Q.B.L. and Achad's Attributions
-
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
Hello All,
I was hoping to get some sort of a general opinion of Achad's attributions (as explained in his book Q.B.L.), if anyone cares to comment on them. They are definitely some interesting attributions, and I can't say that I entirely disagree with his interpretations.
I really don't care to get into an Achad/Crowley personal character debate (as opposed to a Hebrew character debate
), as if anyone could add anything more than conjecture.If any one has worked with the Paths, according to the new attributions, or would even like to compare them to Crowley's, I think it would make for an interesting thread. I would love to hear any input regarding the attributions, even as it relates to personal experience.
Love is the law, love under will.
-
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
Hello All,
I was hoping to get some sort of a general opinion of Achad's attributions (as explained in his book Q.B.L.), if anyone cares to comment on them. They are definitely some interesting attributions, and I can't say that I entirely disagree with his interpretations.
I really don't care to get into an Achad/Crowley personal character debate (as opposed to a Hebrew character debate
), as if anyone could add anything more than conjecture.If any one has worked with the Paths, according to the new attributions, or would even like to compare them to Crowley's, I think it would make for an interesting thread. I would love to hear any input regarding the attributions, even as it relates to personal experience.
Love is the law, love under will.
There is at least one other long thread on this on the forum. You might want to read through the following (and there may be more threads I'm forgetting):
<!-- l --><a class="postlink-local" href="http://heruraha.net/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=433">viewtopic.php?f=20&t=433</a><!-- l --> -
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.
Hello All,
I was hoping to get some sort of a general opinion of Achad's attributions (as explained in his book Q.B.L.), if anyone cares to comment on them. They are definitely some interesting attributions, and I can't say that I entirely disagree with his interpretations.
I really don't care to get into an Achad/Crowley personal character debate (as opposed to a Hebrew character debate
), as if anyone could add anything more than conjecture.If any one has worked with the Paths, according to the new attributions, or would even like to compare them to Crowley's, I think it would make for an interesting thread. I would love to hear any input regarding the attributions, even as it relates to personal experience.
Love is the law, love under will.
Thanks, Jim.
Love is the law, love under will.