Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∴A∴
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

Who says that KEK is against Nu Hadit and Horus?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Thelema
33 Posts 7 Posters 4.5k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G gerry456

    Why the assumption?

    G Offline
    G Offline
    gerry456
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @Gnosomai Emauton said

    "
    What do you mean by "therefore the whole pantheon is inherently valid"? Valid for what? "

    Any god from a pantheon is not inherently isolated from the other gods in that pantheon is it?

    @Gnosomai Emauton said

    "
    And why does the visual representation of three of the Thelemic Gods taken from an ancient stele necessarily validate the religion under which that stele was created,"

    As above ie. what I wrote above.

    @Gnosomai Emauton said

    "
    especially considering that the Thelemic personification of these Gods bears little to no correlation to the Khemite Gods that originally inspired the image?"

    No correlation? Where and what are the differences?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G gerry456

      Why the assumption?

      A Offline
      A Offline
      Avshalom Binyamin
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      Every man and every woman is a star.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G gerry456

        Why the assumption?

        G Offline
        G Offline
        gerry456
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        @Avshalom Binyamin said

        "Every man and every woman is a star."

        Thankyou. Is that relevant?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G gerry456

          Why the assumption?

          G Offline
          G Offline
          gerry456
          wrote on last edited by
          #10

          @Gnosomai Emauton said

          "[
          What do you mean by "therefore the whole pantheon is inherently valid"? Valid for what? And why does the visual representation of three of the Thelemic Gods taken from an ancient stele necessarily validate the religion under which that stele was created, especially considering that the Thelemic personification of these Gods bears little to no correlation to the Khemite Gods that originally inspired the image?"

          pantheon
          /*ˈpanθɪən/

          noun

          noun: pantheon; plural noun: pantheons

          all the gods of a people or religion collectively.
          "the deities of the Hindu pantheon"
          •(especially in ancient Greece and Rome) a temple dedicated to all the gods.
          2.
          **a group **of famous or important people.
          "the pantheon of the all-time greats"
          *

          The word "god" therefore, y'know in the polytheistic context, is a jigsaw. Have you ever seen a jigsaw that consisted of one or two or three pieces?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • G gerry456

            Why the assumption?

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Avshalom Binyamin
            wrote on last edited by
            #11

            @gerry456 said

            "
            @Avshalom Binyamin said
            "Every man and every woman is a star."

            Thankyou. Is that relevant?"

            Yes. Kek is a symbol of white supremacy.

            Nu, Hadit, and Horus, in the context of this forum, are Thelemic deities. They are not ancient Egyptian deities.

            Kek is not a Thelemic deity. In a contemporary context, Kek is incompatible with some of the basic, core principles of Thelema. In the context of ancient Egypt, Kek is about as relevant to Thelema as any other dead frog.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • G gerry456

              Why the assumption?

              S Offline
              S Offline
              seekinghga
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              @gerry456 said

              "up to Chesed? You mean the grade system identificationsof attainment?"

              No, I mean Chesed as in limitation; the closest to the summit that the mind can hope to reach. Picture a square-shaped circle. You can not do it. This is indicative of the limitations of the the human mind. It illustrates how deeply rooted our mind's attachment to concepts is, the roots having been sown and nurtured since birth. Reason cannot pierce beyond Chesed for Reason is fed by the Abyss; i.e. the "substance" of the Abyss is the vehicle of Reason. (Compare the meaning of reason to the idea of Demiurge.) Reason is valuable only in so far as it is constantly kept in perspective, which is accomplished by abiding in Silence or Light or Equilibrium or whatever other half-true description it pleases anyone to label it with (it's called K&CotHGA in the Thelemic vernacular).

              How does this relate to your post? You said that the Egyptian gods are relevant to Thelema and I am saying that that is a concept and a quite incorrect one, even as concepts go. 😉

              Dig this:

              @Avshalom Binyamin said

              "Nu, Hadit, and Horus, in the context of this forum, are Thelemic deities. They are not ancient Egyptian deities. "

              In addition to the quote above, gerry, the Thelemic deities borrow from the Egyptian ones for many aspects of their symbolism, but do not forget that such symbolism exists solely within the Reason and can but only point to that which requires a "different" way of seeing things to fully grasp.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • G gerry456

                Why the assumption?

                G Offline
                G Offline
                Gnosomai Emauton
                wrote on last edited by
                #13

                @gerry456 said

                "pantheon
                /ˈpanθɪən/..."
                Yes, I know what the word pantheon means. My question to you was: "Valid for what?"

                @gerry456 said

                "No correlation? Where and what are the differences?"
                The gods painted on the stele 2700 years ago are:

                Nut = The sky goddess. Lover of Geb (the earth) her husband/brother/complement. Daughter of Shu & Tefnut, granddaughter of Atum.
                Behedeti = The Winged Sun. Avatar of Horus. Symbol of royalty and power.
                Ra-Horakhty = Ra who is Horus of the Two Horizons (i.e., the Sun as it travels from sunrise to sunset)

                The gods as interpreted by Aleister Crowley are:

                Nuit = The continuous one of heaven. The context of all that is. The co-creator of existence as lover and equal of her Lord Hadit.
                Hadit = The unseen and all-seeing point. The observer of all that is. The co-creator of existence as lover and equal of his Lady Nuit.
                Ra-Hoor-Khuit = A God of War and Vengeance. An avatar of Horus as the ever-borning Child of Nuit & Hadit's infinite embrace (i.e. HGA). Twin of Hoor-Paar-Kraat and half of HeruRaHa.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G gerry456

                  Why the assumption?

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  gerry456
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  I get it so AC has taken those deity-ideas and warped their definition for his own purpose?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • G gerry456

                    Why the assumption?

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    Gnosomai Emauton
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    That's not how I would characterize it.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G gerry456

                      Why the assumption?

                      S Offline
                      S Offline
                      seekinghga
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      @Gnosomai Emauton said

                      "That's not how I would characterize it."

                      Well, that simply won't make matters better. Gnosomai Emauton, you have some 'splainin' to do!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • G gerry456

                        Why the assumption?

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        gerry456
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        @seekinghga said

                        "
                        @Gnosomai Emauton said
                        "That's not how I would characterize it."

                        Well, that simply won't make matters better. Gnosomai Emauton, you have some 'splainin' to do!"

                        The anticipation is too much 😐

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • G gerry456

                          Why the assumption?

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          seekinghga
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          @gerry456 said

                          "The anticipation is too much 😐"

                          😀

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G gerry456

                            Why the assumption?

                            G Offline
                            G Offline
                            Gnosomai Emauton
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            @seekinghga said

                            "
                            Well, that simply won't make matters better. Gnosomai Emauton, you have some 'splainin' to do!"

                            Of what?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • G gerry456

                              Why the assumption?

                              G Offline
                              G Offline
                              gerry456
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              @Gnosomai Emauton said

                              "
                              @seekinghga said
                              "
                              Well, that simply won't make matters better. Gnosomai Emauton, you have some 'splainin' to do!"

                              Of what?"

                              Presumably you disputed my I get it so AC has taken those deity-ideas and warped their definition for his own purpose? line.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • G gerry456

                                Why the assumption?

                                G Offline
                                G Offline
                                Gnosomai Emauton
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                Best not to presume, then. It's really not possible for me to dispute anything since you still haven't clarified what you think all this is "valid" for or why you felt it important to raise these questions in the first place. The stream of one-line questions without any sort of actual thinking on the issues you purport to be interested in, thus far, signals nothing deeper than your standard internet fishing expedition. Trolling for KEK, as it were.

                                I simply didn't want your words to be interpreted as anything close what I would say on that tangent.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • G gerry456

                                  Why the assumption?

                                  G Offline
                                  G Offline
                                  gerry456
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  @Gnosomai Emauton said

                                  "Best not to presume, then. It's really not possible for me to dispute anything since you still haven't clarified what you think all this is "valid" for or why you felt it important to raise these questions in the first place. The stream of one-line questions without any sort of actual thinking on the issues you purport to be interested in, thus far, signals nothing deeper than your standard internet fishing expedition. Trolling for KEK, as it were.

                                  I simply didn't want your words to be interpreted as anything close what I would say on that tangent."

                                  Paranoid much?

                                  I thought Crowley was using genuine Egyptian dieties.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • G gerry456

                                    Why the assumption?

                                    S Offline
                                    S Offline
                                    seekinghga
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #23

                                    "I am alone: there is no God where I am."

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • G gerry456

                                      Why the assumption?

                                      G Offline
                                      G Offline
                                      gerry456
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      @seekinghga said

                                      ""I am alone: there is no God where I am.""

                                      What about angels and spirits? Any of them there?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • G gerry456

                                        Why the assumption?

                                        T Offline
                                        T Offline
                                        Takamba
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        @gerry456 said

                                        "
                                        @seekinghga said
                                        ""I am alone: there is no God where I am.""

                                        What about angels and spirits? Any of them there?"

                                        "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together."

                                        ponder that.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • G gerry456

                                          Why the assumption?

                                          G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          gerry456
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          I've been watching some Alt Right videos on youtube.

                                          It's fascism. Watered down, techno savvy fear-mongering, racialist crap.

                                          These mouth pieces like Spence are in it for themselves ultimately. For their own careers. Yes we have Islamic fascism and intolerance..... but you don't fight fire with fire....two wrongs don't make a right.....pun intended.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups