Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∴A∴
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

I:N:R:I Formula and Grade Signs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Pearls of Wisdom
5 Posts 3 Posters 931 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Offline
    M Offline
    Mr Menthu
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    On page 94, there is the wonderful version of the INRI formula in a Thelemic style. I was just wondering, do you employ the N.O.X or L.V.X signs when doing this, and at what point?

    Thank you.

    J M H 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • M Mr Menthu

      On page 94, there is the wonderful version of the INRI formula in a Thelemic style. I was just wondering, do you employ the N.O.X or L.V.X signs when doing this, and at what point?

      Thank you.

      J Offline
      J Offline
      Jim Eshelman
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @Mr Menth said

      "On page 94, there is the wonderful version of the INRI formula in a Thelemic style. I was just wondering, do you employ the N.O.X or L.V.X signs when doing this, and at what point?"

      Thank you for the compliment, and it's a great question, one I didn't anticipate.

      Answer: Neither. It's past both formulae. It was written for Chokmah where the older formulae cease to express themselves. NOX ends at Biynah.

      If used at a lower part of the tree, then, of course, you may insert what seems appropriate to you. Remember that the LVX signs are the specific grade signs of Tifereth, and the NOX signs are the grade signs of G'boorah through Biynah.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Mr Menthu

        On page 94, there is the wonderful version of the INRI formula in a Thelemic style. I was just wondering, do you employ the N.O.X or L.V.X signs when doing this, and at what point?

        Thank you.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mr Menthu
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Thanks Jim,

        I tested this out this morning and got fantastic results. Before I was using the formula in Tiphareth, which was "effective", but, using the formula in Chokmah was "ecstatic"; and I prefer ecstatic over effective, it gets the holy juices going. 🍸

        Cheers

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mr Menthu

          On page 94, there is the wonderful version of the INRI formula in a Thelemic style. I was just wondering, do you employ the N.O.X or L.V.X signs when doing this, and at what point?

          Thank you.

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Jim Eshelman
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Thanks for the feedback. Enjoy 😄

          PS - I assume you read the footnote (the summary of conclusions from an early Liber Nu practice) that explain it just a bit more? I think that footnote and the text itself will give people an explanation if they want one.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mr Menthu

            On page 94, there is the wonderful version of the INRI formula in a Thelemic style. I was just wondering, do you employ the N.O.X or L.V.X signs when doing this, and at what point?

            Thank you.

            H Offline
            H Offline
            Hermitas
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @Mr Menth said

            "On page 94, there is the wonderful version of the INRI formula in a Thelemic style. I was just wondering, do you employ the N.O.X or L.V.X signs when doing this, and at what point?

            Thank you."

            Ah, here's the old thread I was looking for. The reference to page 94 is even more valuable. I was stopping with the instruction on the Lesser and not reading the Greater Ritual of the Hexagram instructions nor the addendum. Not there yet.

            Thank you for that analysis.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Users
            • Groups