How Thelemites were governed...
-
@Frater Pantha said
"
@Draco Magnus said
"93,"what do most of you think was the most special thing that Crowley did in his life?"
1)Crossing the Abyss, and 2)attaining to the K&C of the HGA.
"
what do most of the people on here think that Crowley's original and important gifts to mankind were?"The Book of the Law.
93, 93/93"
Draco,
I think I see where you are coming from, but even the concept of the HGA pre-dates Crowley.
If The Book of the Law was the most original and important gift to mankind I guess I might ask why? Gerry seems to think it was in large part because in it he predicts a war. There was another World War that happened after Crowley wrote Liber AL , but before the war of the 40's. Crowley wasn't stupid; on some level in his travels don't you think he could sense war was coming due to the tensions at the time? Just like I can sense more war coming now? With maybe Iran? Or China?"If you think the coolest and most intriguing thing about Liber AL is that it might have predicted a historical event, I think you may be looking with the wrong emphasis...
IAO131
-
@Frater Pantha said
"
@Draco Magnus said
"93,"what do most of you think was the most special thing that Crowley did in his life?"
1)Crossing the Abyss, and 2)attaining to the K&C of the HGA.
"
what do most of the people on here think that Crowley's original and important gifts to mankind were?"The Book of the Law.
93, 93/93"
Draco,
I think I see where you are coming from, but even the concept of the HGA pre-dates Crowley.
If The Book of the Law was the most original and important gift to mankind I guess I might ask why? Gerry seems to think it was in large part because in it he predicts a war. There was another World War that happened after Crowley wrote Liber AL , but before the war of the 40's. Crowley wasn't stupid; on some level in his travels don't you think he could sense war was coming due to the tensions at the time? ?"you've lost me there
Liber Al 1904 when even the gargantuan conflict of "the Great war" was nowhere in sight. Some kind of European conflict perhaps but not such a *gargantuan war * yes we had the Kaiser/British arms race and various entente cordials but i doubt that the scale of WW1 was envisioned by anyone in 1904 ,......... okay even that was impressive to predict WW1 in 1904 BUT to make a leap to the subsequent warrior lord OF THE 40s!! c'mon now that is impressive. Furthermore crowley cites that all important religious texts contain an element of prophecy as proof of the validity of invovlement of prater human intelligence so my assertion you see was not as crass as some of you are making out.
anyway it's all intuitive and poetic ; it isn't about the empty analysis of "the dogs of reason" it's about reading between the lines and experiencing an inate (Horusian aeon?) resonance within one's subconsciousness to the various passages in Liber Al and the other Libri
back to the sub thread of what important contribution did crowley make
he caused the modern openess towards the ancient mysteries by letting the G.D. secrets out of the bag in his publishing activity. More importantly he synthesised and tried and tested comparitive religious experience making spiritual science respectable ..........no.......... he made spiritual science. Full stop. He wrote intelligently and objectively about drug use,yoga,and mysticism from first hand experience. You argue that yes he was soemwhat of a chameleon with a magpie approach to spiritual science/magick; well there's your answer. Did John Dee write about yoga? Did the catholic priests who gave mass practice objective Bhakti yoga? Did Swami Vivekananda use the Cabballa or gematria? He was a conduit and an eclectic focal point for all of man's mystical heritage up to that point whereas the people who he borrowed from were not; they were specialists they were not flexible and in my opinion controlled felxibility is the quintessence of teh 93 current
-
@Frater Pantha said
"what do most of you think was the most special thing that Crowley did in his life?"
I think Draco hit on the head the first time. Do we really need to mention anything else when one can say Crowley "Executed the Great Work"? That is just about the most special thing there is, although I suspect that if asked, he would have liked to add to that list "be a dad".
-
no it's more than that it's teh electic synthesis of all previous traditions
see my post above your one
-
Crowley brought in the New Aeon, in respect to the Old Aeon.
Which does not mean that the "New Aeon" had not come before and will not come again.
For all we know there were a million other Thelemas , and there will be millions more.
Imagine it at all, if conceivable.
-
@gerry456 said
"no it's more than that it's teh electic synthesis of all previous traditions
see my post above your one"Do you have the same sort of respect for Mathers who also created the same sort of synthesis years before Crowley?
I actually have a great deal of respect for the work that Crowley did during his life. I have however noticed that there is good number of people that seem to worship Crowley like a God. A prophet okay, but even Crowley said that he wanted to have students that used a system of attainment "more or less" like his system. It seems to me that Crowley also used a system more or less like those that came before him.
Mathers created a synthesis of traditions available to him, and Crowley seems to have continued in the foot steps of one of his teachers traditions by doing the same. IMO he created a better more advanced system during the lifetime of Mathers. I think that is really saying something, and Crowley deserves so much of the praise that he gets today because of his hard work. Do you think that if someone came up with a better or more advanced system than Crowley did that they would be accepted by the Thelemic students today? Or, would they be put down because they were different?
Are those that follow Crowley's system flexible enough to accept changes to the system itself, or has it become an inflexible dogma of religion? -
@Frater Pantha said
"
@gerry456 said
"no . Do you think that if someone came up with a better or more advanced system than Crowley did that they would be accepted by the Thelemic students today? Or, would they be put down because they were different?
Are those that follow Crowley's system flexible enough to accept changes to the system itself, or has it become an inflexible dogma of religion?"
"well yes exactyl hence teh distaste for Austin Spare and the Horus-Maat Lodge might i add on* this* site
-
@gerry456 said
"
@Frater Pantha said
"
@gerry456 said
"Do you think that if someone came up with a better or more advanced system than Crowley did that they would be accepted by the Thelemic students today? Or, would they be put down because they were different?
Are those that follow Crowley's system flexible enough to accept changes to the system itself, or has it become an inflexible dogma of religion?"well yes exactyl hence teh distaste for Austin Spare and the Horus-Maat Lodge might i add on* this* site"
"
I know that Spare was a member of the A.'.A.'. but I don't honestly understand what you mean. Are you saying that he made changes to the system and is hated for it? Or that he came up with a better, and more advanced system then Crowley?
I also do not know what Horus-Maat Lodge has done. Is this an O.T.O. Lodge? What have they done, or are they doing, that is so different? Are you part of Horus-Maat? -
well Spare thought he was modifying updating and making more efficient the "smells and bells" traditional A'A' ceremonial magick didn't he? He is seen as a A'A' drop-out. Why /How is this news to you?
if u google Horus Maat Lodge you will find their website/more info
-
@gerry456 said
"well Spare thought he was modifying updating and making more efficient the "smells and bells" traditional A'A' ceremonial magick didn't he? He is seen as a A'A' drop-out. Why /How is this news to you?"
It isn't news to me that he left the A.'.A.'. (as I did mention it in my last post), but it is news to me that he ever claimed he was making more efficient the A.'.A.'. ceremonial magick system. Where did he ever claim he was doing that?
If it was his will to work on a different system of magick after having been exposed to the A.'.A.'. system I don't see why that should make Thelemites have any distaste for him. Every human is called upon to do their true will and nothing else. If he ever did claim he was making the A.'.A.'. system more efficient the claim can be judged on its own merits. There is no need to get angry or view Spare (or his system) with distaste without exploration. If someone explores Spare's system and doesn't find any value in it they can dispose of the system and move on. Why waste any further thoughts or emotion on the issue? If the system does have value for Spare (and as it does for some other students of magick -- even some Thelemites) why put it down or view it with distaste? Not every method or ritual is going to have the same importance for every student (even within the same system). Shouldn't we all find out what works **for us **and toss out the rest? -
wheer in my post did I give u the impression that **I ** have distaste for Spare
i said others on this site have shown distaste for him
it's common sense to assume that Spare thought that he was making magick more efficient. For one he wouldn't have left the A'A'system plus he criticised it as "smells and bells " ceremony ; again this is all common knowledge if you know anything about chaos magick