wording is explicit: Aries and Aquarius flank Pisces, just as Leo and Libra flank Virgo. [5] In other words, he is treating the zodiac as a loop and introducing a second “twist” to balance the first one. That is elegant inside his tarot architecture, a bit like making the graph prettier after discovering one edge is crossed. But as gematria, it is weak. Heh has the value 5; Tzaddi has 90 or final 900 in Crowley’s own table. [6] The Emperor is IV, The Star is XVII. There is no obvious Hebrew numerical equation where 5 or 90 “proves” Emperor or Star. In fact, before the swap, the ordinal structure is elegant: Fool = 0, Magus = I, Empress = III, Emperor = IV, so Heh, the 5th Hebrew letter, naturally falls on the 5th trump if the Fool is counted as zero. Likewise Tzaddi, the 18th letter, naturally falls on Trump XVII as the 18th trump. Crowley’s swap breaks that. There is one cute gematric coincidence, though: the Hebrew zodiac names for Aries and Aquarius both total 44 in standard gematria. Aries, טלה, is 9 + 30 + 5 = 44; Aquarius, דלי, is 4 + 30 + 10 = 44. Crowley’s own table gives these Hebrew sign spellings and the component letter values. [6] That makes Aries/Aquarius a surprisingly “legal-looking” pair to exchange at the level of sign-names. But that is a supporting curiosity, not a derivation. It does not explain why Tzaddi, specifically, should become Aries. From a Jewish mystical standpoint, the swap is hard to defend as traditional Kabbalah. Sefaria’s Sefer Yetzirah material gives the basic letter-zodiac map, and Rabbeinu Bahya also describes the 22 Hebrew letters as corresponding to wind/water/fire, the seven fixed stars/planets, and the 12 zodiac signs. [7] None of that requires tarot, and none of it suggests swapping Heh and Tzaddi. So if the test is “does this preserve Hebrew/Kabbalistic letter attribution?” the answer is no. Crowley’s swap is important and logical within Crowley’s initiatory tarot system, because it makes the Thoth deck’s symbolic architecture line up with his reading of Liber AL and with his desired zodiacal symmetry. But it is not logically compelled by Hebrew gematria or classical Jewish mysticism. It is a deliberate Thelemic override of the older Sefer Yetzirah-style correspondences — elegant as occult engineering, but not “kosher” as Hebrew-letter tradition. Crowley’s stated reason is this: Liber AL forced him to re-examine the inherited Golden Dawn tarot attributions. In Book of Thoth, he says the phrase “Tzaddi is not the Star” answered his own mental doubt about whether the old attributions were right. He says he tried for years to solve the problem, and only much later saw that The Star must be exchanged with The Emperor. The New Comment gives the same solution: Tzaddi = Emperor, Heh = Star, with Aries and Aquarius counterchanged. [8] The strongest technical reason he gives is zodiacal symmetry. Crowley says the earlier Golden Dawn correction had already swapped Justice and Strength, producing a balanced rotation around Virgo: Leo and Libra on either side of Virgo. His Emperor/Star swap creates a matching symmetry around Pisces: Aries and Aquarius on either side of Pisces. So the “why” is not primarily gematria; it is a structural correction to the zodiacal sequence of the tarot trumps. [9] The more interesting clue is that the command “Tzaddi is not the Star” appears in Liber AL immediately after language about the “law of the fortress” and the “House of God.” Crowley identifies the House of God with the Tower, Atu XVI, and in Book of Thoth he explicitly connects the Tower card to that verse. That matters because the Tower is Mars, while the Emperor is Aries, a Mars-ruled sign. So the hidden trail may run: House of God / Tower / Mars → Aries → Emperor, rather than simply “Star is wrong, swap two labels.” That is an inference, but it is a pretty strong one inside Crowley’s own symbolic map. [10] Crowley also gives a symbolic reason for why The Star becomes Heh. In Book of Thoth, The Star is Nuit, the Lady of the Stars, pouring from two vessels; he links the imagery to the Great Mother, Binah, the Sea, and Babalon as a materialization of Nuit. Elsewhere in the same chapter, he says it is natural for the Great Mother to be attributed to Heh, because Heh is “her letter” in Tetragrammaton. That is probably the most coherent internal reason for removing Heh from the Emperor and giving it to the Star. [11] For the opposite half, Crowley tries to justify why The Emperor becomes Tzaddi by phonetics and rulership imagery. In Book of Thoth, the Emperor is Aries, fiery authority, paternal creative force, and power descending from Chokmah to Tiphareth. He then says the sound-root TZ / TS appears in words of rulership such as Tsar, Czar, Caesar, Senior, Seigneur, Signor, and Sir. This is not traditional Hebrew gematria; it is Crowley’s comparative-philological occult wordplay. But within his system, it gives Tzaddi a “ruler” flavor rather than an “Aquarian Star” flavor. [12] There is also a striking breadcrumb in Book of Lies. In the commentary to “Ninety-One,” Crowley says 90 is the number of Tzaddi, and then describes “the Star” in its exoteric sense as the naked woman by the stream. That is fascinating because it suggests he already regarded the Tzaddi-Star attribution as a surface-level or outward meaning, not necessarily the final secret one. It is not the full solution, but it is exactly the kind of sideways hint one would expect from Crowley. [13] A second possible hidden clue appears in Liber Arcanorum. In the stanza numbered 4, corresponding to the Emperor position, Crowley writes of dominion being established in the “Star of the Flame.” That does not explicitly say “Tzaddi is the Emperor,” but it does entangle Emperor-number symbolism, dominion, star imagery, and fire/Horus imagery before the later Book of Thoth exposition. The stanza for 17, the Star position, also makes the “holy virgin” undergo a fiery transformation rather than presenting the Star as merely passive or watery. [14] But the cross-referencing also reveals a real problem. In Crowley’s older 777-style tables, the pre-swap system is clean: Heh = Aries = Emperor, and Tzaddi = Aquarius = Star. The Tree of Life paths also fit that older arrangement: the Aries/Emperor path joins Chokmah to Tiphareth, while the Aquarius/Star path joins Netzach to Yesod. Yet in Book of Thoth, after the swap, Crowley still describes the Emperor’s authority as descending from Chokmah to Tiphareth — the old Heh/Aries/Emperor path. So the swap is not a simple “put Emperor onto Tzaddi’s old Tree path.” It is more like Crowley is correcting the tarot-letter keys while preserving zodiacal and Tree-of-Life functions in a more complicated double register. [15] And there is one more complication from Liber Aleph: Crowley elsewhere says the “Letter of the Man” is Tzaddi, whose number is 90, and links it with Maim, water. That sounds much closer to the older Aquarius/man/water symbolism than to Aries/Emperor/fire. So across Crowley’s corpus, Tzaddi does not become purely “Emperor-like.” It retains older Aquarian and watery resonances even after the formal tarot correction. [16] Crowley’s real reason was not gematria. It was a Thelemic correction of tarot’s zodiacal architecture, triggered by Liber AL and solved through symmetry. The swap allowed him to make The Star into a more perfect image of Nuit / Heh / Great Mother, and The Emperor into Tzaddi / rulership / Aries / Horus-force. But the deeper one digs into his own symbolic tables, the more it looks like a deliberate esoteric override rather than a clean restoration of Hebrew-letter tradition. In other words: Crowley’s swap is internally meaningful, and (likely) not random. But it is “logical” in Crowley’s sense of symbolic Qabalah — poetic, geometrical, phonetic, initiatory — not in the stricter sense of Hebrew gematria or inherited Jewish letter astrology. In that is Thelema. Do What Thou Wilt, indeed. 93 93/93
  • Court Card Decanates

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    3k Views
    D
    I came to the forum after long-time-no-see with a question in mind to post and randomly checked here in Qabalah section to see what's new - to find this old thread that addresses, however in its own different way, exactly the subject of my question ! Does anyone know (ideally, historical info, with year/century and everything pertinent) when the Shemhamphorash started being attributed to the Zodiac, in sequence as we now have it?
  • Matrices in the book of Abramelin

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    U
    The thought has occurred to me regarding magical squares in a general sense. I intend to experiment a bit in a month or so. Possibly starting with Enochian tablets. If you want to work on the Abremelin, we can compare notes
  • Latin Simplex

    45
    0 Votes
    45 Posts
    32k Views
    D
    As I'm gradually working of translating Liber Legis into Latin, I'll be posting here periodically the most interesting findings, on the go. Here's some today's gems: BACULUM VIS COPH NIAE - Wand of the Force of Coph Nia = 175 (while Force of the Coph Nia itself - Vis Coph Niae = 110)
  • Maat sephiroth

    9
    0 Votes
    9 Posts
    5k Views
    T
    @gerry456 said "Actually yes, the paths are equally as important as the sephirah." And therefore Lamed marks the realm of Maat's Adlusting temple of Equilibrium, not a fixed number sphere. (Unless you want Maat to be a Messiah, then Six i guess.)
  • Lurianic Kabbalah

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    S
    Lurianic Kabballah is much as you'd think. There's Kether at the top, Malkuth at the bottom, the rest in between. Do you have any questions in particular regarding that particular field of Kabballah? Else, there are books written on the topic... Here's his poem. The Tree of Life by The ARI, a great 16th century Kabbalist Behold that before the emanations were emanated and the creatures were created, The upper simple light had filled the whole existence. And there was no vacancy, such as an empty atmosphere, a hollow, or a pit, But all was filled with simple, boundless light. And there was no such part as head, or tail, But everything was simple, smooth light, balanced evenly and equally, And it was called the Endless Light. And when upon His simple will, came the desire to create the world and emanate the emanations, To bring to light the perfection of His deeds, His names, His appellations, Which was the cause of the creation of the worlds, He then restricted Himself, in the middle, Precisely in the center, He restricted the light. And the light drew far off to the sides around that middle point. And there remained an empty space, a vacuum Circling the middle point. And the restriction had been uniform Around the empty point, So that the space Was evenly circled around it. There, after the restriction, Having formed a vacuum and a space Precisely in the middle of the endless light, A place was formed, Where the emanated and the created might reside. Then from the Endless Light a single line hung down, Lowered down into that space. And through that line, He emanated, created, formed, and Made all the worlds. Before these four worlds came to be There was one infinite, one name, in wondrous, hidden unity, And even in the angles closest to Him There is no force and no attainment in The Endless, As there is no mind that can perceive Him, For He has no place, no boundary, no name.
  • Tarot Mastery

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    S
    @seekinghga said "Farther and farther we float; yet we are still. It is the chain of systems that is falling away from us." It's not so much that the "systems" "fall away" as it is that we are divested of our conditioned proportion to them. The error of their seeming duality is acquitted by oneness. It is of consequence that petty, myopic, small-minded and divisive ideologies are stamped out in the indelible imputrescence of Love under Will; they cannot co-exist with that love (study this, if you so choose, in connection with 156; see Liber CDXVIII). This absolutely includes who and what we believe (read: think) that we are. "Light cleaveth unto Light, and filth to filth; with pride one contemneth another. But not Thou, who art all, and beyond it; who art absolved from the Division of the Shadows." Wending back to topic, the tarot can be a handy guide of reference for some and it is advisable to familiarize oneself with it. However, the study of it, and especially its divining potentials, are fallible to the lull and pull of the Ego and should be calculated as such. Its redeeming balance can come when it is applied solely to the Great Work; i.e. it is used as a means to dissolve the self-perpetuating, self-insisting complexities of belief. "There is no law beyond Do what thou wilt."
  • New Aeon Tarot: Adjustment and the Lovers

    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    6k Views
    L
    Everything is under control. The Lovers card is pretty complicated. I notice the two females together with the males produce some sort of formula or process. I can feel it but can't really articulate what it is. We also have Cupid or Karma shooting an arrow, a puppetmaster and a male statue and a female statue. Also the Ten of Swords (Ruin) is in the background. I wonder if the male and female statues are representing ideal male/female forms. I also wonder if they are actual famous statues from art history. Crowley references the Venus of Milo in the Book of Lies. The puppetmaster I also understand intuitively but don't really get. Who is this figure? He, plus Karma (Desire) seem to be motioning the Universe. The male/female dichotomy is in the card, but not as openly as in the Rider-Waite version of the card. We almost have the boys separated from the girls as in elementary school. Another New Aeon card I have been considering is the Aeon. The figure in front is an invisible-transparent Harpocrates and behind him we have Ra Hoor Kuit. I don't know much about Harpocrates symbolism (outside its association with silence) but the ideas I'm getting now are that Harpocrates is the Geist or Spirit, the Silent Philosopher standing and thinking. Behind him we have Ra Hoor Kuit, the Lord of the Aeon, ruling over Harpocrates' thoughts. We only have the thoughts we do due to the society we live in and the people we associate with. The thoughts we have are based on the knowledge we have as a society, which will change throughout history (the aeons). The thoughts of a person in ancient Greece will be different from a medieval monk which will be different from our current way of thinking. I also see Ra Hoor Kuit as the "current reterritorialization" of humanity; humanity's current, generalized map of reality. As I see it, if someone discovers something new or has an original idea, Ra Hoor Kuit's function is to allow that new idea to be expressed, if it is True, even if it differs from the expectations of humanity. What Harpocrates thinks is dependent on what Ra Hoor Kuit, the Aeon, allows him to think. It took time for atheism to become accepted. I wonder if this is because people expected others would start acting entirely out of control, breaking all the laws, etc. if atheism was widespread and no one believed in God. This is an extreme example; from an everyday perspective, what we think about is what everybody else thinks about, and our philosophy is kept on Earth by the genetic, God-given "What should I eat today?" and "I have to go to the bathroom", along with social behavior type thoughts. I think Harpocrates represents the Thinker of the one Thought, the once-in-a-while stroke-of-genius thought that occurs outside of the banalities. But this is just my opinion and my development of my own philosophy.
  • Heliocentric view in Qabbalah & Tarot, practice?

    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    6k Views
    T
    The magician has a man's view The mystic has a god's view Choose your system well
  • 3 Alchemical symbols and the Tarot Major Arcana

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    M
    Yes, but Crowley's Thoth Tarot specifically labels 7 planets, 12 zodiac signs and 5 elements in the Major Arcana. My question was why he decided to label the 5 elements coming to to 24 symbols instead of 3 Alchemical symbols coming to exactly 22 symbols?
  • How is the number of Qlipoth 11?

    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    2k Views
    F
    After nearly a month, I've found the answer: the Qlippah that corresponds to Kether, Thaumiel (The Twins of God), is split in two.
  • Different order of Sephiroth?

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    2k Views
    A
    I finished reading this book. It was a fascinating read. It explained mathematical concepts for the layperson, and it also went into the personal lives of famous mathematicians. It explained ideas about infinity that were fascinating. I haven't looked up his source for his information on the Kabalah, so I still don't get that. I see that my public library system has it - "Kabbalah and Consciousness" by Allen Afterman - but I am so busy, not sure when I will get to it.
  • What is your interpretation of YHVH?

    10
    0 Votes
    10 Posts
    5k Views
    G
    Jealous megalomanical anti-humanist demon who* demands * worship and submission to* it alone* and wants to keep us enslaved in darkness, hurt, suffering and ignorance? 'Now a man or a woman who is a medium or a spiritist shall surely be put to death. They shall be stoned with stones, their bloodguiltiness is upon them.'" Leviticus 20:27 You may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way.* Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man intimately. But all the girls who have not known man intimately, spare for yourselves.* Numbers 31:17-18 When a woman has a discharge, if her discharge in her body is blood, she shall continue in her menstrual impurity for seven days; and whoever touches her shall be unclean until evening. Everything also on which she lies during her menstrual impurity shall be unclean, and everything on which she sits shall be unclean. Leviticus 15: 19-20 When men fight with one another, and the wife of the one draws near to rescue her husband from the hand of him who is beating him, and puts out her hand and seizes him by the private parts, then you shall cut off her hand. Deuteronomy 25:11-12 www.salon.com/2014/05/31/11_kinds_of_bible_verses_christians_love_to_ignore_partner so on.
  • Jewish Hell Qabbalistic Correspondance

    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    2k Views
    T
    Thanks, Benji! I made a connection to my previous studies, though in my memory, it listed different hells for different religions, almost by element I think. Is there another correspondance book out besides 777 and Jim's 777? Thanks
  • Quality Posts

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • Let's Chill

    16
    0 Votes
    16 Posts
    7k Views
    A
    @Asisa said "=so=> www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIHDz4u214c -i guess- " www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6RsIKdkVfk with hmmmmmmmm.... Music-Change!
  • Brain twins

    4
    0 Votes
    4 Posts
    3k Views
    A
    @Asisa said ":?: So that thy light is in me; & its red flame is as a sword in my hand to push thy order. There is a secret door that I shall make to establish thy way in all the quarters, (these are the adorations, as thou hast written), as it is said:" So... The light is mine; its rays consume Me: I have made a secret door Into the House of Ra and Tum, Of Khephra and of Ahathoor ( another, i think ). I am THY Theban, O Mentu, The prophet Ankh-af-na-khonsu! By Bes-na-Maut my breast I beat; By wise Ta-Nech I weave MY SPELL. Show thy STAR-SPLENDOUR, O Nuit! Bid me within thine House to dwell, O wingèd snake of light, Hadit! Abide with me, Ra-Hoor-Khuit!
  • How to become a veiled Master

    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    3k Views
    A
    Abrahadabra; the reward of Ra-Hoor-Khuit. Done!: <=> Adam&Kristen
  • Brad Bitt

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied
  • I'm (e) Port and(logic)

    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    1k Views
    No one has replied