@Alrah said
"
@he atlas itch said
"Alrah – I might agree dwelling on past lives is congratulatory self-wanking if I only have memories of historically important people. But it’s a catch-22 since existing historical records are usually of important people – history is written by the winners – and therefore no records remain of a field hand who lived during the Middle Ages. That’s why piecing together the past involves exploring both the personal unconscious and sifting through historical evidence. What I’m convinced of is the signs related to one’s True Will remain constant throughout an incarnation, in recurring motifs and obsessions, sometimes physical evidence on the body, the circumstances into which one is born into, etc.
Does it matter in the here and now? Only if you think remembering your past - from childhood to present - has helped in you in any way. Dwelling on past lives merely extends the field of inquiry. The questions one tends to ask, by analogy, become bigger."
Oh, I don't think it makes much difference whether you think you were important in your last life or not unless you simply want to address the dangers of ego inflation. That's not the main 'thing'. It's the sense of continuity that the ego is attached to. 'I Am', 'I Have Been' & 'I Will Be' is comfort food for it. It's more difficult to throw the whole thing overboard and think - 'when I die I will be no more'. The ego finds it frightening. Magick threatens the ego - which is why I believe so many occults get into the whole investigation of past life themes. There seems to be an excuse for it, but really - until a person looses thier fear of not being a person then shouldn't these investigations wait?
It smells a bit 'spiritualist' to me. "
Alrah, I don't think spiritualists believe in reincarnation, their thing is contacting discarnate spirits.
Exploring one's past lifes is not about comfort. And from what I can tell, the "I" does not survive. So losing the fear of not being a person is a given.