Question on Liber L
-
As far as being condescending, is condescension off limits? I should think not, if it is your WILL then do it, the only reason for passing a law against condescending speech is that you think my feelings or some ones feelings need protected, I am insulted more by belief that I need protected and I need others to pull their punches, that I am by the punches themselves. Any time you restrict yourself or put a restriction in general to protect others, you are declaring that you believe some one is less than worthy or able to handle, the full brunt force of others, no holds barred. That is insulting to others. It is also protecting the weak, whom nature would have destroyed. Why should you want to help preserve the Weak whom the We are asked to stomp down and tread upon, to strike low and hard and to hell with them. Where then does the liberal-hippie morals that protect the weak and stem from a resentment of Power. It must come from then from a feeling that ones self is powerless and enslaved, and thus an empathy with the weak, the low, the base, the slave, and a resentment that orders on hatred for the noble master, the Power virtue, and the warrior caste. All of which is exactly what Thelema opposes.
-
Hi Froclown,
Can't seem to let go. You prod me on. Ox goad?
I agree that people use the concept of ethics to postpone action. (For qabalists only: Hmmm. Lamed is ox goad, is karma, is action.) And it is ridiculous avoid a decision by throwing up a concept like "Thou shalt not kill is one of the 10 commandments," when the real issue is you don't want to kill anything or are too scared to, or think you will get punished for it.
So, let's look at caste and designed function for certain people. You know, like in India -http://www.csuchico.edu/~cheinz/syllabi/asst001/spring98/india.htm.
What's wrong with this picture?
I still don't get it, Froward. How does this have to do with knowing your own True Will? Why are you defining Thelema to us? Isn't this your own view of Thelema? One part of it?
The caste system sounds as if there is no will, just biological imperatives. You know, you're a cow. You eat plants. You're a predator; you eat other living things, not plants. Can a cow choose to chase down a rabbit and gobble it down? Can an eagle decide to eat sunflower seeds?
“She rides astride the Beast; in her left hand she holds the reins, representing the passion which unites them. In her right she holds aloft the cup, the Holy Grail aflame with love and death. In this cup are mingled the elements of the sacrament of the Aeon” (Book of Thoth). In a more general sense, Babalon represents the liberated woman and the full expression of the sexual impulse. "
Does this sound like somebody from Gor?
I've read these books. I don't think so.
I understand the knowing oneself and one's purpose, and delighting in it, being content in it. Nice situation if you achieve it, or are born into it, like in Gor. But that's not HOW IT IS. How it is, is we all go stumbling blindly, doing the best we can and get hints to guide us up and down our path, shedding all the non-authentic parts of ourselves, until we are truly ourselves.
It's not that easy, Froclown. It's hard work, and damned uncomfortable at times.
Maybe now, I can abandon this thread.
Love and L.V.X.,
chrys333 -
@Froclown said
"As far as being condescending, is condescension off limits? I should think not, if it is your WILL then do it, the only reason for passing a law against condescending speech is that you think my feelings or some ones feelings need protected, I am insulted more by belief that I need protected and I need others to pull their punches, that I am by the punches themselves."
lol, you have a point but fyi i was not defending you. i was pointing out to aum418 that he's doing the same thing he's disgusted of.
@Froclown said
"Any time you restrict yourself or put a restriction in general to protect others, you are declaring that you believe some one is less than worthy or able to handle, the full brunt force of others, no holds barred. That is insulting to others. "
yes, i agree! - thelema 101
in any case, this thread has gone a little awry... or so it seems. -
93,
You've got an interesting vision, Froclown, but it seems to me your overlooking a glaring contradiction; you're arguing for a caste-based society of warriors.
Why is there so much emphasis on violence and conquest in this utopian society of yours? No caste-based society that I am aware of is made up of only a warrior caste. Is there, then, no legal system? No venue for the resolving of disputes besides brute violence?
It seems to me that in practice, such a system would result in something like what we see in Zimbabwe - rule of the strong rather than the qualified.
Sounds lovely. Cholera, anyone?
Love=Law
- C
-
Chris, I think you put the finger on exactly why a caste system would be beneficial. It is hard to discern a proper niche in which to exercise ones WILL, because their is no attempt whatsoever to discern in general what classes of WILL expression are common and create social roles that approximate these classes of WILL. Nor is their a panel of experts that analyze the character of each individual to aid them in the discipline and self-awareness necessary to discern where one fits in that system of orbits.
While it is true that each star has its own unique orbit, just as each electron has its own unique orbital shell around the atom, it is also the case than their are different type of orbits, which each electron due to its unique energy and momentum will be able to fill.
An S orbital (caste) is a simple surface of a sphere, where as a P orbital in like a dumb bell shape. Thus a caste system is preparing possible orbital shells, such that those with a Will to fill them will have some where to express that WILL. I see no harm in that, and much good. Better than our system that has no scientific means to plan society in harmony with the individuals that occur their. We have lots of pegs with no holes and holes with no pegs.
-
@Sphynx said
"
@ThatNarrowFellow said
"Why is there so much emphasis on violence and conquest in this utopian society of yours?"Why is there so much emphasis on violence and conquest in Liber AL?"
93,
I expect because it was written during the Victorian era, and during a time when Christianity and turn the other cheek were far more ubiquitous than they are today.
We should not follow the Christians' error of refusing to recognize that our holy book was written in a specific time and place. It seems like some people would like to say, "Everyone's got their own individual true Will, but it has to be violent and orgiastic." This is a mistake.
Love=Law
- C
-
Hi Froclown,
You are concerned with people who don't fit in and have no place. You think a caste system will eliminate that. I get that. It is a noble reason.
But freedom means freedom to fail, Froclown.
A caste system might be OK if it was implemented without the injustice of powerful people managing to keep their power by putting others in the wrong caste. Also, powerful people keep their own families in the best possible castes.
Ideas are great. Implementing ideas sometimes results in living nightmare situations. Look at the War on Poverty creating a welfare underclass that spanned generations.
Never know how things turn out.
Glad you gave me perspective on your desire to have us all embrace a Gor life.
In L.V.X.,
chrys333 -
"Let this formula be accepted by every government. Experts will immediately be appointed to work out, when need arises, the details of the True Will of every individual, and even that of every corporate body whether social or commercial, while a judiciary will arise to determine the equity in the case of apparently conflicting claims. (Such cases will become progressively more rare as adjustment is attained.) All appeal to precedent and authority, the deadwood of the Tree of Life, will be abolished, and strictly scientific standards will be the sole measure by which the executive power shall order the people. The absolute rule of the state shall be a function of the absolute liberty of each individual will."
If this does not imply a caste system, designed by scientific method, I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
-
Froclown 93,
A caste system, whether it is the classic Hindu arrangement or a somewhat less restrictive European class system, is not based remotely on scientific principles. It is based on an extreme form of precedent and authority.
"Your father worked on a farm with his hands - thus, you are unable to appreciate the finer things of art, and life, and spirituality, which are henceforth denied you," is not a scientific statement.
Perhaps you're taking Liber L II 57-58 : "He that is righteous shall be righteous still; he that is filthy shall be filthy still.....the kings of the earth shall be Kings forever," in this passage's narrowest sense. The total passage, though, clearly implies a spiritual perception, not a program for a kind of Thelemofascism on the mundane level of social organization. To assume it requires such a soul-crunching societal structure flies in the face of the primary theme of individual evolution outlined in the Book.
93 93/93,
EM
-
@Froclown said
""Let this formula be accepted by every government. Experts will immediately be appointed to work out, when need arises, the details of the True Will of every individual, and even that of every corporate body whether social or commercial, while a judiciary will arise to determine the equity in the case of apparently conflicting claims. (Such cases will become progressively more rare as adjustment is attained.) All appeal to precedent and authority, the deadwood of the Tree of Life, will be abolished, and strictly scientific standards will be the sole measure by which the executive power shall order the people. The absolute rule of the state shall be a function of the absolute liberty of each individual will."
If this does not imply a caste system, designed by scientific method, I have no idea what this is supposed to mean."
Then you have no clue what you are talking about.
IAO131
-
thelema implies that we all have a unique WILL and that we can not or must not act outside of those limits that are part of our natural being.
Thus we need a social system that recognizes the limits of each individual and does not attempt to push people into roles they are not suited for.
A fish's WILL is to swim in the water this it is classified in the caste of aquatic creatures, thus we know fish swim and can not fly, so we don't pressure fish out of the water, nor attempt to throw them in the air.
-
93,
Any social system that forces me to be what it presupposes I am, is about as unThelemic as it could possibly be.
93 93/93,
EM
-
So what Edward said, meant what I wished to say, but didn't.
Caste system and Thelema. Doesn't seem logical to me.
chrys333 -
allow me then to quote a few lines and paragraphs from a lesser know essay written by Crowley
Groans from the Padded Cell
(The Minority Report of the Editorial Rooms).... Today all this is absolutely changed. Every important branch of work is so specialized that a man must give his whole life to his particular job for 40 years or more before he is capable of holding his own in it. Such a man must obviously be chosen from the start on the ground of inclination and capacity. He must be allowed ample leisure. He must be secured freedom from all worries and anxiety, or he will never arrive at competence. A university education is not nearly enough. It is only a general ground-work. When a man leaves a university he wants at least 10 years uninterrupted work in his particular line before he even begins to succeed in it. In other words, the complexity of civilization demands an elaborate caste system. For one thing, the habit of authority is absolutely necessary to any one who is to fill a position of responsibility. Put a man who has done mental work all his life into an important position. He inevitably becomes a "Jack in office," harsh, overbearing, and tyrannical. On the other hand, if you take a boy and give him well trained servants, he will, when he becomes a man, get things done with perfect suavity and good feeling and absence of fiction.1 This is why you can take a boy from Eton or Winchester and send him out to rule a province in India. The "Competition-wallah," the boy of no birth or breeding who obtains a position in the Indian Civil Service by intellectual merit, is a disastrous failure.
There must, however, be an end to all this talk of equality of opportunity. It will always be necessary to have a great majority of the population engaged in mechanical tasks. It is evidently quite impossible to give every man and woman even a university education. Most people have to earn their living by the time they are sixteen. Even if this experiment were possible, it would be absurd, because the university education would unfit the average individual for the necessary work of life. It is no good to teach a man political economy and Greek, and then set him to make rivets in a boiler factory for the rest of his life. ........ Now undoubtedly much mischief is wrought by having a caste which is hereditary and nothing more, because the said degenerates and imbeciles interfere with the working of the social machine. Our business is to get the right man in the right place; and the hard and fast rule of primogeniture has in many cases worked badly. One may concede that ultimately it is bound to work badly is all cases. ....
... What then is the ideal form of government? The greatest of all the political lessons of history is that society is founded on the family, and the family on the land. A strong agrarian class is the best defense against invasion, physical or moral. "A bold peasantry, its country's pride, when once destroyed, can never be supplied." There is something in the contact with earth and air and water and sun which makes men vigorous. All strong and stable states have had Cincinnatus for a unit. The power of England has always lain in the landed nobility and gentry. Each great estate has been the nucleus of a peasantry with "soul" -- with a peculiar pride in itself. The lords of the land, great or little, were also the fathers of the people. Each took a particular and individual interest in each of his tenants....
... And it is the soul which determines the action of a true man. A nation swayed wholly by economic considerations is a nation lost alike to God and to man. "Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey, When wealth accumulates and men decay."
The first business of government is to guard the hardihood of the race. So we must see to it that every child is healthy and well-fed, inured to sport, to hardship within certain bounds. The spirit must be free, the passions strong and well regulated, the intellect unhampered by old wives' fables. We must assure to every one the first necessaries of life, shelter, food, warmth, and the easy exercise of the power of reproduction, without shame or sentimentality.
We must make a firm, almost a paternal bond, between the "lord" and his dependents. If an employer were soundly whipped whenever one of his men or women had a preventable sickness, it would change things considerably! The happiest, the most healthy, the most prosperous class in recent history were the slaves in the South before the Civil War, wherever the owner was a decent Southern Gentleman, and not a Yankee nigger-driver with no interest in the slaves beyond dollars. If America is to survive, nay, to become a nation, it must be by the development of an enlightened feudalism....Let me repeat that last line, it must be by the development of an enlightened
feudalism"Look up the whole essay and compare this with the Feudal system that is the basis of Gorean city structure, and you see where I am coming from.
Also contrast These very clear views, with the this modern liberal misrepresentation of Thelema. -
Froclown, 93,
I think you misunderstand what Crowley meant by an *enlightened *feudalism. Also, a 'strong agrarian class' might have prevailed in his day, but no modern society has one.
But finally, while I respect Crowley for having tried to describe a society in which we all would prosper, I have never been convinced by his sociological and political theories. I think he is often at his weakest in these areas - certainly he is much less incisive in them than he is on mystical topics.
I'll stick with my 'liberal' ideas.
Over and out on this one,
93 93/93,
EM
-
@Froclown said
"...because their is no attempt whatsoever to discern in general what classes of WILL expression are common and create social roles that approximate these classes of WILL. Nor is their a panel of experts that analyze the character of each individual to aid them in the discipline and self-awareness necessary to discern where one fits in that system of orbits.
...Thus a caste system is preparing possible orbital shells, such that those with a Will to fill them will have some where to express that WILL. I see no harm in that, and much good. Better than our system that has no scientific means to plan society in harmony with the individuals that occur their.
Experts will immediately be appointed to work out, when need arises, the details of the True Will of every individual, ... strictly scientific standards will be the sole measure by which the executive power shall order the people. "
Yet, you yourself acknowledged in another thread that:
@Froclown said"Scientific illuminism teaches that the rational mind alone is not able to grasp ones TRUE WILL"
I responded by further noting that the rational mind alone is not able to grasp the true will of a particular society either. I would have thought it also goes without saying that one individual is not able to grasp ANOTHER individual's true will, whether "strictly scientific standards" are used or not. This being the case, I cannot believe any panel of experts would have any actual authority to determine where I belong based on their assessment of my true will: because such an assessment can only be made by ONE person, me.
@Froclown said
"Thus we need a social system that recognizes the limits of each individual and does not attempt to push people into roles they are not suited for. "
I have a radical proclamation: such a system is already in place! And even better, it hasn't been designed by humans. It's called existence. It is necessarily a "social system" since existence is characterized by relationships, and it completely recognizes the limits of each individual, and it never attempts to push people into roles they are not suited for. Note your fish example as a perfect illustration of this.
-
@Sphynx said
"Why is there so much emphasis on violence and conquest in Liber AL?"
@ThatNarrowFellow said
"I expect because it was written during the Victorian era ..."
Oh? Check out today's news (Iraq, Afgan, Assorted African Nations, Korea, etc, etc) - Not much has changed. No agreement - human nature was and is aggressive and it turns violent whenever it thinks it can get away with it.
@ThatNarrowFellow said
"It seems like some people would like to say, "Everyone's got their own individual true Will, but it has to be violent and orgiastic." This is a mistake. "
Agreement on this. There are obviously people whose "Will" is pacific and gentle. Even if human nature (like most animals) tends to be violent, it is often best to avoid such nonsense (if possible). -
let me refine what I meant
The rational mind unaided by objective records of ones expressed behaviors and the results of those behaviors, is not sufficient to discern what its own best interest might be, let alone what actions are in it's won best interest. One does no innately know thyself, one must mavke a study of onself on scientfic means, which includes calling upon unbiased third parites to help interpret data in a bind so better a double blind assesment sf the data.
The True WILL can then realized once all of the bits of datum, are incorperated and assemelated holistically by the unconscious transrational faculty, ie a samadhi and satori upon the conscious data, which unites and infuses that unbiased information into the personal identity and personality.
To put this another way, one creates knowledge of and enters into communication with the holy gaurdian angel. That being ones most objective self that generally only reveals inself with subjective ego bias and distoritions of the conscious mind, cleared of these distortions by objective accounting of ones behavior.
-
I'd like to comment briefly on something as it harkens back to something I said way earlier in this thread. Froclown wrote that a fish's true will is to swim. Now if this if his interpretation of True Will, then I can understand why he writes what he writes. But, a fish's True Will is not to swim. You have taken out that one must discover their True Will. I doubt fish can do this. Let alone have a C & K of the HGA to guide or enlighten them to their True Will. So it seems this process was taken out of Froclown's writings, as if True Will was already conscious for everyone. Froclown also leaves out people who think they know their True Will but do not. These later two actions would account for most of the decisions in Froclown's writings, and I'm sure, the world of Gor as well.