Crowley's conception about life after death
-
@Diogenos said
"As far as I remember, To Mega Therion believed in reincarnation"
Well, at least Aleister Crowley did.
"for instance, he explained he was in another life John Dee or Eliphas Levi"
Edward Kelley and Eliphas Levi, yes. Also at least one other well known occult name.
"Nevertheless, did Crowley give a true explanation about what will happen to every single person after death ? "
Yes: In the Mass, he said it's according to their choice.
-
What does that exactly means ? Is there something similar to hell or heaven in Thelema ? Is there any possibility for after life to be an eternal suffering place or a land of felicity for ever ? In my own understanding, it would not be possible since To Mega Therions created a nondualistic system ; nevertheless, this conception does exists in many religions in the world.
I would be curious to know thelemite's opinion on that topic
-
@Diogenos said
"What does that exactly means ? Is there something similar to hell or heaven in Thelema ?"
Not a specific "something." Rather, an entire range of optional experiences: Move on to the reality you next choose.
"Is there any possibility for after life to be an eternal suffering place or a land of felicity for ever ? "
"Forever" is a long time. the answer is no - No such thing. No hell at all unless it is a hell a person creates for themselves. The same with 'felicity.' You create the reality into which you move, whether it is in life or outside of life. (Actually, it's all life: Sometimes with a physical body, sometimes without.) Definitely no "final reward," because existence is clearly deemed to be ever in motion, ever moving on.
"I would be curious to know thelemite's opinion on that topic
"That's opening a can of worms likely to result in nothing but argument. There are as many opinions as there are individuals. I've tried to answer from the point of view of To Mega Therion, not the point of view of self-identified Thelemites.
-
Just a more question related with pacts with demons : I am only a beginner in Thelema's science, but I know commiting pacts with that kind of entities does exist, but it is not recommanded according to Crowley. Many stories about pacts with demons exist in popular tales, but can you "sell" your soul to a demon ? If yes, what is its consequences ? Do you finish in an hellish state of mind according to To Mega Therion ?
I know everything is impermanent in thelemic philosophy, including life after death ; but is this a special case ? Maybe my vision of it is influenced by Faust and that kind of old stories...Thank you by advance, sorry for my lack of documentation and culture about that topic
-
When you sign a contract, you usually are acting on there assumption that the other party can deliver their quid for yours, and, if necessary, that they can enforce your compliance.
Neither side of this is necessarily correct, especially when you thought you were contracting with the CFO and it turns out that you were dealing with the janitor.
-
Nevertheless, I just read that concluding a pact with a demon could be nothing more than an illusion : nothing in exchange of nothing, to resume it...
To conclude, even if a magician wants to sell his soul to a demon, what would be the consequences for him in his life and afterlife ? -
@Diogenos said
"Nevertheless, I just read that concluding a pact with a demon could be nothing more than an illusion : nothing in exchange of nothing, to resume it... "
That's what I said above
"To conclude, even if a magician wants to sell his soul to a demon, what would be the consequences for him in his life and afterlife ?"
Is it a real demon? If so, does it have any authority? (Why a demon - a pathetic little drone - instead of a being of stature such as Belial?)
And what do you mean by "soul" in this case? There are too many vagaries.
One certainly can't bind one's post-mortem existence to a pathetic drone imp unless there is some personally profound reason, such as love or, on the other extreme, one is decorating a personal hell for one's self-humiliation for some reason. It would be quite personal with thousands of individual variations. But, to go to a variation of my prior metaphor: No matter what handshake deal you make with the shoeshine guy in your office building, he really doesn't have anything to say about where you have lunch after you leave the building and go on about your way.
-
Well, I do not really know the definition of "soul" in Thelema... Maybe this is the origin of my misunderstanding right above.
You mentionned only little drones as demons ; but what would happen if you deal with an higher entity such as Belial (as you named him) or Satan himself ? -
@Diogenos said
"You mentionned only little drones as demons ; but what would happen if you deal with an higher entity such as Belial (as you named him) or Satan himself ?"
Most people wouldn't have the capacity to do so. It requires someone consciously awake to the World of Briah - an adept - to connect to the great Briatic beings such as the "Four Great Princes of the Evil of the World," Satan, Lucifer, Leviathan, and Belial. Rightly trained, an Adept at a fairly early stage would have bound these in obedience to his or her Holy Guardian Angel.
But - in your totally speculative scenario (and these are always dangerous to answer because, well, they're speculative and the answer is too narrow to generalize, but people will try to generalize),,, If an Adept did such a thing as you suggest, it would be both highly unusual and of some particular karmic implication unique to that Adept. It could be a horrible mistake - it could be an enormous act of High Magick - there are too many variables. A Major Adept at the very least should have the resources both to recognize the karmic implications instinctively and to know the magical implications; but, I suppose, if the power urge within the Major Adept exceeded the intimacy of his or her connection to the HGA, then anything is possible.
Mostly, the answer is that this isn't a realistic scenario in close to 100% of the cases. Don't worry about what the Russian President might do if he cornered you, since he isn't likely to return your phone call in the first place.
-
In fact, the center of my question is "Is everything impermanent in Thelema ?". You told me in a preview post that we can not be rewarded forever, but how about punishment ? If you sell your soul to a major dark entity, would that have an end ?
I guess yes since the law of karma is involved, but your advice would be welcome
-
@Diogenos said
"In fact, the center of my question is "Is everything impermanent in Thelema ?". You told me in a preview post that we can not be rewarded forever, but how about punishment ? If you sell your soul to a major dark entity, would that have an end ?"
No eternal reward or punishment. I'm not sure that even the ideas of reward or punishment persist very far beyond death. (There are documented cases of 'ghosts' etc. in self-punishing or other morbid states for years or decades, and even that is pitifully small in the face of eternity.)
Is it that "everything is impermanent in Thelema"? I think Buddha had it right, and everything is impermanent - at least in Assiah and Yetirah - in all of creation. The answer to your question is probably "yes," though I'd put it differently - that foreclosing possibilities doesn't fit with the idea of Nuit as a field containing all possibilities.
-
@Diogenos said
"One question at last : are there any referenced texts by Crowley that deal with life after death ?"
Stuff scattered there in the Commentaries, a little in Liber Aleph, Magick in Theory & Practice, other writings... I've never compiled them, the theme was pretty consistent through all of it.
-
Thanks Jim
Just a quotation by To Mega Therion to finish this interesting and very explaining conversation :
“One’s ‘immortal soul’ is a different kind of thing altogether from one’s mortal vesture. This Soul is a particular Star, with its own peculiar qualities, of course; but these qualities are all ‘eternal,’ and part of the nature of the Soul. This Soul being a monistic consciousness, it is unable to appreciate itself and its qualities, as explained in a previous entry; so it realizes itself by the device of duality, with the limitations of time, space and causality.”
... "Everything is impermanent" isn't so far.
-
Exactly?
I mean it's difficult to discern your tone from your use of English, but you "sound" like you're finding what you think are inconsistencies, as when you said, "'Everything is impermanent' isn't so far."
And I'm recommending this book to you as representative of the general esoteric understanding of death and afterlife, something which Crowley seems to have been familiar with, so that you may get a better picture of it than you can by trying to piece together this or that quote about impermanence, etc., solely from his own writings.
-
@kasper81 said
"4) Where in the Book of the Law does it refer to or state that reincarnation is real or a necessary part of Thelema?"
How is that relevant?
Ford Mustangs aren't in the Book of the Law, but that has no bearing on whether they're real or not. As far as "necessary part of Thelema", is someone making that claim?