The Star Sapphire - notes
-
Oh, i have done my fair share of that kind of Magick too.
Mainly in the 90:s and of an autoerotic natrure (Hieros gamos with telesmatic partner and so on).My fiancé is not trained in Magick or Yoga so wont risk it
and Pittsburgh is far away.
-
Hi, I’m really trying to understand the N.O.X. signs and the Mark of the Beast derived from it. The main reference points for these are Liber 333 (The Book of Lies) chapter 0, 1, 69; Rituals Star Ruby, Star Sapphire, Liber V.
From Liber 333 chapter 1 I got IO PAN 2=0 and N.O.X. 0=2 – The Night of Pan (The 2 of 0). Both PAN A and N.O.X. O are the same because A=Aleph=0. The Mark of the Beast would be X, then 0, joined they would give N – Death – 2=0 IO PAN.
From Liber 333 chapter 69, 69 is Xi(60)+Theta(9) – the paths 25 and 19 that give ON+TO MEGA THERION etc. etc. ST=1, the Point; S=2, the Cross; T=0, the Circle, The Great Work – 210, the same formula 2=0 – see 777 Revised, Table XLIX, LIII.
And then Jim says about the Mark of the Beast - do 0 and X, he means 0=2 formula, which contradicts with Liber 333 chapter 69, 2=0 formula. Why?Now Liber 333 chap. 0, note I says “Silence. Nuit, O; Hadit; Ra-Hoor-Khuit, I.”.
Kteis – Nuit, “O”; Phallus- Ra-Hoor-Khuit, “!” without the dot; Sperma – Hadit, “.” the dot. It is the formula N.O.X, 0=2 - “Silence” being “Babalon” – the secret name of Nuit. According to Liber V divine names the signs are - MT, Mulier, Puella, Vir, Puer (Ra-Hoor-Khuit representing Therion – Vir and Babalon – Mulier). They don’t contradict with the A.:A.: grade signs that are Puer, Vir, Puella, Mulier, MT - which show the formula 2=0 and are X.O.N.=IO PAN=The Mark of the Beast signs.Now I wonder when you vibrate IO PAN in Star Ruby that means 2=0 but you do the N.O.X. 0=2 signs – why contradict oneself? Is the contradiction necessary in the Ritual?
I understand that Crowley was the Messenger that is = in the 2=0 formula, but the Great Work is self annihilation – 0. Now the 0=2 formula shows the descending light N.O.X. down the Tree into the Universe. So could this mean that while vibrating IO PAN we ask the Light N.O.X. to show us the way to self annihilation? Or should it be done with the signs X.O.N.=IO PAN that they both correspond to 2=0, as is the common practice in Star Sapphire? Liber V clearly is a ritual trap with the “strange” N.O.X. sign layout but why a lot of people do the N.O.X. signs almost the same as in that particular ritual i.e. O.X.N, =20 Puella, Puer, Vir, Mulier, MT?Of course, 20 is ATU The Aeon and it shows the Mark of the Beast Jim does as O and X. So as I see the sigil derived from the Liber V ritual! Kenneth Grant in his book “The Hidden God” chapter 10 shows the sigil of the Mark of the Beast also but it is not said which sign comes first – the Phallus or the Kteis? As I see the first is given the Apophis sign, the Phallus and the second is the Mulier sign, the Kteis so I believe I am correct assuming that the X goes first and then the O. Btw at the beginning of the ritual the X is mentioned as the Magick Rood and the Mystic Rose as O in the same order as I assume the signs should be made. The IO PAN formula also shows the I, the Phallus first and then the O, the Kteis second.
How to draw the Mark of the Beast sign i.e. the X and the 0? Should one start from the left “I” going down and then do the right “I” going down; should the “0” be drawn from the left like in the GD papers about drawing figures or from the right – going up or down? I would be grateful for clearing things up.
I would like to thank the people who posted valuable information regarding the Rituals. Cheers!
-
Personally I would draw X in this manner: the first I would be from high left to low right, the second from high right to low left symbolizing the Pater and Filius and Mater and Filia and then the O from the left upwards showing the IHVH formula.
So what do you think people? Am I making sense? -
The general practice rule - unless there is a distinctive reason to do otherwise - is "top to bottom, left to right."
I would definitely draw the circle first, then the X. My own practice is to draw the circle clockwise from the top, then the first X stroke is top left point to lower right point, followed by the top right to lower left.
However, from the point of this particular ritual, I'm not interested in overly locking it down. I'm not sure it makes a big difference - possibly no magical difference at all.
-
You wrote that you derive the Mark of The Beast sign from the letters N.O.X. and then you say that you do O and then X. That makes O.X.N. Or you just drop N? Why? Btw why repeat the 'N.O.X.= The Mark' sign if you done it in the begining? Could it be that the Mark sign is the sigil of Jupiter?
Jim could you give your impresions on this ritual or are they exacly the same as the Adept's you quote?
Could you elaborate more on why you chose the sign Apophis for Set Triumphant and not Set Fighting or Puella etc? -
In I.R. Complete GD System of Magic - The Ritual of The Rose Cross a diagram is shown how to make the Rosy (Rose) Cross. It is |, then - and then O begining from the bottom right. That way the 'N.O.X.-The Mark' sign isn't used twice. And the 3 ARARITA's vibrated while forming it. Aurum Solis use this sign in their Wards of Adamant ritual but form it like: -, |, O from the top, vibrating three names.
Am I making sense? -
Jim you state that The Star Sapphire and The Star Ruby, the N.O.X. are of use then one is 5=6. As I understand it is your opinion but not C.O.T/T.O.T.? The thing is that in Liber ABA pt. 3 the Star Ruby is listed as A.:A.: Probationer and Star Sapphire as Zelator work. I don't understand does the A.:A.: have anything to do with C.O.T./T.O.T? If not - sorry for comparing apples with oranges.
-
@Modes said
"Jim you state that The Star Sapphire and The Star Ruby, the N.O.X. are of use then one is 5=6. As I understand it is your opinion but not C.O.T/T.O.T.? The thing is that in Liber ABA pt. 3 the Star Ruby is listed as A.:A.: Probationer and Star Sapphire as Zelator work.."
Quick answer - I haven't had time to go back and review all of the above.
Yes, the A.'.A.'. curriculum has this provided in 2=9, the grade where the Formula of the Rosy Cross is first formally begun to be studied. A very great deal is started in 2=9 that finds its fruits in 5=6. (Compare One Star in Sight's different statements about the Formula R.C. for 2=9 and 5=6.)
-
There's a lot of discussion what the Star Sapphire ritual is used for. Some say it is a HGA invocation but looking at the A.:A.: system the HGA invocation is at the Adeptus grade. As you cite, Crowley did the ritual only once etc, but it is included as a Zelator ritual, so this means that the known ritual is an adopted version, why did you emphasise the fact in the first place I have no idea. It is clear that noone teaches at the Zelator grade the ritual Crowley talks about in your citation...
Could you write for what the Zelator uses the ritual? Could you recommend some sources to read about the Rosy Cross formula? Are there any traces of it in published GD documents? -
@Modes said
"It is clear that noone teaches at the Zelator grade the ritual Crowley talks about in your citation..."
Why clear? It's not even true."Could you write for what the Zelator uses the ritual?"
Well, among other things, the Zelator begins to study the formula of the Rosy Cross.
"Could you recommend some sources to read about the Rosy Cross formula?"
This is so intimate and personal a thing that I think it should be left for the Zelator to discuss with his or her Practicus.
-
Hehe.
So, you say that I can't tell you and can't give you a hint but I have this thread up about it trying people to help out by not answering some important questions. 
You answered your question yourself - to study means to do the ritual many times and to say that Star Sapphire is done only once is contrary to the word "study". Now I hope in A.:A.: Zelator the word "study" does not imply sophy but filosophy i.e. not talking about it but doing.
So O & X is not the Rosy Cross formula you mentioned? -
@Modes said
"Hehe.
So, you say that I can't tell you and can't give you a hint but I have this thread up about it trying people to help out by not answering some important questions. "Some of these questions are appropriate only for an individual's immediate instructor in the Order.
"So O & X is not the Rosy Cross formula you mentioned?"
Certainly could be. Depends on what you mean by O & X.
-
I don't know!
It's only you Jim I found mentioning this sign in this ritual. How can I second that? By analyzing sources you read and came to that conclusion. So far I found this sign mentioned in GD as the sigil of Jupiter, in Crowley as St.Andrews Cross and in Grant the Mark of the Beast as phalus and kteis. I see you write that the Star Sapphire has nothing to do with sex magick so you disagree with Grant. And you can't show your sources why you think so. I guess the discussion is over. -
@Modes said
"I see you write that the Star Sapphire has nothing to do with sex magick so you disagree with Grant."
Those weren't my words. BTW, I have no trouble disagreeing with Grant, for whose writings have essential no respect at all. What I wrote was:
@JAE said
"It is possible to interpret this ceremony as a formula of sexual magick. Many have sought to do so. Within the peripheral membership of Ordo Templi Orientis, such an interpretation is com-monplace. Nor do we dispute that The Star Sapphire can be readily adapted to that purpose. However, we do assert that this sexual interpretation is not the perspective from which the ritual was first written."
That's quite different from what you quoted me as saying.
"And you can't show your sources why you think so."
There are no written sources to cite. That's why I wrote the article in the first place.
-
Sorry, I missed the full meaning of your words.
-
Kenneth Grant - that controversial?
Thanks,
In L.V.X.,
chrys333 -
@Jim Eshelman said
"
@YHVH said
"I have found online at least 4 or 5 variations of the full ARARITA, with slight alterations each. Most often I stumble into "Achad Rosh Achadotho Rosh Ichudo Temurazo Achad". Is this the -correct- "full" ARARITA???"There are various Hebrew dialects, plus there has been a tendency in the West for a century or two to not actually bother to be careful with such things. Still, slight variations are possible under different dialectical rules.
I did my most careful transliteration of it when writing the third edition of The Mystical & Magical System of the A.'.A.'. - I wanted the transliteration for a few remarks on Liber ARARIThA. Understand that ch is used below for the sound of Cheth (halfway between H and K, roughly), here it is:
Echad rosh ache'dutho rosh yichudutho t'muratho echad.
The initial vowel in this formf AChD is the "e" sound, not "a" (they are different words). I'm not sure where you ran into the z in the next-to-last word, since the Hebrew is a Tav.
"the hebrew "z" is supposed to be pronounsed "zs" as in Enochian and English or "ts" as in German???"
Zayin is pronounced like the English z as in zebra. (I don't know why you give this as "zs," but perhaps that communicates it in your gonue?) It is quite distinct from the Tzaddi, which is close to the English tz but is technically a flattened, extremely sibilant s (a single sound, rather than the "two sounds" people usually make with "tz." It's nearly identical to the middle sound in the familiar word pizza."
Some questions:
Does anyone know of an online audio resource for the full pronounciation of the Ararita formula?
Planetary work:
A friend recommended using the Star Sapphire as a template for planetary work (preceded by the Star Ruby) wherein the planetary sign to be invoked is instead drawn in the four quarters and sigil traced therein. Does this sound correct or is the LRH a better template for planetary work?Lastly, I've never worked with Star Sapphire before and am extremely apprehensive given 1) past experiences with lesser rituals 2) the fact Crowley only performed this once and 3) his words "if you dare" with regard to NOX signs. What would be prerequisite training for readiness to try the Star Sapphire?
-
@h2h said
"Does anyone know of an online audio resource for the full pronounciation of the Ararita formula? "
I don't. We've always taught it in person.
"A friend recommended using the Star Sapphire as a template for planetary work (preceded by the Star Ruby) wherein the planetary sign to be invoked is instead drawn in the four quarters and sigil traced therein. Does this sound correct or is the LRH a better template for planetary work?"
I'd use the standard Hexagram ritual for any planet-specific work.
" I've never worked with Star Sapphire before and am extremely apprehensive given 1) past experiences with lesser rituals 2) the fact Crowley only performed this once and 3) his words "if you dare" with regard to NOX signs. What would be prerequisite training for readiness to try the Star Sapphire?"
I'm not inclined to generalize. In the A.'.A.'. it isn't assigned directly for study until 2=9, but this doesn't preclude earlier levels. Essentially, if you are ready to directly undertake the go-for-broke aspiration to the K&C of the HGA, then I know you're ready for this.
If you're concerned about the warning of the N.O.X. signs, don't use them. That's the whole point of the admonishment. Instead, use the L.V.X. formulae.
BTW, I take Crowley's statement that he performed it only once to mean that he initially attained to the K&C of the HGA only once. IMNSHO this is the real ritual of the Star Sapphire independent of what ceremonial form is used.
-
Thanks for the replies Jim.
@Jim Eshelman said
"
" I've never worked with Star Sapphire before and am extremely apprehensive given 1) past experiences with lesser rituals 2) the fact Crowley only performed this once and 3) his words "if you dare" with regard to NOX signs. What would be prerequisite training for readiness to try the Star Sapphire?"I'm not inclined to generalize. In the A.'.A.'. it isn't assigned directly for study until 2=9, but this doesn't preclude earlier levels. Essentially, if you are ready to directly undertake the go-for-broke aspiration to the K&C of the HGA, then I know you're ready for this"
Is KCHGA such that one only attains or does not attain? Or is there such a thing as premature or abortive KCHGA, but the person becomes labelled as a psychotic/paranoid schizophrenic etc?
-
@h2h said
"Is KCHGA such that one only attains or does not attain? Or is there such a thing as premature or abortive KCHGA, but the person becomes labelled as a psychotic/paranoid schizophrenic etc?"
One attained, there is ongoing deepening for a long time. But the event itself is singular, striking, decisive in the same way that, say, birth is singular, striking, and decisive.
There are earlier intimations and even communications with the Angel - often long before. But these shouldn't be confused with the event of the K&C.
Abortive instances are, well, abortive. They don't succeed. They aren't it. Yes, sometimes an unprepared and psychologically unhealthy person opens this case and it deranges them - aside from the fact that it's possible for even healthy people to be labelled psychotic (but that's another matter).