Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∴A∴
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

Reading excerpt of Book of the Law

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Thelema
12 Posts 5 Posters 352 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    AliceKnewIt
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I have an offer to read chapter 1 on April 8th at the art gallery where my painting of Nuit is showing. But the curator hesitates on how long.... It takes me 15 minutes to read the whole chapter - she wants me to make it shorter. How would it be to read only part of chapter 1 ? And which part would I read?

    Feels weird to read only part of it... but maybe that would work? It would be part of a poetry and music event, not centered on Holy Days, just a coincidence that it's a Holy Day.

    Any thoughts on this?

    Thank you, 93s

    T S A A H 11 Replies Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Takamba
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #2

    Attempt to make it shorter by reading faster? but I wouldn't otherwise concede any changes. If it can't be done in total, don't do it.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • S Offline
    S Offline
    seekinghga
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #3

    Yeah, I have to agree with Takamba. Or, if you must cut it short, stop at verse 93.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    AliceKnewIt
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #4

    I've decided to not read it at all if I can't read the whole thing.

    Thanks
    93 93/93

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Avshalom Binyamin
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #5

    What's wrong with reading a passage from it? Seems to be ok for the priestess in the Gnostic Mass.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hermitas
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #6

    I was wondering the same thing - minus the reference, but still.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    AliceKnewIt
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #7

    Part of my decision is that this would be a last-minute inclusion in a pre-planned event.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Avshalom Binyamin
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #8

    Understood, and you're free to read it or not, for whatever personal reason. "Feels weird" is a good enough reason.

    This thread seemed to imply that there is some rule against reading Chapter 1 of the Book of the Law at all in front of people unless you can read it in it's entirety. And I was asking if such a thing existed, or it was all just personal feelings.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    AliceKnewIt
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #9

    It's just personal feelings.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Takamba
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #10

    @Avshalom Binyamin said

    "This thread seemed to imply..."

    Clever choice of words, it abdicates all responsibility from any party. And it's not true.

    The thread seemed no such, it implied nothing of the sort. My take was simply in Art.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Avshalom Binyamin
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #11

    Ok...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Avshalom Binyamin
    replied to AliceKnewIt on last edited by
    #12

    Seem: give the impression or sensation of being something or having a particular quality

    "If it can't be done in total, don't do it."

    This gave me the impression that there is an implied rule here against doing it in total. I guess there's not. So it didn't really imply that after all. It just seemed to, to me.

    I'm pretty happy with my word choice. And you seem to be happy with your word choice too. Yay for us! 😆

    As Liber Legis says:

    Had!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups