Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

Public Discussion

4.8k Topics 45.8k Posts

Subcategories


  • 37 Topics
    192 Posts
    christianbryantC
    93 I recently picked up an old book that seems to have great application to current technological currents. It is "The Human Use of Human Beings" by Norbert Wiener, written in 1950. I'm not very familiar with him, though his name has been mentioned in transhumanism discussions. He was a mathematician who apparently was at the heart of the early cybernetics movement. I learned of it watching a talk with technologist Jaron Lanier who mentioned the book as an early warning of the domination of certain technological advancements over the quality of human life. I was expecting a dry read, but his outlook and language is surprisingly modern and reminds me of why I was drawn to early science fiction writers like Ray Bradbury, Phillip K. Dick and Robert Heinlein. There is a spark of Crowley-like sardonic humor in there, as well. Only half-way through, but thus far it is quite the read and well worth it. 93 93/93
  • A place to be less intellectual.

    3 4
    3 Topics
    4 Posts
    augurA
    0: The pain of division is as nothing: All knowledge is inversion, a result of lack, longing—a reflection, a negation. Warmth, the absence of cold; shadows only cast by forms bathed in light; self, perceptible only in distinction from Other—the Divine concealed solely by perception, a boundary, stubborn dissonance. A relationship through negation, for something to be known—ignorance either exists or must be assumed, remnants of the forgotten, reviled, and neglected—cast away as shells, mementos awaiting remembering. Words manifest Something from Nothing, pure darkness: language—distinctions, differentiation, definitions, more words. All words are sacred—singular and purposeful, conceptually pure—all interpretations aside. Objects, containers, bridging order to chaos, dispersion, illusion. Rhythms of memory, sonic arrangements, symbolically represented, communal sacraments, themselves the shadows on the wall, ideal forms, miraculous, alluring, enchanting reflections, lacking context—detail. Veils. Smiles. Describe the chair, in its chairness. What is that image? Now consider all possible other chairs. Do all these share the qualities described? What is inherent? The quality of an object that is sat upon? What makes a rock, a table, a bed, a stump, a horse, your partner—not a chair? What is a chair upon which you cannot sit? Is a chair a relation to intention, of purpose? Does the rock, table, bed, stump, horse, partner become a chair because it is so deemed? Concepts, vibrations, forms, manifestation. High rates of oscillation generate greater density, rigidity, solidity—the outcome of this ecstatic dance, certainty: like an Oak, a Mountain, a wall. With time, water and wind carve crevices, contours—eventually springs, creeks, rivers, canyons, valleys, seas. The fertility, the wealth of what was—a wall, an Oak, a Mountain nourishing the valley floor, the coral bed. Longing gives way to attraction, Attraction gives way to certainty, Certainty gives way to longing anew. The colors are many, and the Light is one. I AM, divided for love’s sake: In wholeness, there is stillness, quiet—Absolute peace, ineffable, indiscernible, undifferentiated, void of thought, before word, and without consideration of deed. From the assertion of No Thing sprang forth a boundless view, a joyous light from whence descended a tumultuous darkness. From the darkness issued a terrible cry, indecipherable, preceding language, meaning. As if in response, the Word came forth from the Light—creation, the initial form, a precise vibration, solace, a reminder. In each opposition, lies a resolution in complements—reverse polarities, repulsion becomes attraction. Of the Ordeals, refuse none, know and destroy the consoler and the consoled. Weight—avoidance, denial, shame—all-consuming fear, cycling, annihilation, release. Context a surface, a theatre for rehearsing dramas of tension, scripted narratives, bad faith. In seeking only Beauty, there is the quest for the grails, the heart of Truth. If imagination can render Sisyphus happy, healthy, grateful, then of what consequence is Ordeal? Sorrow is but a shadow, a ringing in the ear, passing, and there is that which remains—All existence is pure joy. Desire is a veil, a wound, a chalice. Satiety belies completeness, self-satisfied, base climax and refractory repose, holding an idol before Truth. A seemingly vast emptiness, unfathomable, desperate, eager to be filled perpetually, only to be consumed, left barren, bare—no closure, no proliferation, no maturation, no scar, open—a commitment to suffering, inviolate. When this rent becomes mended, and then hardened, smoothed, shaped, refined, first as wood and then of silver—reflections, Remembrance. Matter, appearing unaware, seeming inert, is full of spirit. Within the God of Spinoza, how could it be otherwise? Against a grey-mauve wall of rock, all variation, every edge, blend. Natives of this clime see a stairway to heaven, while it is insurmountable, or abysmal to the eye, the perspective of an alien. Hubris under these conditions, unawareness, bad faith, shortcuts portend utter destruction, calamity—the stone indifferent, success cannot be feigned. For the chance of union: Absolute Absence is fallacious, a jest, as is anything absolute. A secret always betrays its mystery, the Singular implies none, Multitude, the ineffable a terrible din. Any first by necessity is, must be the last of what was, is, could have been. Initiation, remembrance—differentiation conveys wholeness. To Be—or not to Be, that is the question. The Bard proclaimed: the heartache of a thousand shocks, t’is the consummation which all devout longing did manifest. “Come unto me” is a foolish turn of phrase: for it is I that goes. A breath, a pause, a moment will be filled by a wondering thought, attention to Other in action, the Word of God, the vibration, Light, Love, Liberty, Life. In a boundless expanse, without beginning and without end—every point is the center—each thought unto itself a cosmos, every action destroyer of worlds, and the Word—regenerator of the world, the little world, heart and tongue. These spaces, shrouds—suggesting, divulging without detail that which is below, within. Anonymity is small, hermetic, a veil; Unanimity truth, understanding, balance. Sun, child, hero, villain, saint, sinner—upon the precipice, with confidence, hubris. The dogs nipping, encouragement, and with leaping laughter that next pace, into the abyss, uncertainty, adventure, unquestionable success. The only failure diffidence, hesitation, the infernal question—”why?,” because yielding inaction, calcification, stagnation. Facets, perceptions, conceptions, belief—actors, pretenders to authorship clinging tightly to saccharin, false, idols of self. With every sacrifice, freedom, every surrender a becoming. A king relinquishes certainty, a saint relinquishes purity, a lover relinquishes solitude. The Word loving its reflection, can only descend, enter, to dwell therein. Imbibing in sense, rapture, intrigue, the sole mystery hidden, secreted away as its revelation, too soon, too prescient, would bring calamity, ruin. This ecstatic dance reaches a fever pitch, a vibratory rate, intense, locking in patterns, emergent definitions, manifestation, solidity. From this stage, expression, myriad, the players unaware of the script, roles. Lovers getting closest to the truth. Losing self in Other, a model, a trinket suggesting the One reality, the joy of dissolution All. 1: The Abyss: When the locus of identity is centered externally—a willful rejection of truth, unmoored, impermanent, changeable, passivity in the world of action, the world of service—the personality eventually manifests the conditions for the ultimate betrayal: the abandonment of Self, the true heresy, the unpardonable sin. Nothing is gained that is not inherently present; nothing may be redeemed that could possibly be lost. Redemption is a bad word, for it presumes debt, deficiency, an account awaiting settlement. A Star, as a result of function, of nature, radiates light and life, sustenance and joy to All, without diminution of substance or effulgence, approximately forever. Every thought, every word, every deed alters the balance of worlds both seen and unseen. To understand all things, to love all things, to perform all things, to endure all things—these are not virtues, they cannot be worn like badges, grasping for acknowledgement—they are consequences, choices, participation, engagement. The task is not the salvation of others, what is being saved? What or who is being protected? The hubris necessary to make such assumptions exposes a deep insecurity, a grave misUnderstanding. Every piece of thinking meat is ignorant of something, at some point— experiences, opportunities, curiosities being infinite, and the limitations of capacity being quite finite. The aim is Remembrance, as if to awaken from an ageless sleep, to a Great Inheritance, already possessed. Therefore worship is a path. Not hierarchical worship, nor worship of authority, but reverence toward the secret flame burning in the heart of each beast, each child, and each sage. To approach another with absolute respect is not sentimentality, it is discipline, it is recognition. Those honored to serve humanity, via earned, lived, conscious, true compassion gradually step by step become incapable of contempt. Distinctions vanish, every distinction reveals another facet of the One Light. Humility is born, not of weakness, but from lived experience, perspective. 2: The Image: Descending through the firmament, the Word came to rest upon the Water, bringing calm, at the point of impact, rippling outward concentrically for eternity. Perspectives shifted; those things above the mists, in the Air and the fire of Light, assumed the qualities of the Light—effervescent, beauteous, orderly. As the Waters settled, and the Heavens were arranged by the Administration of the Active, there arose the possibility of seeing. Distinction. Above and Below. Light and Shadow. Nature, astonished by Being, swooned deeply upon the face of the Divine, ordered itself to convey this beauty, to reflect it. The Reflection: Anthrōpos beheld the Image and was filled with wonder. Narcissus beheld the Image and was consumed with desire. Anthrōpos saw Beauty and sought relation, unity. Narcissus saw Beauty and sought domination, possession. Anthrōpos found completion in the reflection. Narcissus only saw self in the reflection. Anthrōpos found a doorway. Narcissus built a prison. Anthrōpos entered the world. Narcissus abandoned the world. Anthrōpos engaged, became participant. Narcissus obsessed, became spectator. Anthrōpos loved the Beloved. Narcissus loved the Image. Anthrōpos remembered. Narcissus forgot. The Interplay: Beauty itself is without intention, beyond motivation, it is an Echo of Remembrance. Is Truth self-serving, could it ever be? No! Beauty does not assert—beauty is expression, beauty is revelation, realization, balance—harmony. Mountains do not demand admiration, nor does a flower require affection. The Beloved does not compel devotion, demands not aught in sacrifice, makes no condition. All such longings, fascinations, obsessions, appreciations can only arise within the observer. Beauty is a recognition in the Heart, a recognition of Truth. 3: Is a God to live in a dog? If the dog were merely, solely, only a dog in its dogness, what is it that draws reverence? What inspires affection, reciprocity? What hidden splendor peers through those deep, dark, soulful eyes? To worship the dog is not to mistake it for a god, but to recognize that God has not failed to inhabit the dog. Identity, an expression of individuality, uniqueness, belonging. Amongst infinite possibility, infinite variation, infinite diversity, what is a Thelemite, a Christian, a Muslim, a Buddhist, a Jew? Does the name reveal the Star, or merely a passing fashion, a t-shirt, shiftless? Is identity consistent with True Will, or a refuge from it? When does belonging cease to be communion and become enclosure? At what point does distinction become separation? Unexamined identity is Bad Faith. What begins as orientation hardens into certainty; what begins as communion becomes enclosure. Names become walls. Symbols become idols. Distinction becomes separation. A sword, an arrow—discernment measures action, current position, now in relation to course, to the Path. In all the meanderings—with, to the left, to the right, to-and-fro. Each correction, each choice, a reorientation to Center. The pain of division is the price, the consequence of adventure, deviation, misapprehension, the entry into the crucible of who, what, where, when, why. Because! To forget, to remember, and to forget again. The wall, the Oak, the Mountain was never the World. The Daughter, the extension, full expression of the Mother—the womb wherein ALL is begotten, and to which All will return. Manifestation is required for forgetting, where remembrance can occur, wherein the possibility to Rejoice, to imbibe, to leap into the abyss, to celebrate diversity as a celebration of Unity. In this, the Kingdom, all is fulfilled, all is realized, all is resolved. “But if you know what life is worth You would look for yours on Earth And now you see the light You gotta stand up”…. Stoop not down, Rise up, Rise with the rapture of being, Rise with love of diversity, Rise with courage in your heart, Rise with the Dawn, Rise with the Sun at the heart of Soul.
  • Per user request, here is a place to discuss dream interpretation.

    2 8
    2 Topics
    8 Posts
    A
    I saw a short video how in Hinduism there is a teaching that the last thing you think when you die determines how you will reincarnate. Then he said that sleeping is a rehearsal for death, so that every night before you go to sleep to mind your thoughts. I didn’t get what he recommended what you think. I decided to think about all the love I have not only with my partner; but everyone, all my friends, and all my temple members. This was a wonderful practice I will continue.
  • Q&A and discussion on the Path of Initiation

    331 4k
    331 Topics
    4k Posts
    augurA
    Presented with options, we turn away from the Divine every day in large ways and small ways, in conscious ways and unconscious ways. Accumulatively, if the choice is to errantly associate gratification of the “self” with Truth, the path tends toward “Black.” Rectifications of direction—intent—are entirely feasible where the Right Relationship with Self is established and the path corrected. The weight of change, tendency, habits, baseness—is a lot to overcome. If there were an “Ultimate Choice,” to be a “Black Brother,” I am not sure how it could/would be unmade. If it could be unmade, it was never the true choice.
  • Q&A and discussion on the world view encapsulating humanity's current stage of evolution

    952 13k
    952 Topics
    13k Posts
    christianbryantC
    93 I am not in the business of re-mixes or reprints when it comes to the work of Uncle Al. In fact, I am certainly focused these days on tools that aid the serious ceremonial magician in documenting and publishing their own works. However, in the course of research into TeX and LaTeX for the typesetting of occult works I ran into a "re-mix" titled "Invoke Often" by Alessia Helsdottir with whom I am not familiar. At first glance it seems like a passionate attempt to organize Class D documents into a convenient publication useful for both students and seasoned magicians. I have not had the opportunity to critically review the work, however. Having done this myself for personal use only using Scans from the Equinox, I certainly understand the intent. Seeing the document for sale on Amazon and Lulu, for me at least, does pose a problem, as does the licensing of it as Creative Commons. My question to the forum is two-fold. 1) Is anyone familiar with this document and has it been of use? 2) From the GitHub link the creator invites others to aid in correcting the content as found wanting. For me, I would see this as an opportunity only to apply Libri templates I have been experimenting with to bring the document into a shape befitting the work and its purpose. My gut says to let it be and not take on any ownership of new versions (especially as doing so would require thorough examination of the content and any non-Crowley references within it, as well as potentially opening the door for additional documents similar in scope). I would love to hear thoughts from folks here. 93 93/93
  • Q&A and discussion on the Hermetic Qabbalah

    541 5k
    541 Topics
    5k Posts
    christianbryantC
    93 The swap is often contrasted against Jewish Kabbalah and the Jewish tradition of gematria. There is a technical logic to Crowley’s swap, but it is mostly Thelemic / Golden Dawn tarot-system logic, not a clean Hebrew-gematria or Jewish-kabbalistic logic. Crowley’s own stated move is clear: the line in Liber AL says “Tzaddi is not the Star,” and in the New Comment he resolves it by saying Tzaddi is The Emperor, and Heh is The Star; therefore Aries and Aquarius are counterchanged, producing what he calls “perfectly, flawlessly symmetrical” tarot attributions. [1] In Book of Thoth, he implements that literally: The Emperor is assigned to Tzaddi and Aries, while The Star is assigned to Heh and Aquarius. [2] The problem is that this does not preserve the older Hebrew-letter astrology found in Sefer Yetzirah. In the Sefaria text, the twelve simple letters are tied to the zodiac, with Heh forming Aries and Tzadi forming Aquarius. [3] That same structure is echoed in Crowley’s own 777 table before the swap: Heh = 5 = Aries = tarot IV, and Tzaddi = 90/900 = Aquarius = tarot XVII. [4] So from the standpoint of Hebrew alphabet order and classical letter-zodiac attribution, the old system is actually cleaner. Where Crowley’s move becomes “mathematical” is not gematria in the usual Jewish sense, but symmetry of tarot/zodiac geometry. He compares the Emperor/Star swap to the earlier Strength/Justice swap: Leo and Libra rotate around Virgo; Aries and Aquarius rotate around Pisces. His wording is explicit: Aries and Aquarius flank Pisces, just as Leo and Libra flank Virgo. [5] In other words, he is treating the zodiac as a loop and introducing a second “twist” to balance the first one. That is elegant inside his tarot architecture, a bit like making the graph prettier after discovering one edge is crossed. But as gematria, it is weak. Heh has the value 5; Tzaddi has 90 or final 900 in Crowley’s own table. [6] The Emperor is IV, The Star is XVII. There is no obvious Hebrew numerical equation where 5 or 90 “proves” Emperor or Star. In fact, before the swap, the ordinal structure is elegant: Fool = 0, Magus = I, Empress = III, Emperor = IV, so Heh, the 5th Hebrew letter, naturally falls on the 5th trump if the Fool is counted as zero. Likewise Tzaddi, the 18th letter, naturally falls on Trump XVII as the 18th trump. Crowley’s swap breaks that. There is one cute gematric coincidence, though: the Hebrew zodiac names for Aries and Aquarius both total 44 in standard gematria. Aries, טלה, is 9 + 30 + 5 = 44; Aquarius, דלי, is 4 + 30 + 10 = 44. Crowley’s own table gives these Hebrew sign spellings and the component letter values. [6] That makes Aries/Aquarius a surprisingly “legal-looking” pair to exchange at the level of sign-names. But that is a supporting curiosity, not a derivation. It does not explain why Tzaddi, specifically, should become Aries. From a Jewish mystical standpoint, the swap is hard to defend as traditional Kabbalah. Sefaria’s Sefer Yetzirah material gives the basic letter-zodiac map, and Rabbeinu Bahya also describes the 22 Hebrew letters as corresponding to wind/water/fire, the seven fixed stars/planets, and the 12 zodiac signs. [7] None of that requires tarot, and none of it suggests swapping Heh and Tzaddi. So if the test is “does this preserve Hebrew/Kabbalistic letter attribution?” the answer is no. Crowley’s swap is important and logical within Crowley’s initiatory tarot system, because it makes the Thoth deck’s symbolic architecture line up with his reading of Liber AL and with his desired zodiacal symmetry. But it is not logically compelled by Hebrew gematria or classical Jewish mysticism. It is a deliberate Thelemic override of the older Sefer Yetzirah-style correspondences — elegant as occult engineering, but not “kosher” as Hebrew-letter tradition. Crowley’s stated reason is this: Liber AL forced him to re-examine the inherited Golden Dawn tarot attributions. In Book of Thoth, he says the phrase “Tzaddi is not the Star” answered his own mental doubt about whether the old attributions were right. He says he tried for years to solve the problem, and only much later saw that The Star must be exchanged with The Emperor. The New Comment gives the same solution: Tzaddi = Emperor, Heh = Star, with Aries and Aquarius counterchanged. [8] The strongest technical reason he gives is zodiacal symmetry. Crowley says the earlier Golden Dawn correction had already swapped Justice and Strength, producing a balanced rotation around Virgo: Leo and Libra on either side of Virgo. His Emperor/Star swap creates a matching symmetry around Pisces: Aries and Aquarius on either side of Pisces. So the “why” is not primarily gematria; it is a structural correction to the zodiacal sequence of the tarot trumps. [9] The more interesting clue is that the command “Tzaddi is not the Star” appears in Liber AL immediately after language about the “law of the fortress” and the “House of God.” Crowley identifies the House of God with the Tower, Atu XVI, and in Book of Thoth he explicitly connects the Tower card to that verse. That matters because the Tower is Mars, while the Emperor is Aries, a Mars-ruled sign. So the hidden trail may run: House of God / Tower / Mars → Aries → Emperor, rather than simply “Star is wrong, swap two labels.” That is an inference, but it is a pretty strong one inside Crowley’s own symbolic map. [10] Crowley also gives a symbolic reason for why The Star becomes Heh. In Book of Thoth, The Star is Nuit, the Lady of the Stars, pouring from two vessels; he links the imagery to the Great Mother, Binah, the Sea, and Babalon as a materialization of Nuit. Elsewhere in the same chapter, he says it is natural for the Great Mother to be attributed to Heh, because Heh is “her letter” in Tetragrammaton. That is probably the most coherent internal reason for removing Heh from the Emperor and giving it to the Star. [11] For the opposite half, Crowley tries to justify why The Emperor becomes Tzaddi by phonetics and rulership imagery. In Book of Thoth, the Emperor is Aries, fiery authority, paternal creative force, and power descending from Chokmah to Tiphareth. He then says the sound-root TZ / TS appears in words of rulership such as Tsar, Czar, Caesar, Senior, Seigneur, Signor, and Sir. This is not traditional Hebrew gematria; it is Crowley’s comparative-philological occult wordplay. But within his system, it gives Tzaddi a “ruler” flavor rather than an “Aquarian Star” flavor. [12] There is also a striking breadcrumb in Book of Lies. In the commentary to “Ninety-One,” Crowley says 90 is the number of Tzaddi, and then describes “the Star” in its exoteric sense as the naked woman by the stream. That is fascinating because it suggests he already regarded the Tzaddi-Star attribution as a surface-level or outward meaning, not necessarily the final secret one. It is not the full solution, but it is exactly the kind of sideways hint one would expect from Crowley. [13] A second possible hidden clue appears in Liber Arcanorum. In the stanza numbered 4, corresponding to the Emperor position, Crowley writes of dominion being established in the “Star of the Flame.” That does not explicitly say “Tzaddi is the Emperor,” but it does entangle Emperor-number symbolism, dominion, star imagery, and fire/Horus imagery before the later Book of Thoth exposition. The stanza for 17, the Star position, also makes the “holy virgin” undergo a fiery transformation rather than presenting the Star as merely passive or watery. [14] But the cross-referencing also reveals a real problem. In Crowley’s older 777-style tables, the pre-swap system is clean: Heh = Aries = Emperor, and Tzaddi = Aquarius = Star. The Tree of Life paths also fit that older arrangement: the Aries/Emperor path joins Chokmah to Tiphareth, while the Aquarius/Star path joins Netzach to Yesod. Yet in Book of Thoth, after the swap, Crowley still describes the Emperor’s authority as descending from Chokmah to Tiphareth — the old Heh/Aries/Emperor path. So the swap is not a simple “put Emperor onto Tzaddi’s old Tree path.” It is more like Crowley is correcting the tarot-letter keys while preserving zodiacal and Tree-of-Life functions in a more complicated double register. [15] And there is one more complication from Liber Aleph: Crowley elsewhere says the “Letter of the Man” is Tzaddi, whose number is 90, and links it with Maim, water. That sounds much closer to the older Aquarius/man/water symbolism than to Aries/Emperor/fire. So across Crowley’s corpus, Tzaddi does not become purely “Emperor-like.” It retains older Aquarian and watery resonances even after the formal tarot correction. [16] Crowley’s real reason was not gematria. It was a Thelemic correction of tarot’s zodiacal architecture, triggered by Liber AL and solved through symmetry. The swap allowed him to make The Star into a more perfect image of Nuit / Heh / Great Mother, and The Emperor into Tzaddi / rulership / Aries / Horus-force. But the deeper one digs into his own symbolic tables, the more it looks like a deliberate esoteric override rather than a clean restoration of Hebrew-letter tradition. In other words: Crowley’s swap is internally meaningful, and (likely) not random. But it is “logical” in Crowley’s sense of symbolic Qabalah — poetic, geometrical, phonetic, initiatory — not in the stricter sense of Hebrew gematria or inherited Jewish letter astrology. In that is Thelema. Do What Thou Wilt, indeed. 93 93/93
  • Q&A and discussion on yoga and other avenues of mysticism

    514 5k
    514 Topics
    5k Posts
    D
    @Uni_Verse said "The Mystics' Rede (of I) four-square, mystic, I am a Nigh-hil-is-tic! Who can know nothing, there : being, no thing to know Though I dare O, my god ! I DO, DARE : TO WILL To feel, to think, to be-leaf When, said: "This is THAT," I recoils, horrified At the denial of my validity Sanctity of my solemn-I-ty Accepting, Respecting Beliefs Best I can do as a fellow Me to You TOOT, TOOT HOOT, HOOT" Reading this just brought Brightness of Laughter, pure-undiluted-solar-simple-Happiness, to start my day!
  • Q&A and discussion on ceremonial magick

    1k 14k
    1k Topics
    14k Posts
    S
    Also, I used an invocation from the Book of the Goddess: https://sacred-texts.com/wmn/bog/index.htm
  • Scriptural meditations of the day from the Thelemic canon, with primary emphasis on Liber LXV, Liber VII, and Liber CCXX. (Meditations with no responses after 2 days will be deleted - we want to encourage ACTIVE DISCUSSION.)

    916 3k
    916 Topics
    3k Posts
    S
    @Takamba said "When Volume II of the Equinox was supposed to come out, there was nothing for Crowley to offer (lack of money and whatnot plus maybe other things). Crowley dubbed Volume II of the Equinox "The Volume of Silence." What a pun! Anyway. He claimed in one writing or another to have taken it up as an A.'.A.'. tradition. I don't remember if it is supposed to be one year or five years of silence. I am suspecting that Jim has adopted this tradition and it is why we haven't heard from him in so long (this is all assumption at this point). Let's hope it's one year and not five." In addition to the Holy Books of Thelema, I would recommend Crowley's "Confessions" as required reading. Read "The Confessions of Aleister CrowleY" and "John St. John". (Not necessarily directed towards Takamba) Reading those two texts/books will integrate your brain with Crowley's thinking. I would say that such reading is more important than anything Abramelin ever wrote... Compare the Abramelin technique with what I suggested in my Psalms of an Aeon (stupid, ridiculous title) #20. It's all about increased devotion. Devotion is just thought, belief, dogma, rubbish. True devotion represents a diminishment of thought so that thought becomes one-pointed, and then through that one-pointedness the mind subsides and all that is left is awareness. HGA?
  • Led by Al-Shariyf, based Download a free copy of Liber Theta, https://thelema.org/publications#article--monographs

    188 1k
    188 Topics
    1k Posts
    A
    @danica said " @AliceKnewI said "I notice that the sun rays curve as if it were rotating widdershins - counterclockwise. Why would that be? I would have expected Deosil - "sunwise" Any insights for this?" this is how it appears the Zodiac is moving on daily basis (diurnal Earth rotation), what we see from earth" Oh, thanks so much! 93 93/93