kundalini definition
-
@gerry456 said
"Yeah, many are called but few are chosen. Ha, few are chosen. I like it when xtianity and Thelema converge."
There's the opposite perspective:
@Liber X, v. 9 said
"This Knowledge is not for all men; few indeed are called, but of these few many are chosen."
-
"Each star is unique, and each orbit apart; indeed, that is the cornerstone of my teaching, to have no standard goals or standard ways, no othordoxies and no codes.
...... .... ...
Magick is the art of causing change in existing phenomena. This definition includes raising the dead, bewitching cattle, making rain, acquiring goods, fascinating judges, and all the rest of the programme. Good: but it also includes every act soever? Yes; I meant it to do so. It is not possible to utter word or do deed without producing the exact effect proper and necessary thereto. Thus Magick is the Art of Life itself."
- Aleister Crowley.
Allow me to highlight: "to have no standard goals or standard ways"
-
@Takamba said
"Wasn't that in When Harry Met Sally? No, I've never done that to someone or had it done to me. We've got completely off topic (and I have my suspicions why a certain poster keeps getting off topic in various threads)."
I'd love to know how Tantic massage (which manipulates kindalini energy) is off topic.
I've booked a session with a Tantric therapist a few weeks or so away. Will let you know how it goes.
-
@gerry456 said"
@Takamba said
"Wasn't that in When Harry Met Sally? No, I've never done that to someone or had it done to me. We've got completely off topic (and I have my suspicions why a certain poster keeps getting off topic in various threads)."I'd love to know how Tantic massage (which manipulates kindalini energy) is off topic.
I've booked a session with a Tantric therapist a few weeks or so away. Will let you know how it goes."
I'm stating the opinion that this has gotten off topic (talking about reiki sexual devices of dubious validity) based on Jim's previous use of the opinion when the question "why is khabs plural" was simply answered and then the thread was deemed off topic. The original topic is kundalini compared to prana compared to chi. I believe the topic has run it's course and if you want to discus specific models of something, you might prefer a unique thread.
-
@Takamba said
"(and I have my suspicions why a certain poster keeps getting off topic in various threads)."
This wouldn't have anything to do with a certain poster's leave of absence that almost exactly coincides with the friendly ghost infestation would it? Because that sort of reasoning is just fallacious, my friend.
-
@Gnosomai Emauton said
"
@Takamba said
"(and I have my suspicions why a certain poster keeps getting off topic in various threads)."This wouldn't have anything to do with a certain poster's leave of absence that almost exactly coincides with the friendly ghost infestation would it? Because that sort of reasoning is just fallacious, my friend.
"Not as specifically as you think I think, but related. I'm not suggesting it is either party specifically, but obviously one who is aware, and who sharing some of the same topics but from the opposite point of view.
*personally I support neither extreme of these specific topics (hence my quoting of Crowley earlier). My point is that extremism is the issue.
-
@gerry456 said
"I asked if khabs were plural. Jim clarified it, so thread over. I don't see the big deal."
No big deal is being made. Here you've asked "Is kundalini same thing as chi I.e. prana?" It has been answered. Do you always need Jim to tell you it has been clarified?
Anything beyond that is off topic.