All language is limited and every holy book becomes outdated on some levels as humans evolve, or there would be no need for more holy books.
Trans people are obviously, unequivocally every bit as much stars as anyone else, however they identify--as men, women, or of nonbinary gender.
Gavin McInnis, founder of the Proud Boys (violent, white supremacist gang) in the middle.
"“Fighting solves everything. We need more violence from the Trump people. Trump supporters: choke a motherfucker. Choke a bitch. Choke a tranny. Get your fingers around the windpipe. If some guy with a slightly punk demeanor comes up to you and says ‘Hey are you Sal? Are you pro-Trump?’ Choke him. Trust your instincts, don’t listen to what he has to say, choke him.”"
Robert Bowers, the Nazi who massacred 11 people in a synagogue last weekend, was a big fan. Here's a tweet of his from the day of the shooting:
"First Trump came for the Charlottesville 4 but kept supporting Trump because he is better than Hillary Clinton. Then Trump came for the Rise Above Movement but I kept supporting Trump because he is better than Hillary Clinton. Then Trump came for the Proud Boys but I kept supporting Trump because he is better than Hillary Clinton. Then Trump came for me and there was no one left to suppor..."
The guy on the left and right were best buddies. On the left is Max Hare, who was arraigned in New York last week for felony gang violence, for following his dumb dear leader Gavin, and assaulting some liberals.
The guy on the right is Max Hare's best buddy, Matthew Lyons, another proud boy, who died of a drug overdose.
Nothing is wrong with the picture. Max and Matt are obviously following their True Wills, which is to be entertainment for those of us who like to laugh at Nazis.
If you actually ask the questions, you'll arrive at a different conclusion than Irving, who denies even the well-documented fact that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz.
"Documents including blueprints of the killing installations as well as orders for construction materials and Zyklon B (the deadly hydrogen cyanide preparation used for gassings at Auschwitz and Majdanek...carbon monoxide exhaust was used at other camps) survived the war as did some of the actual gassing facilities themselves. Photos clandestinely taken by prisoners of Auschwitz-Birkenau even show the disposal of corpses removed from the gas chamber. The manufacture, distribution and use of the deadly gas was clearly demonstrated at the "Zyklon B Trial" in March 1946, Hamburg, Germany. Two of the defendants, Bruno Tesch and Karl Weinbacher, the owner and a major executive of a company that manufactured the gas were sentenced to death after notes of their trips to Auschwitz disproved their contention that they were unaware that the poison was used to kill inmates.
Jean-Claude Pressac, a one-time skeptic of the gas chambers, had undertaken a careful study of Auschwitz in which he analyzed a wide variety of camp documents, photos, reports and blueprints. Pressac, who had at one time been intrigued by the Holocaust-denying theories of Robert Faurisson, concluded that his original skepticism could no longer be supported in the face of the evidence. In 1989, the Klarsfeld Foundation published his study, Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers, in which Pressac demonstrates the use of the gas chambers of Auschwitz-Birkenau in the murders of hundreds of thousands of people."
[motlc dot wiesenthal dot com/site/pp.asp?c=gvKVLcMVIuG&b=394667]
Jean-Claude Pressac was a French chemist who decided to research the Holocaust in an attempt to disprove it, but when he saw the evidence first-hand, he realized he was a big fat idiot.
"Pressac visited Auschwitz Birkenau ten times between 1979 and 1984, according to registered letter from the Auschwitz Museum director Kazimierz Smoleń, sent on 11 September 1985. Pressac used only authentic documents concerning the construction of crematoria and the gas chambers, which originated from the Nazi German office of Zentral Bauleitung der Waffen SS. Museum staff provided him with assistance, convinced of his honourable intentions.[5] Pressac was given access to blueprints which had survived due to being located in the construction office rather than the administrative offices. The analysis of material proof convinced him that his former views shaped by the Faurisson case were in error."
It's an illusion. His comment is just as much of an Atlantis as everyone else's. He's just tricked himself into thinking it's any different.
(Kind of a paradox, continually telling people to mind their own business..)
In the meantime, if a bunch of us--but not all of us--just "mind our own business", that's kind of how stuff like fascism stands a chance.
I don't see a point in arguing about it. You clearly have a subjective personal belief that your committed to.
No, I don't need to defend someone's expression of consensual sexuality to you, and I don't accept that the relationship model you call natural is even that.
The nuclear family is an industrial age creation. If we had been in nuclear families for very long you wouldn't see such extreme variation in milk production, for one.
"Natural" for humans in general is a fluid mix of tribal links, monogamish pair bonding, and promiscuity. On the individual level, it can be anything. Humans do thrive on connection, but the form that connection takes can be varied.
I don't see the bias or sugarcoating in that. Any relationship, short or long, can by toxic or healthy.
I know it's a nazi tendency to prescribe one way of being and pretend it's the best for everyone, but nahhh it isn't.
"if that equates a busy-body sexually with different people during a short period of time while having the opportunity to be in a stable relationship then something is off"
What is off is the slut-shaming attitude about other people's choices.
Sexual promiscuity can be either toxic or holy. Stable monogamous relationships can be either toxic or holy.
"Name calling? Nah. It's called idea-calling. (Every man and every woman is a star!) You really think that your post is relevant or helpful? Pfft. Go back to your propaganda efforts elsewhere. HAHHAHAHAHA"
They sure talk up a storm about how PC culture is Stalin/Mao censorship, and everyone needs to grow a thicker skin because the racists are just engaging in a little developmentally healthy race baiting and innocent spouting off.
But criticize any of their ideas and they melt like a snowflake.
@Nineborn said
"How should i deal with resentment? Invasive thoughts about past betrayals ? Basically dealing with the past. I realize we create our reality going forward, but i keep looking for some spiritual guidance to dealing with these things that are past related. I guess Im trying to find some principle that helps me realize everything is my own doing. That would make me less hurt and angry if i could internalize the fact that i somehow create all experiences myself. Because i still get floods of negative feelings when i think of certain betrayals by the person in with right now and its been a huge obstacle in my progress...in anything."
Have you studied the chakras?
Promiscuity and jealousy and controlling behaviors are all issues of the first three chakras. If you have an overactive/under-active/blockage in those chakras, then yes, you will manifest those issues. Cheating and continually being cheated are similar energies (just from the opposite side of the experience it), so it's not surprising that you encounter it.
It's not karma per se, it's more a birds of a feather principle.
Study your chakras, work on imbalances, do MPR, whatever they tell you you need to to raise your vibration and shake off the stuff that's weighing you down (false beliefs, denial, guilt).
Abdulaziz, fyi I've hidden your comments, so if you've replied to me, I won't see it. I imagine it's something pro-nazi, and therefore idiotic.
@Abdulaziz said
"what's so hard to understand or even remotely 'racist' about that?"
The original inhabitants of the United States are native Americans, not white people. Nazis/racists/Trump and his supporters are pissed that we even talk about the genocide we committed against them, or the treaties we are actively breaking.
Black people have been in America for as long as white colonists. The nazis in that picture were pissed off because a statue of confederate officer who had fought to preserve slavery was being removed.
The United States has allowed and continued to allow immigration. We can stop it, or reduce it. However the nazis/racists/Trump and his supporters want to limit it based on--you guessed it--race. The supreme court has struck down his travel bans for this reason.
Bonus round:
Saudi Arabia had legal slavery until 1962. The law only changed because of outside pressure.
Saudi Arabia is a tier 3 nation when it comes to human trafficking. This means that though slavery is technically illegal they don't take the minimum actions to stop slavery, and have no plans to. They don't prosecute it, and they punish complainers.
(Maybe you should redirect some of your anger about Israel toward your country, which has many human rights issues. You know, if you really care about human rights issues, and aren't just a Jew-hating nazi)
Conclusion:
Since racists have no problem with knee-jerk shame-bases labeling of people based on their skin color (to quote Takamba, it's just harmless spouting), it follows that they have no problem with knee-jerk shame based labeling of people based on their choice to spout racism.
They don't give people of other races the benefit of the doubt. I see know need to give them the benefit of the doubt and hair-split whether their variety of bigotry is really racist.
It is.
The state of Israel has committed atrocities against the Palestinian people. I think it's racist and awful.
Plenty of thelemites feel the same.
Non-nazis can have a rational conversation about it.
But you're a nazi, Abdulaziz, and the only point of the discussion for you is to make you feel good about the holocaust.
Just an fyi, Takamba, in case you were replying to me, I've hidden your posts and won't see what you have to say (I assume--based on your post history--that it's something pro-nazi).
People: if your reasoning leads you to support the murder of innocent people by nazis, you can be 99.9% sure you're reasoning on the matter is disconnected from nuit.
You are attached to defending nazi rights.
You have invested energy in it. You've violated your own promise (to ignore my posts) because you're so invested in defending nazis.
"Man has a right to move as he will on the face of the earth "
"Man has a right to speak what he will"
The people on the train were just going home from work.
If a nazi telling people to get out of America, and calling them racial slurs isn't a violation of their will, then telling the nazi to shut up isn't either.
If the nazi was justified in murdering people for standing in between him and the victims of his verbal assault, then I'm justified in murdering nazis for existing.
The fact that you want to have it one way, in favor of the nazi, makes you a nazi sympathizer. You're not being mis-labeled.
@Takamba said
"Sorry about your loss, by the way."
Spare me. According to your interpretation of Liber Oz, interfering with a racist who is spewing hate-speech is interfering with someone's right to think as they will. So the Nazi was justified in killing them. 
@Mercurius said
"It's funny how scared you are. "
It's funny how bad you stupid nazis are at reading people's emotions.
But then again, Nazis aren't renowned for their social skills.
(By the way, I was mocking the nazism, not the dick-sucking. Why don't nazis ever understand a joke?)
Oh, I know. It's an implied threat.
Mercurius has previously directed Nazi terminology at me before, calling me a "Portland degenerate" ("degenerate" is a nazi-era code word for attacking Jews)
This week is the 1-year anniversary of a Nazi killing two people on the light rail line in Portland (a mile from my house) by slashing their throats when they stood between him and the muslim women he was lobbing slurs at.
But I just can't muster up any fear over such sad losers. It's not even worth it to punch a nazi, because it's so hard to wash the sh** smell off your knuckles.
I will, however, laugh at them when they get themselves arrested for dumb stuff like incest-based domestic squabbles, or get kicked out of their parents' basement for not paying rent.
And I will mock dumb nazi-sympathizers like Takamba who think the real problem is my intolerance and hyper-sensitivity to hate-speech. F*ck you Takamba! Sorry you're still mad at your mom about the way she potty-trained you.
@Takamba said
"And you aren't intolerant.
Yes. I get all this. I also have watched you miss label people and then simply all that ranting and raging up there in this quoted text. Thank you for that. I know of you now all I need."
Nazi sympathizer calls me intolerant.
Are my posts as bad as the holocaust?
Can't wait to see what you call me if I make fun of NAMBLA.
I will stop mocking when you stop using the same arguments as nazis.
I get that you think you're doing it to bug liberals or make a point.
Plenty of actual ww2 nazis put the uniform on to rile up their neighbors.
But eventually dramatic irony collapses and lo and behold: you're a bigot.
"We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be."
Regardless of whether you think you are or aren't racist, you're behaving exactly like one.
By acting like a racist, you are asking to be treated like a racist, and are getting offended when you are.
It's karma.
Hitler wasn't racist.
A nazi is saying someone else is ignorant.
Dude, I'm not afraid of dumb nazis. And I'm not in the OTO so no, you won't see me at Sekhet Mast.
Every nazi is a loser who can't accept that they are a loser, so they make up dumb lies about other races.
But I'm sure that one day all the nazis will win and then you'll have a stable job and your involuntary celibacy streak will be over.
Now I'm going to watch a video of your leader, Christopher Cantwell, blubbering about being arrested, and laugh my ass off.
And I'll also laugh about how David Irving has to sell nazi memorabilia to make a living because he bankrupted himself losing a libel case against people who said he was a shitty idiot historian.
In case it's not clear:
Nazi = loser that people laugh at because they're so dumb.
There are zero nazis who aren't losers. Why is that, Mercurius?