Comment D

Shunyata

Is comment D officially listed as Class B or Class A

Gideon Jagged

None of the commentaries to Liber L. is class A.

Dan

@Almighty Creator said

"Is comment D officially listed as Class B or Class A"

Jim Eshelman

@Almighty Creator said

"Is comment D officially listed as Class B or Class A"

The copy of D I have is unclassified. Offhand, I can't recall any of the commentaries being classified. (They seem to me to be in the Class C vein, occasionally wandering B-ish - but they weren't really ranked.)

Aum418

@Jim Eshelman said

"
@Almighty Creator said
"Is comment D officially listed as Class B or Class A"

The copy of D I have is unclassified. Offhand, I can't recall any of the commentaries being classified. (They seem to me to be in the Class C vein, occasionally wandering B-ish - but they weren't really ranked.)"

C would seem an accurate designation.

Shunyata

Yeah, B-C is my take as well. Although, I think "The Comment" is Class A, and in Equinox V no. 1 (with Motta's commentary) Motta states that Crowley's commentary in that text he lists officially as class B.

Jim Eshelman

@Almighty Creator said

"Yeah, B-C is my take as well."

I should clarify (sicne I sorta started this) that we are only talking about the feel of the documents - where they would be classified if they had actually been classified. But the comment wasn't classified. It has no class.

"Although, I think "The Comment" is Class A"

One modern Crowley scholar started that labelling. Crowley didn't. It also has no class.

"and in Equinox V no. 1 (with Motta's commentary) Motta states that Crowley's commentary in that text he lists officially as class B."

"He" who? Motta or Crowley? (I'm not remembering any reference where Crowley categorized it.)

See Appendix E in The Mystical & Magical System of the A.'.A.'. for the most complete and accurate catalogue of classified documents known to me.

Shunyata

@Jim Eshelman said

""He" who? Motta or Crowley?"

It was Motta. And thanks for the clarification Jim.