Chaos Magick

Edward Mason

Nick, 93,

You said:

" I have been lead to understand chaos magick it doesn't have one particular focus such as accomplishing the Great Work. Rather the focus is to make the practitioner more efficient at reaching his or her personal goals. "

Sure, and the magician is presumably exploring some aspect of True Will by going through all this, even if he/she rejects the value of the TW or the K&C. So, depending on the practitioner, it may or may not be a useful activity, at least in a limited time-frame.

I can't be bothered to explore Chaos Magick too deeply, because I wonder what value personally - i.e., egoically - chosen goals had for anyone involved in magick. I've avoided the few people I've met who claim to be into Chaos, simply because I didn't feel sympatico with them.

The only reasons I have for posting on this topic are (a) I think the idea that Chaos Magick is related to Thelema is confusing some people because the statements of some practitioners in both areas can seen similar, and (b) I think that constant disruption of consciousness and the perpetually generated environment in which it operates is unlikely to bring anyone to a useful understanding or to greater happiness.

93 93/93,

Edward

redd fezz

I'm inclined to agree with everything Edward just said. The only reasons I've personally ever really wanted to learn about the occult were to know what the hell life was all about and, hopefully, knowing this or coming closer to learning this, would give me a secure enough grounding to cut out an enjoyable niche for myself that wasn't plagued with worry, guilt or too much doubt.

Yes, I want to know God, essentially, first and foremost, whether it's a clockworks God or whatever. I think I have come closer to understanding-- and I do think Chaos ideas have helped, actually -- REMEMBER: Austin Osman Spare is said to have been able to do ANYTHING... and he chose to do NOTHING!

Another important "Chaote," Ray Sherwin, was absolutely militant about his schedule/ritual in the "Book of Results."

So, right there, you have two very important "chaos magicians" who don't 'fit the bill' regarding "chaos magicians." I have every reason to believe the "big names in Chaos" seriously focused on K&C w/HGA or serious Knowledge, in general, in the case with Spare. Spare, Sherwin, Carroll, Hine and Dukes are no slouches.

Jim Eshelman

@Edward Mason said

"Still the real transition to the K&C (I believe) involves a difficult period of dissolution of the outer structures of the psyche."

Yes, that can particularly occur in the Dominus Liminis stage - or, of course, in any preliminary stage where something needs to be shaken loose. But, all the lead-up having been done, Dom Lim particularly is a time when layers are peeled back (to change the more common metaphor).

But the K&C itself is integrative - dissolving, but not disintegrating, singularizing and differentiating rather than diffusing etc.

Then again, for each person the preliminary requirements and the actual nature of the experience will be unique. I speak, at best, of the general case.

Shunyata

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law

@sasha said

"
@bethata418 said
"on chaos magick i personal think its black magick, due to from what i have heard says that it does not believe in an HGA and therefore they dont use magick to help thereselves become closer to there HGA."

But this only makes sense within the context of Thelema - and maybe the Golden Dawn. The philosophy of chaos magic argues against using the standards and goals of one system as absolute truth to judge another system. Of course, you don't have to accept that. But I think it makes great sense. Who cares if an HGA really exists or not, as long as we can get the results?"

Let us not forget Crowley's own words:(Liber ABA page 151(book four part 3 chapter 2))

@Uncle Al said

"He who became the Master Therion was once confronted by this very difficulty. Being determined to instruct mankind, He sought a simple statement of his object. His will was sufficiently informed by common sense to decide him to teach man "The Next Step", the thing which was immediately above him. He might have called this "God", or "The Higher Self", or "The Augoeides", or "Adi-Buddha", or 61 other things --- but He had discovered that these were all one, yet that each one represented some theory of the Universe which would ultimately be shattered by criticism --- for He had already passed through the realm of Reason, and knew that every statement contained an absurdity. He therefore said: "Let me declare this Work under this title: 'The obtaining of the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angel'", because the theory implied in these words is so patently absurd that only simpletons would waste much time in analysing it. It would be accepted as a convention, and no one would incur the grave danger of building a philosophical system upon it.

With this understanding, we may rehabilitate the Hebrew system of invocations. The mind is the great enemy; so, by invoking enthusiastically a person whom we know not to exist, we are rebuking that mind."

redd fezz

Great post, AC! I didn't realize that... even sounds like Crowley didn't believe in his HGA..??? But, clearly he did. He even goes so far as to claim Aiwaz an external entity. I guess he never convinced Regardie of this, but he himself was convinced.

Shunyata

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law

@Redd Fezz said

"Great post, AC! I didn't realize that... even sounds like Crowley didn't believe in his HGA..??? But, clearly he did. He even goes so far as to claim Aiwaz an external entity. I guess he never convinced Regardie of this, but he himself was convinced."

I don't remember where he wrote it (if someone does please remind me I would like to quote it from the source) but the Beast wrote somewhere in his writings something to the effect of "such a man believes a thing not because it is true, but because it must be believed to be true for the purpose of the act".

Those are the words of a Magus. The Magus has seen beyond all realities and may pick and choose from realities as he sees fit. He understands the unreality of all reality tunnels. He is the great weaver. Weaving reality (illusion) for all those around him.

redd fezz

Wow, so he really was a chaos magician.

Shunyata

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law

@Redd Fezz said

"Wow, so he really was a chaos magician."

I wouldn't say that. It is my impression of chaos magick that it was concieved of by men who had seen beyond the veil of illusion and they are trying to keep their practitioners from ever settling into a "reality tunnel". However, despite their efforts it seems to me that their "lack of a reality tunnel" equates into a "reality tunnel" of it's own. For the "lack of a reality tunnel" is itself just as false as the "absoluteness" of a "reality tunnel". If you catch my drift.

All realities are false, including the reality that "all realities are false".

LOL

Such is the conundrum.

gerry456

@Chris Hanlon said

"Could everyone speak more about chaos magic, please? I believe it is a combination of different traditions, picking and choosing what to implement in the way of ritual or study.
Nick,

======

i hear that chaos magick is said to be incorporated into the even newer aeon of the double current of Maat-Horus i.e. an augmentation of Thelema

zeph

@gerry456 said

"i hear that chaos magick is said to be incorporated into the even newer aeon of the double current of Maat-Horus i.e. an augmentation of Thelema"

When did this newer aeon begin? I'm so out of the loop...

DavidH

I didn't get that memo either!

ShadowDancer

I have only recently been introduced to the concept of chaos magic. I have obtained one very important verification from my exposure to the concept. (as I understand it)

 If a person can make literally any process a strong enough focus for mind to transform the existing mental/physical reality into something more pleasing... then it's not the process at all, it's focus and clarity of mind and desire.  (I know, eons old 'news-flash')  

 Following that train of thought, no process/system at all would be required for a person to express their full potential if they had sufficient focus and a pure desire.

 Of course, a good process/system can be really helpful for getting a person to that state. ;-)

L.V.X.
Shadowdancer

jmiller

@gerry456 said

"i hear that chaos magick is said to be incorporated into the even newer aeon of the double current of Maat-Horus i.e. an augmentation of Thelema"

You probably mean the aeonic systems published by Peter Carroll in Liber Null & Psychonaut and Liber Kaos. His model doesn't follow from Crowley's. He created an entirely seperate one - actually two. He uses 4 aeons in one and 5 in the other. But, again, they have nothing to do with Thelema, Liber L, or Crowley.

I recommend reading Liber Null if you want to learn more about chaos magic in general. But keep in mind that Carroll doesn't solely define chaos magic by any means. Also see Phil Hine's website. hilhine.org.uk

LPD Nu

Hi,

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

">gerry456 wrote:
i hear that chaos magick is said to be incorporated into the even newer aeon of the double current of Maat-Horus i.e. an augmentation of Thelema

You probably mean the aeonic systems published by Peter Carroll in Liber Null & Psychonaut and Liber Kaos. "

Are those systems related to what Nema talks about in her book, 'Ma'at Magic'?

Her approach looks to be very Thelemic. Actually just an extention of that Aeon into this one such that they co-exist. It appears to me that she doesn't consider the two 'currents' to be of equal proportion in 'spacetime' either. Anyway, I happened to read that title and got a lot out of it irregardless of my personal opinion on such a system.

Also, as far as chaos magic is concerned, the 'highest levels' of any discipline, in my assessment, should share the same 'characteristics' whether the entity initiated is a 'transcendent golfer' or a Magus. To me, the apparent lack of structure in chaos magic is very much (as sasha says) a reality tunnel. What little I've encountered is, for someone early on the path as a magician, just asking for a whole lot of trouble or at least wasting a whole lot of time. As far as I can tell, the basic postulates of 'chaos magick' run like this:

The early trio of G.'.D.'. founders heavily edited, synthesized, and collated a ton of material and got certain results from putting it into use. Crowley did the same.

Shamanism is 'idio-systematic' with 'systems' that were often practices within a 'family', whether biological or not. This is much like what's found in the martial arts. My point is that the 'process' would be fairly arbitrary.

Since roughly Heisenberg's famous statement regarding measurement and the human mind, the birth of nuclear weapons testing, and the death of Crowley, there is no other law besides intention, intention under ego.

I would say that's a hefty check to cash out of any one's 'account' be it a neophyte or a Magus, but to do it without the discipline of getting to K & C of one's HGA is like trying to calculate a tragectory to Mars from inside a cave without instruments and no experience in math--you'd better be one hell of a savant.

Of course my opinions are simply that.

Also, I haven't been very impressed by such people as I've met who have professed to be 'chaos magicians'. However, that could be due to many reasons. Not the least of which would be that someone who professes to be such with little or no prompting is simply a braggart and a fool and a 'real' 'chaos magician' far different in behavior. I hope so. I would gladly welcome anyone's success on 'the path'.

Love is the law, love under will.

Regards,

Fr Z. T.

jmiller

@Zo Telegraphema said

"
">gerry456 wrote:
i hear that chaos magick is said to be incorporated into the even newer aeon of the double current of Maat-Horus i.e. an augmentation of Thelema

You probably mean the aeonic systems published by Peter Carroll in Liber Null & Psychonaut and Liber Kaos. "

Are those systems related to what Nema talks about in her book, 'Ma'at Magic'?"

Who? Me? No, not at all. Like I said, Carroll's aeonic systems have nothing to do with Thelema, in any version whatsoever. Zo described Nema's system, which she builds from Crowley and Liber L. Carroll has nothing to do with that.

jmiller

Download this book for a basic intro to chaos magic.

hilhine.org.uk/writings/index_e-books.html

gerry456

@zeph said

"
@gerry456 said
"i hear that chaos magick is said to be incorporated into the even newer aeon of the double current of Maat-Horus i.e. an augmentation of Thelema"

When did this newer aeon begin? I'm so out of the loop..."

====
1974 according to some sources. The horus-maat lodge to be precise.

goto www.horusmaat.com