Trasncultural landmarks
-
@Patrick Ossoski said
"
@Q789 said
"KCHGA is the Western version of the Buddist 'Enlightenment'."That varies, I think. Might just as well be the crossing of the Abyss. I'm no Buddhist expert, though.
"As someone who has spent quite some time in both worlds, as it were, I would say that there is a huge amount of "buddhism" and "hinduism" out there. Saying a single thing about it and trying to say "that's buddhism" is like finding something that is agreed upon by all branches of Christianity, living and extinct, exoteric plus esoteric. There are probably a few, but not much. Ditto for Hinduism.
There are branches of both that are as dogmatic as Catholicism, or as stunted as the basest of evangelical churches, and there are branches of both that are profound mystery schools. And, just like with western religion, the most "mainstream" versions of both faiths are the least useful.What I can tell you from my own experience is that its clear to me that there is a "Sanatana Dharma" (or Philosophia Perennis, if you prefer), a single formula of underlying Truth that is not what "all religions believe" or nonsense like that, but it IS a formula that can be found in almost any culture, in the esoteric systems hidden in that culture.
I can also tell you from my own experience that part of this formula involves three stages (degrees, if you like, with non-initiate/profane/cowan/whatever being the fourth stage); these stages could be summed up as "Initiate, Adept, Master". And of course its quite possible to break them down into further sections.
Because of the aforementioned variety of belief systems found in Buddhism and Hinduism, you can certainly find individual sets of systems that do not correlate correctly, but from my own experiences and exploration of Truth, I could tell you that what is generally termed Enlightenment begins at crossing the abyss.
93!
-
@Q789 said
"In terms of the abyss, similarities are found in the works of AC, Hindi art etc etc."
@Swamiji said
"Because of the aforementioned variety of belief systems found in Buddhism and Hinduism, you can certainly find individual sets of systems that do not correlate correctly, but from my own experiences and exploration of Truth, I could tell you that what is generally termed Enlightenment begins at crossing the abyss.
"I thougt "the abyss" for Thelemites was just the great gulf or void between the phenomenal world of manifestation and its noumenal source?
Some Buddhists (the ones more influenced by western-philosophical-matertialism--and especially the ones influenced by it but who don't want to admit it) want to deny the noumenal because it's "metaphysical speculation." Others are willing to look at it because of the Buddha's (and many of his followers) claims to attainment of the first five abhiññā (source).
(1) magical powers (iddhi-vidha),
(2) divine ear (dibba-sota),
(3) penetration of the minds of others (ceto-pariya-ñāna),
(4) remembrance of former existences (pubbe-nivāsānussati),
(5) divine eye (dibba-cakkhu),
The sixth is
(6) extinction of all cankers (āsavakkhaya).
Which is a synonym for nibbana, which, IMO, also involves noumenal and phenomenal processess.
Most Buddhists however, to my dismay, don't want to admit that these things and Magick have anything in common. Okay, so Crowley was critical of many Buddhist ideas, but he consistently acknowledged the Buddha as a Magus (or was it Ipsissimus?)--somone who etablishes his own Law.
-
@Swamiji said
"I can also tell you from my own experience that part of this formula involves three stages (degrees, if you like, with non-initiate/profane/cowan/whatever being the fourth stage); these stages could be summed up as "Initiate, Adept, Master". And of course its quite possible to break them down into further sections.
Because of the aforementioned variety of belief systems found in Buddhism and Hinduism, you can certainly find individual sets of systems that do not correlate correctly, but from my own experiences and exploration of Truth, I could tell you that what is generally termed Enlightenment begins at crossing the abyss. "
I thought so. Thank you.
-
"I can also tell you from my own experience that part of this formula involves three stages (degrees, if you like, with non-initiate/profane/cowan/whatever being the fourth stage); these stages could be summed up as "Initiate, Adept, Master". And of course its quite possible to break them down into further sections.
Because of the aforementioned variety of belief systems found in Buddhism and Hinduism, you can certainly find individual sets of systems that do not correlate correctly, but from my own experiences and exploration of Truth, I could tell you that what is generally termed Enlightenment begins at crossing the abyss.
93!"
yes.
-
@Horus Amin said
"
@landis said
"
Most Buddhists however, to my dismay, don't want to admit that these things and Magick have anything in common. "How do they interpret it then? How does it have nothing in common for them?"
I googled Magick and Buddhism and this is the most heated link I found:
-
@Horus Amin said
"
@landis said
"
Most Buddhists however, to my dismay, don't want to admit that these things and Magick have anything in common. "How do they interpret it then? How does it have nothing in common for them?"
Yep you are sure right about that.
IMPO- I have witnessed many people actually treating Buddism as a religion. They are clearly not doing the work and have no chance at all(IMHO).
One thing I will say about Western Occultism is that you will actually find people who are truley focused, who are prepared to work hard, who actually study, actually practice, and who actually achieve KCHGA (or whatever words you give it).
In short the Buddists I have met a pussys
-
@Q789 said
"
@Horus Amin said
"
@landis said
"
Most Buddhists however, to my dismay, don't want to admit that these things and Magick have anything in common. "How do they interpret it then? How does it have nothing in common for them?"
Yep you are sure right about that.
IMPO- I have witnessed many people actually treating Buddism as a religion. They are clearly not doing the work and have no chance at all(IMHO).
One thing I will say about Western Occultism is that you will actually find people who are truley focused, who are prepared to work hard, who actually study, actually practice, and who actually achieve KCHGA (or whatever words you give it).
In short the Buddists I have met a pussys"
That depends on what you mean by "religion." I've met some Buddists who are extremely focused, practice very hard, study a lot, etc... (BTW, I know what HGA stands for, but what does the KC stand for?
). And the monastics I've met and/or study are extraordinarily hardcore.OTH, I've met some Buddhists, who, as you say, are "pussies," but I think that's more of a cultural issue than a merely Buddhist one. Many people are attracted to Buddhism becuase they have pie-in-the-sky preconceptions about it being a tradition of peace, tranquility and harmony and imagne the Buddha as some kind of bleeding-heart, politically correct liberal. It's much more complex than that.
-
@chris S said
"The Theravadin Buddhists are very political, er.. thats all i'll say
"@chris S said
"
No doubt you're already aware of this and its the main reason i avoided it as well, is arguing for doctrine. It's a complete political process that Buddha offered a warning on.."I know that's all you wanted to say, but would you mind elaborating some? Do you mean political amongst themselves, or involved with modern political philosophies (liberalism, libertarianism, communitarianism, etc...), or both?
-
@landis said
"
@chris S said
"The Theravadin Buddhists are very political, er.. thats all i'll say"@chris S said
"
No doubt you're already aware of this and its the main reason i avoided it as well, is arguing for doctrine. It's a complete political process that Buddha offered a warning on.."I know that's all you wanted to say, but would you mind elaborating some? Do you mean political amongst themselves, or involved with modern political philosophies (liberalism, libertarianism, communitarianism, etc...), or both?"
well.. what i was more pointing at was their general avoidance of entering a dialogue with the western magical tradition.
Theravada Buddhism would have to be the oldest form of Buddhism and its quite conservative, imo the establishment of 'right' canon was established by rulers/kings. (man you'll get into heated arguments with this stuff).. So you see i just avoid it.
There were entrances of Mahayana esoteric Buddhism, though rulers ensured that Theravada remained traditional.. so you'll see that contrast with other forms of Buddhism, regardless that a close study include a number of positions that agree with Mahayana teachings.
Basically..Theravada Buddhists consider much of what is found in Mahayana scriptural collections to be not authentic words of the Buddha.
They have always been that way, though took an even stronger stance after incursions by western colonialism and Christianity.
Of course this just generally as a body, individuals may outwardly hold to doctrine close, though do their own thing personally.