"Kill/Fill" - not "Kill Bill"
-
@Jason R said
"
@Alrah said
"
And wold you like to give me your considered opinion about the work of the men on Lashtal? Is that convoluted in your opinion?{@ other readers... I'm used to being granted less respect for my work because I'm a woman. People find it easier to criticize the work of women whereas they hesitate when it's a man. This is just a fact of life, but I get rather sick of it, as you might imagine...]"
I never go on Lashtal, and I would say the same thing. I felt it was a bit of a stretch.
I was raised by my mother. I have NO bias against women. I cant FATHOM how you even came up with this idea based upon my comment. I was just giving you my honest opinion.
P.S. I can't remember any time that anyone on here has attacked you because you were a woman. I think THAT is a stretch too."
Being raised by your mother does not mean you are not unconsciously biased by cultural conditioning. It is pervasive in society for men to accord women with less respect than they would do with other men. It's probably something to do with animal dominance behavior. I suggest that you read this article in Science Daily -
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/07/060714174545.htm
The same happens in the occult community too, though your ego cannot accept it. And now -if you have nothing more to add than the fact that a section of my work seems convoluted to you (in comparison to what?) then perhaps we can get back to the thread.
-
Notes about the number 231:
- The sum of the first 22 numbers, 0 to 21; the sum of the Key-Numbers of the Tarot cards.
231 - the mystic number of Jupiter (Kaph).
231 mystical Gates of the Sefer Yetzirah.
[Added]
And I love this new finding...
As you may know - the Lost Word BaraHdd = 217. Also 31 (AL) x 7 = 217. Also the number of the Inner Temple = 217.21700 / 231 = 93.939393939393939393 - into infinity!
-
"Being raised by your mother does not mean you are not unconsciously biased by cultural conditioning. It is pervasive in society for men to accord women with less respect than they would do with other men. It's probably something to do with animal dominance behavior. I suggest that you read this article in Science Daily -
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 174545.htm
The same happens in the occult community too, though your ego cannot accept it. And now -if you have nothing more to add than the fact that a section of my work seems convoluted to you (in comparison to what?) then perhaps we can get back to the thread."
I'm not going to just sit here an allow you to call me sexist simply because I disagreed with you. What real reason do you have to make such a suggestion??
This is unbelievable.
My reasons were simple for suggesting your ideas were a stretch, NONE of which had anything to do with your gender. Your projecting here, and obviously have issues.
-
@Jason R said
"
"Being raised by your mother does not mean you are not unconsciously biased by cultural conditioning. It is pervasive in society for men to accord women with less respect than they would do with other men. It's probably something to do with animal dominance behavior. I suggest that you read this article in Science Daily -www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 174545.htm
The same happens in the occult community too, though your ego cannot accept it. And now -if you have nothing more to add than the fact that a section of my work seems convoluted to you (in comparison to what?) then perhaps we can get back to the thread."
I'm not going to just sit here an allow you to call me sexist simply because I disagreed with you. What real reason do you have to make such a suggestion??
This is unbelievable.
My reasons were simple for suggesting your ideas were a stretch, NONE of which had anything to do with your gender. Your projecting here, and obviously have issues."
You have issues when I say your sh1t stinks. Fvck off Jason, and don't come back. You don't have the intelligence nor the scholarship to critic my work so let's not pretend you were doing anything else that choosing a female to criticize to shore up your weak opinion of yourself. It's transparent and boring. Infact - I bet you haven't even had the balls to sign the petition yet, have you?
-
@Alrah said
"
@Jason R said
"
"Being raised by your mother does not mean you are not unconsciously biased by cultural conditioning. It is pervasive in society for men to accord women with less respect than they would do with other men. It's probably something to do with animal dominance behavior. I suggest that you read this article in Science Daily -www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 174545.htm
The same happens in the occult community too, though your ego cannot accept it. And now -if you have nothing more to add than the fact that a section of my work seems convoluted to you (in comparison to what?) then perhaps we can get back to the thread."
I'm not going to just sit here an allow you to call me sexist simply because I disagreed with you. What real reason do you have to make such a suggestion??
This is unbelievable.
My reasons were simple for suggesting your ideas were a stretch, NONE of which had anything to do with your gender. Your projecting here, and obviously have issues."
You have issues when I say your sh1t stinks. {â¢â¢â¢â¢} off Jason, and don't come back. You don't have the intelligence nor the scholarship to critic my work so let's not pretend you were doing anything else that choosing a female to criticize to shore up your weak opinion of yourself. It's transparent and boring. Infact - I bet you haven't even had the balls to sign the petition yet, have you?"
Alrah, there's an old saying we used to have in my college courses in psychology. If one person calls you an ass, it's okay to ignore them if you want, but if three people call you an ass, you might want to turn around and look to see if you have a tail.
This so-called "sexist" projection issue has been called to your attention as long as I've known yu here. You've called me a sexist without warrant, you've called other sexist without warrant. Your qabalah is a stretch, it really is, if you add this concept of "counting the numbers as words" thing, that's a stretch I've never heard of before.
Don't take it personal. It's been mentioned before and concerning other topics, gematria is always about stretching. That's just what gematria is. No one has said you, or females, or anything personal - but "that" concept is a stretch.
-
@Alrah said
"
@Jason R said
"
"Being raised by your mother does not mean you are not unconsciously biased by cultural conditioning. It is pervasive in society for men to accord women with less respect than they would do with other men. It's probably something to do with animal dominance behavior. I suggest that you read this article in Science Daily -www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 174545.htm
The same happens in the occult community too, though your ego cannot accept it. And now -if you have nothing more to add than the fact that a section of my work seems convoluted to you (in comparison to what?) then perhaps we can get back to the thread."
I'm not going to just sit here an allow you to call me sexist simply because I disagreed with you. What real reason do you have to make such a suggestion??
This is unbelievable.
My reasons were simple for suggesting your ideas were a stretch, NONE of which had anything to do with your gender. Your projecting here, and obviously have issues."
You have issues when I say your sh1t stinks. {â¢â¢â¢â¢} off Jason, and don't come back. You don't have the intelligence nor the scholarship to critic my work so let's not pretend you were doing anything else that choosing a female to criticize to shore up your weak opinion of yourself. It's transparent and boring. Infact - I bet you haven't even had the balls to sign the petition yet, have you?"
Wow you SERIOUSLY have issues Alrah. Honestly. In fact I was one of the first to sign.
Is this the words of an enlightened person? Is this the argument and actions of a scholar? I may not be a scholar but I know BS when I see it, and someone with issues. Your insistence on this sexism issue for absolutely NO reason is evidence of your own issue with it, not mine.
Show me where I have ever argued or "singled out" a female on here. Your crazy.
Jim, is this appropriate for her to suggest here that I am being sexist??? I don't think this is fair for her to be allowed to accuse me of this. I see no reason for this sort of attack at all.
-
OK, everyone... the attacks are getting personal. Roll it back, please.
-
@Takamba said
"
Alrah, there's an old saying we used to have in my college courses in psychology. If one person calls you an {}, it's okay to ignore them if you want, but if three people call you an {}, you might want to turn around and look to see if you have a tail.This so-called "sexist" projection issue has been called to your attention as long as I've known yu here. You've called me a sexist without warrant, you've called other sexist without warrant. Your qabalah is a stretch, it really is, if you add this concept of "counting the numbers as words" thing, that's a stretch I've never heard of before.
Don't take it personal. It's been mentioned before and concerning other topics, gematria is always about stretching. That's just what gematria is. No one has said you, or females, or anything personal - but "that" concept is a stretch."
The only people my Qabalah is a stretch to is idiots that have not studied enough to be my peers and think they can take a cheap shot because I'm a woman.
Those who are already attained (with books behind them, degree's and professors) say my work is highly interesting and compelling, so when I take shit from men with low self esteem who try to lord it over women on a public forum (like you do all the time stroking your d1ck while advising Veronica) then I take that as it is - pure crap to ignore, disdain and not take seriously when it comes from the little league.
Prove yourself and go critic the guys while you're t it on Lashtal - or stay here and be a yellow bellied opportunist and try your animal dominance with me. Your sh1t stinks too, T.
You've never heard of the techniques of the German Hasidim that counted the letters? Or the Lurianic Qabalsists. You know fvck all about the Merkabah mystics. Go learn and then I might treat you seriously.
-
@Jim Eshelman said
"OK, everyone... the attacks are getting personal. Roll it back, please."
I'm a woman so when they engage in their act's of culturally conditioned sexism and try and say I'm wrong for objecting... then don't you blame me for getting rightly annoyed with their sh1t Jim. When they stink - I'll call them on it, for their own good as well as mine. 93!
-
"If you remove the 154 verse numbers as words, and count the circle squared character as a word there are 5867 words in Liber AL. If we add the 13 words from the pencil notation (doesn't that begin with ink?) at III,37 "I am the Lord of Thebes from Vellum book Unity to fill me" = 5880 words."
I need only bring up ONE idea here that is a STRETCH.
- "Count the circle squared as a word"
Ok. So what scholarly intelligent, perfectly clear reason do you have to do this? What reason do you have to totally ignore the line drawn on the same page that is ALSO a "key"? If your going to start counting drawn characters as words, why not the line? That ALONE is a stretch! Not to mention your counting only certain verse numbers etc. It all makes zero sense. If this is the big bad intelligence of a scholar then I'm disappointed.
-
I'm going to presume the last set of posts were made without noticing my prior post. So, before issuing warnings to individuals, I'm going to repost this:
OK, everyone... the attacks are getting personal. Roll it back, please.
Thank you.
-
@Alrah said
"
@Jim Eshelman said
"OK, everyone... the attacks are getting personal. Roll it back, please."I'm a woman so when they engage in their act's of culturally conditioned sexism and try and say I'm wrong for objecting... then don't you blame me for getting rightly annoyed with their sh1t Jim. When they stink - I'll call them on it, for their own good as well as mine. 93!"
So let me get this straight. Your SO intelligent, that you believe it's logical to assume that if anyone happens to disagree with you they are picking on you because your a female? Great logic there at work. You sure do make me feel inferior.
Jim, this type of crap is very inappropriate and hostile. I for one do not feel comfortable coming here and simply giving my opinion, and being called sexist. That isn't right.
-
@Jason R said
"
@Alrah said
"
@Jason R said
"
I'm not going to just sit here an allow you to call me sexist simply because I disagreed with you. What real reason do you have to make such a suggestion??This is unbelievable.
My reasons were simple for suggesting your ideas were a stretch, NONE of which had anything to do with your gender. Your projecting here, and obviously have issues."
You have issues when I say your sh1t stinks. {â¢â¢â¢â¢} off Jason, and don't come back. You don't have the intelligence nor the scholarship to critic my work so let's not pretend you were doing anything else that choosing a female to criticize to shore up your weak opinion of yourself. It's transparent and boring. Infact - I bet you haven't even had the balls to sign the petition yet, have you?"
Wow you SERIOUSLY have issues Alrah. Honestly. In fact I was one of the first to sign.
Is this the words of an enlightened person? Is this the argument and actions of a scholar? I may not be a scholar but I know BS when I see it, and someone with issues. Your insistence on this sexism issue for absolutely NO reason is evidence of your own issue with it, not mine.
Show me where I have ever argued or "singled out" a female on here. Your crazy.
Jim, is this appropriate for her to suggest here that I am being sexist??? I don't think this is fair for her to be allowed to accuse me of this. I see no reason for this sort of attack at all."
Don't you dare start bleating to Jim about your fvcking rights after you blithely walk over mine and dismiss my work without an explanation. Just because you have a fvcking dick does not make you a higher status individual who ought to be respected more than me.
I solved II, 76, and revealed about half of the cryptography of Liber Al to the world while you are stick d1cking around with number games and English Qabalah illusions. You haven't earned the right by your scholarship to take the attitude to my work - completely dismissive of one section of it without even crediting the very real discoveries I have made over the months while cracking Liber AL or the recent work. All you wanted was to vampirically take a piece. Well fvck you!
You should shut your mouth already.
-
@Jason R said
"
"If you remove the 154 verse numbers as words, and count the circle squared character as a word there are 5867 words in Liber AL. If we add the 13 words from the pencil notation (doesn't that begin with ink?) at III,37 "I am the Lord of Thebes from Vellum book Unity to fill me" = 5880 words."I need only bring up ONE idea here that is a STRETCH.
- "Count the circle squared as a word"
Ok. So what scholarly intelligent, perfectly clear reason do you have to do this? What reason do you have to totally ignore the line drawn on the same page that is ALSO a "key"? If your going to start counting drawn characters as words, why not the line? That ALONE is a stretch! Not to mention your counting only certain verse numbers etc. It all makes zero sense. If this is the big bad intelligence of a scholar then I'm disappointed."
Yeah - well a MAN did that over on Lashtal and everyone played kittens so I suggest you join them.
-
@Jim Eshelman said
"I'm going to presume the last set of posts were made without noticing my prior post. So, before issuing warnings to individuals, I'm going to repost this:
OK, everyone... the attacks are getting personal. Roll it back, please.
Thank you."
You are being incredibly kind to Alrah as she clearly quoted your warning.
-
"Don't you dare start bleating to Jim about your {â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢} rights after you blithely walk over mine and dismiss my work without an explanation. Just because you have a {â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢} dick does not make you a higher status individual who ought to be respected more than me.
I solved II, 76, and revealed about half of the cryptography of Liber Al to the world while you are stick d1cking around with number games and English Qabalah illusions. You haven't earned the right by your scholarship to take the attitude to my work - completely dismissive of one section of it without even crediting the very real discoveries I have made over the months while cracking Liber AL or the recent work. All you wanted was to vampirically take a piece. Well {â¢â¢â¢â¢} you!
You should shut your mouth already."
HA!
Is the above some higher form of scholarly humor that somehow is over my head? I don't get it.
I don't need any "scholarship" to see how weak your ideas are. My point was that I CAN take, and only need to take, ONE of your ideas out of the whole thing to prove my point. It's a stretch!
JUST that one point is enough to justify calling it convoluted!
-
@Takamba said
"
@Jim Eshelman said
"I'm going to presume the last set of posts were made without noticing my prior post. So, before issuing warnings to individuals, I'm going to repost this:OK, everyone... the attacks are getting personal. Roll it back, please.
Thank you."
You are being incredibly kind to Alrah as she clearly quoted your warning."
And you think he doesn't see you now with that comment?
-
@Jason R said
"
"Don't you dare start bleating to Jim about your {â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢} rights after you blithely walk over mine and dismiss my work without an explanation. Just because you have a {â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢â¢} dick does not make you a higher status individual who ought to be respected more than me.I solved II, 76, and revealed about half of the cryptography of Liber Al to the world while you are stick d1cking around with number games and English Qabalah illusions. You haven't earned the right by your scholarship to take the attitude to my work - completely dismissive of one section of it without even crediting the very real discoveries I have made over the months while cracking Liber AL or the recent work. All you wanted was to vampirically take a piece. Well {â¢â¢â¢â¢} you!
You should shut your mouth already."
HA!
Is the above some higher form of scholarly humor that somehow is over my head? I don't get it.
I don't need any "scholarship" to see how weak your ideas are. My point was that I CAN take, and only need to take, ONE of your ideas out of the whole thing to prove my point. It's a stretch!
JUST that one point is enough to justify calling it convoluted!"
And your argument to justify your opinion is?
Show me where you have made a comparison? (I suggested the guys on Lashtal at the moment since we're working the same work here, but you didn't see to have the balls for that... did you?)
Offered evidence?
No - you just relied on the fact you have respect from others more than I do because of that sausage between your legs.
Weak.... very weak of you.
-
"And your argument to justify your opinion is?
Show me where you have made a comparison? (I suggested the guys on Lashtal at the moment since we're working the same work here, but you didn't see to have the balls for that... did you?)
Offered evidence?
No - you just relied on the fact you have respect from others more than I do because of that sausage between your legs.
Weak.... very weak of you."
Please.
Guess what, we are not ON Lashtal are we? We are HERE, and you brought up YOUR idea HERE. I gave you my opinion HERE. I thought this was YOUR idea, or are you now suggesting it is someone else's? What, do you need them to argue for you or something? Can't you argue your theory?
I have GREAT respect for others, and have always shown respect, unless someone has disrespected me first. So get your facts straight! Your the one obsessed with sausages.
The ONLY thing weak is you counting verse numbers as words, and circles drawn on a page as a word. Period. Dumb idea, without any sort of evidence to back it up. Can you quote ANY verse that would suggest counting the circle squared character as a word? How about ignoring then the line drawn character? THAT alone shows how weak an idea it is.
-
@Jason R said
"
"And your argument to justify your opinion is?Show me where you have made a comparison? (I suggested the guys on Lashtal at the moment since we're working the same work here, but you didn't see to have the balls for that... did you?)
Offered evidence?
No - you just relied on the fact you have respect from others more than I do because of that sausage between your legs.
Weak.... very weak of you."
Please.
Guess what, we are not ON Lashtal are we? We are HERE, and you brought up YOUR idea HERE. I gave you my opinion HERE. I thought this was YOUR idea, or are you now suggesting it is someone else's? What, do you need them to argue for you or something? Can't you argue your theory?
I have GREAT respect for others, and have always shown respect, unless someone has disrespected me first. So get your facts straight! Your the one obsessed with sausages.
The ONLY thing weak is you counting verse numbers as words, and circles drawn on a page as a word. Period. Dumb idea, without any sort of evidence to back it up. Can you quote ANY verse that would suggest counting the circle squared character as a word? How about ignoring then the line drawn character? THAT alone shows how weak an idea it is."
Since what I did is* extract* the verse numbers as words and since the circle squared by Crowley is symbolic of a 'word', then it just shows how lacking in scholarship your comments and critic really are.
John Griffiths also includes the circled squared in his calculations so you are calling him 'dumb' as well. ***slow cap for a slow individual ***