Goetic "Demons"
-
@Froclown said
"anything that has properties, qualities, etc, that distinguish it from something else, is a physical thing."
You seem to be oblivious that your ideas are counter to those you've supposedly mastered. By embracing a materialist, scientific, evolutionary belief system, you have rejected the basic premise of Thelema and every other related system from which it draws. Mind is not the product of evolution of physical structures: you've completely missed the fact that experience of awareness is invisible nothingness, totally indescribable by words. Try to find the beginning of your mind. You can't. It does not begin with physical anything. Before Malkuth comes Kether and not the reverse. And before that are nothing, no limit and limitless light. The fact that "limitless light" is at the very top and veiled by no limit and nothing assures us that it is beyond physicality and therefore not the oridinary kind of "light" we might think of by our everyday use of the word.
-
Let me pose some questions.
Is it conceivable that a Computer can run a simulation of the world?
Is that computer simulation actual trees, planets, suns, water, human beings etc. Or is it merely a model of them made out of computer hardware and software?
IS the fact that the computer world is an illusion, evidence that the computer itself is an illusion, or is the computer the REAL thing which creates the illusion of the simulated world?
Now a citizen of this simulated world, has no access to the computer hardware, but he is aware of the simulated objects.
These simulated objects seem real to this simulated man.
Is it not the case that if this man traces back these simulation to their source he finds the seem comes to that void you speak of. Even he originates in that void.
Now, is not the actual computer hardware that which houses the void as well as the simulated reality. And the simulated mans is actually a component of that computer?
Now replace compute with physical brain, and simulated reality with the actual seemingly physical reality we see and touch.
We live in simulations created by the brain, I am a simulation of the brain, and can only trace those seemingly physical things back to the void. But the brain is the actually physical reality that which creates all the seeming physical objects. The brain creates these from actually interacting with actual objects.
Thus our world is a simulation of actual physical objects. The gap between the actual and the seeming is the abyss. And the seeming can take on different forms, that represent different aspects of the actual.
A moving stream of water or a river dragon spirit, are twe different ways of seeming, but the actual River is the same actual thing.
-
Wrong direction.
For your proposition to be correct, you'd have to start out with the premise that a computer can run a very limited simulation of the world and that the simulation was put into computer form by intelligence. Then, you'd be right. Why? Because the intelligence would form the physical properties out of energy which spontaneously arises from the limitless light which make up silicon, petroleum-based plastics, etc. which go into the creation of a working computer. THEN, after the mind has fabricated a "reality" out of its own limitless (and therefore non-physical) substance, the mind can begin to project a very limited relative awareness of the world into the computer.
BTW, what you are trying to state has already been stated in Buddhism.
It is the Sambogakaya. It is the energy (reflection) of the "mirror."The problem (for you) is that nothing is a real thing since everything is interdependent and in flux and time is illusory. So, freezing a "thing" in time might lead to a convincing thought process about thing-ness, but the fact is that this is just a symbol of how relative ideas could be. Probability. Symbol. Sambogakaya. Not thing-ness. Thingness does get expressed in the relative dimension of time, however, which is what you're hung up on. But, it does not create the Creator in the ultimate sense. It modifies IT in the relative sense.
However, since ultimately time doesn't exist, you could say any possibility exists. Because it does. (That would include time, so there is a paradox). But that doesn't make the underlying essence "physical." Except that it becomes as such given the right circumstances. And those circumstances are created by experience.... in the MIND/SPIRIT. That is why the void is not empty in a literal sense, but pregnant with potential.
-
you fail to realize that the world out there is not created by you, you are a creation of the world. not by intelligent design, not out of "energy" but out of actual stuff, that happens to come together in a way that processes and stores information.
The same world is there before and ofter you as one arrangement of substances happen to persist. You were born and will die a physical being. Just as a whirl pool is the water, it comes to be and fades away, but the water is water before during and after.
The world of sense is a model created in that brain.
Energy= potential to do work
Work = Mass moved through a distance.
E = Mc^2
Thus Energy is a physical entity, and it is dependent upon mass (substance) as well as space and time.
you fail to realize that not just any random though becomes a tangible object, this is because only when an actual object that exists in its own right makes an impression on us does it manifest.
-
@Redd Fezz said
"And so, the physical is dependent on the spiritual moreso than the spiritual is dependent on the physical. A fully awakened being is not limited by any physical aspect whatsoever and will arise anywhere and in multiple places simultaneously which present the appropriate conditions. These conditions also are more spiritual than physical, as they are linked to causes and their manifestation is the effect. This is why there is a devotional aspect to all religious practices. We are creating the causes for a desired effect."
Couldn't have said it that nicely myself. It's how I instantly thought about quantum physics/probabilistic causality when I began to understand what physicists meant by it.
-
@Froclown said
"you fail to realize that the world out there is not created by you, you are a creation of the world. not by intelligent design, not out of "energy" but out of actual stuff, that happens to come together in a way that processes and stores information.
The same world is there before and ofter you as one arrangement of substances happen to persist. You were born and will die a physical being. Just as a whirl pool is the water, it comes to be and fades away, but the water is water before during and after.
The world of sense is a model created in that brain.
Energy= potential to do work
Work = Mass moved through a distance.
E = Mc^2
Thus Energy is a physical entity, and it is dependent upon mass (substance) as well as space and time.
you fail to realize that not just any random though becomes a tangible object, this is because only when an actual object that exists in its own right makes an impression on us does it manifest."
And you fail to realize that energy/matter represented in E-Mc^2 is magically created from non-physical substance, and so that Source is not physical energy/matter. Thus, the Qabalistic symbolism of a "fountain of extreme and infinite pressure" projecting down through Kether and overflowing down to Malkuth. Were IT physical, IT would be limited, but IT is beyond nothing and limitless. So, IT becomes energy as we know it, but IT is not limited to energy/matter and has ITS origins beyond your scope of categorization. IT is called the "clear light" in/from which the essences of the elements naturally radiate and which eventually become actual light, energy and matter. Realization of IT leads to the Rainbow Body, the Body of Light, Subtle Body, Diamond/Vajra Body, etc.
The Body of Light leads me to my next point: You also fail to realize the world IS, literally, created by me and I am not actually the physical limitation you are communicating with. That is not to say that I am a "soul" because the concept of a soul is flawed in that it is defined as an eternal something, when in fact I am constantly in the process of death and rebirth, the continuation of which is Life. IT is not an "essence" of anything since IT can only be described as lack of essence (well, okay, IT could be described as the "essence" of awareness, Life, etc.), and since IT is nothing IT has the potential to be anything and everything, which is what makes IT "radiant awareness" or "full emptiness" or "pregnant with potential." Sunyata is not exhausted in relativity. This is expressed in Qabalah as a sphere, in Buddhism as "the crystal." If a crystal ball is put on a red fabric, it becomes the color red. IT is also expressed as the mirror, which reflects (takes on the appearance) of its surroundings. But, these metaphors are incomplete as the mirror is everywhere, the crystal is everything. Thus, again, the Qabalistic symbolism of the eternal fountainhead pressing down through Kether. Again, the symbolism of the mirror: luminous clarity, reflective energy, and the physical surface. Again, the symbolism of the crystal: not only does it "absorb" the colors of its environment, but as light passes through, a crystal splits the light and projects rainbow colors both within itself and to the outside environment. So, too, the mind receives, absorbs, reflects and projects. From where does it draw this "light"? This is a quality of the luminous clarity of Mind: it naturally dances with this energy of reflection and projection. This is the infinite fountainhead. This is why the Tree is shown upside-down with its roots in Kether and why the "ray of creation" begins at the top: it streams forth effortlessly from "Above", or beyond physicality, to the crystallization of "Below". Your interpretation is backwards and is simply the relative mind, dancing with a flicker of the Light, looking back at the gaping maw which puked him out and continually threatens to eat him (and does). This movement of life exhausts physicality by burning it up one calorie at a time and converting it into other life processes which also die in each moment, birthing new life. Sakyamuni Buddha explained it with a succession of candles burning out as the original flame from the first candle is passed on to the next and to the next straight on down the line: at the end, the previous candles are gone, the flame is different, but it is also the same. This is the movement of life which kills to create just as the movement of a mirror's reflection is what distinguishes it from being a mere picture (dead symbol). The scientific supposition that energy cannot be created or destroyed does not rule out spirit being the controlling factor in all things, but of course science is not looking there.
All of these religious symbols and metaphors are "fingers pointing to the moon." That moon can be reflected into a million cups of water infinitely and the moon will never be exhausted no matter how many times it is duplicated and reflected in the water. This moon metaphor represents the effortless, inexhaustible radiance of IT. This brings to mind Crowley's Star Sponge vision... "Nothingness with twinkles."
You can't possibly have crossed the Abyss if you're still oblivious to the fact that intelligent design has nothing to do with theism and everything to do with the Nature of Mind. As the famous Zen koan goes, "Who is the master that makes the grass green?" Who is the All-Creating-King of the atheist Mahayana Buddhism, Samantabhadra? If we do not create the world, then who makes computers, builds houses, molds the environment to his will?
As I stated previously, science/philosophy/logic can't prove anything really exists, yet our experience persists. The only thing we know for sure is awareness of experience. It is everything else, we're not so sure about, including the experience itself. The formula of IHVH expresses this. A dream expresses this. And cause-effect relationships within waking life express this. Using Occam's Razor, then, if a demon appears and, after all scrutiny, appears to have actually caused a change in your reality, for example: two or more people saw the demon pick up a physical object and throw it against the opposite wall, breaking it in half, what is the simplest explanation? Days later, as you hold the broken object, you may rationalize that your friend tricked you or some sublimated mental powers caused this strange phenomenon which you can't explain, but the simplest explanation is that a demon threw it.
And how do you feel about Kant's Antinomies?
-
Yes Kabbalah was built around beliefs is Idealism, but that was thousands of years ago before psychology, cognitive science, neuroscience, computer technology, information theory, etc.
I change nothing from Kabbalah.
Kether - the thing in and of itself existing in the sea of Ayn Sof with many other things in and of themselves.
Chokmah - The point where the thing in itself enters the mind, where the stone hits the water.
Binah - The water itself smooth clear un-rippled reflection of the mind, pure understanding, the water in the cup of Babalon etc.
Abyss - The unorganized rippling in the waters of the mind.
Chesed - the through of the waves, also the quieting of them
Gevurah - the Crests of the waves, the active aspect of the mind.
Tiphereth - The balanced mind, the ripples begin to take order, beauty, the sun in plato.
Netzatch - ordering of the continuity analog aspects, affects, personalities, etc.
Hod - Breaking the analog up into discrete unites, quantities etc.
Yesod - balancing the analog continuous with the digital discrete into Forms as per plato.
Malkuth, the mixing of the forms to replicate the information of the ripples and produce perceived replicas of Objects and events in Space-time etc.
The known object in the minds perception at Malkuth, is a model, a replica of the actual but not yet known object (KETHER) in the Ayn Sof.
Binnah, is the totally cleared mind, receptive to the word of Chokmah, which is to say the sensory input of the external world.
The external physical world of space-time we see perceive is the way we model the separation between Kethers in the Ayn sof.
Kethers in Ayn Sof = Hadits in the body of Nuit.
The physical world as we see it is unreal, but it is an unreal reflection of the REAL the actual physical world.
-
Hmm... well, it hardly seems appropriate to label the "real" world with a term which is literally a label for limitation and delusion. In doing so, you run into this problem we've been hashing out. And it is senseless because...
Your admission that "not just any random thought" becomes a tangible object is proof that not everything is physical. Despite the infinite gulf between pure intelligence and matter, the operation of pure intelligence upon matter transcends the multifariousness of infinite microcosms, producing an absolute unity. This is "experience." And awareness of experience is all we can assert... and only this because it is undeniable, though inexplicable. Upon closer examination, experience of anything falls apart. You can't prove a "thing-in-itself". For a person who doesn't like fantasies, you're actually promoting the idea of God, the original "thing-in-itself."
You may claim that thoughts are nothing more than energy in our brains and thus reducible to energy/matter in this way, but there is an imponderable chasm here and no known explanation for why a brain would produce thinking, awareness, consciousness and the illusion of selfhood. Theoretically, you can sum it up as you have previously as the sum of relationships particular to a physical vessel, but this does not explain anything. It only describes it.
And this is the limit of scientific inquiry: it is only descriptive in minutiae using deductive logic, which, though ultimately incomplete, is used jointly with inductive logic to promote broad generalizations supposed from incomplete data. There is no difference between Occam's Razor of science and spirituality. As Crowley said, demons may not be literal things (because there is no such thing as a thing-in-itself, although you seem to be affirming just the opposite), but they sure behave as "real things," so it is best to treat them as such when the experience presents itself. So, when a demon materializes before your eyes, is it, in your opinion, a "real" or "physical" or not? If not, then what is it? Your imagination? How does your imagination have power over the physical dimension, magickally speaking, unless of course it is of a "higher order" than matter?
-
its appearance is something of a cognitive illusion.
Not an hallucination, but a projection of aspects of the mind to a physical phenomena.
When I see castles in the clouds, it is not that the clouds are made of stone, its that the process I described above with Kabbalah, gets mixed up a bit.
This is because perception is not fully passive. When the signal is unclear we fill in the gaps with forms of things we have seem before or have familiarity with.
The demon is really a creation of a medium which the mind uses as a feed back mechanism. A mirror is a feed back to of the face, by looking in the mirror we can apply things to the face, better that if we try to do it without one.
the spirit medium is a sort of mirror that reflects aspects of the mind, including archetypes in the Jungian sense, that are hardwired in the brain genetically, and not normally cast into awareness.
The brain is very complex and has all kids of features that we can't have awareness of, the same way we can't see our face. but the spirit like the mirror makes these aware to us, in a symbolic way.
Even when you speak of the spirit of a thing like Christmas or a River Spirit, its a combination of the event and its meaning to you, its connection with other ideas, visceral reactions, affect, etc
So a Dragon Kami does not really live in the river, is is a union of the river and its impact on your psyche. Just as the Ancestors are nat really summoned from the dead, it is the spirit of the ancestor you call, the minds semantic network that relates to him. Regular devotion at the shrine helps to fortify this semantic link with the ancestors name, which is necessary to summon him up.
One can summon up Bugs Bunny, as an archetype as easily as Zeus or Bacchus, Even Christians invoke the holy spirit, which they may or may not think of as a non-physical being. Generally its thought of as a shared attitude of kindness and brotherhood, not some sort of "energy" or non-physical thing that infects them. Well the ones that fall on the ground and twitch think they are infected, but thats called hypnosis and not wanting to disappoint peers and authority.
-
And you've conveniently ignored thing-in-itself and demons throwing physical objects.
The Greek origin of the word "personality" reflects the idea of Spirit projecting through the human mechanism/mask. It is not that personality originates within our complex human brains, but that our human brains are relative (and simplistic) waystations through which Spirit manifests in symbolism relevant to our experience. Spirits are not "personified" by human dipshits. Spirit has the quality of persona to begin with which is expressed all around us in the material realm.
Continual reference to jack frost, the easter bunny or the christmas spirit do nothing to improve your argument, btw.
-
Ideas do not just float around disembodied in a timeless void and them just from time to time crystallize into actual things, with physical forms.
Actual physical substances to float about is actual space-time, they each have unique properties which interact and form complex systems of things, which include human brain.
Then later those human brains and bodies, come into contact with other things and the things cause the bodies to react is different ways physically. One such way the body reacts is by building models in the brain, from chemical signals and neuron structures, that represent the objects in encounters.
The idea or spirit is in the brain. the only REAL thing is the substance itself.
Brains create ideas, Ideas do not exist on their own, and thus can not create matter to cloth themselves inside of.
Existence precedes Essence.
-
@Froclown said
"Ideas do not just float around disembodied in a timeless void and them just from time to time crystallize into actual things, with physical forms. "
Fully realized beings are not conditioned by time and space. Nirmanakaya is the intentional physical emanation of such a being who communicates Truth with silence. Any words such a being uses will be only words, which read from a book are basically the same as any other realized being and though communicating Truth, these words often fail to have the effect of the master's silence, which proves that Truth is not a condition of dead letters and "things," but of an essence which is received from mind-to-mind. If you want to call this essence "physical" I suppose it's fine with me, but it's kind of dumb since any scientist would whip out his electrospectrometer and tell you no energy transference has occured. This spirtual component of reality is also evident in the wang and lung transmissions, initiation ceremonies and the representation of Spirit as "clear light" consistently throughout all major cultural religious institutions.
The real Teacher is the Mind, for sure, but not the relative mind of the brain. In fact, when Truth is communicated to the relative mind, the experience is impossible to put into relative terms because it is beyond physical limitation and language is a representation of physical limitation. Speech in the sambogakaya / archetypal sense is the language with which Truth is communicated. Put it into a book and all you have are a bunch of symbols that a guy like you comes along and pokes fun of. Ever read The Cloud Upon The Sanctuary?
@Froclown said
"Actual physical substances to float about is actual space-time, they each have unique properties which interact and form complex systems of things, which include human brain. "
Elements. Dakini energy. Etc. We disagree on where this stuff originates. Nothing has changed there. And the use of a more modern term like "archetype" does nothing to scientifically sanitize the Wisdom Display of the Primordial State, which is Persona before it becomes personified into human beings' brains. I like the term archetype, too. The physical realm is the symbolic language Spirit manifests from previous causes. By observation, the real nature unfolds and the physical dimension points back to the unseen spiritual realm. Everything is like a trail of breadcrumbs. The secret "agent" (force) is the literally the secret agent (detective) examining the delusion looking for the Truth, oblivious to the fact that it is looking for itself, Spirit. IT is the only force at work in the universe. The metaphor is hunting for the elephant by following its tracks in the jungle when eventually you discover its tracks lead back to your home, where the elephant has been all along.
@Froclown said
"Then later those human brains and bodies, come into contact with other things and the things cause the bodies to react is different ways physically. One such way the body reacts is by building models in the brain, from chemical signals and neuron structures, that represent the objects in encounters."
And none of this disproves the existence of Spirit in the slightest nor the power of Spirit over matter. Way to go in circles. What do you make of The Devil card which blatantly represents this delusion you are espousing so adamantly?
@Froclown said
"The idea or spirit is in the brain. the only REAL thing is the substance itself.
Brains create ideas, Ideas do not exist on their own, and thus can not create matter to cloth themselves inside of.
Existence precedes Essence."
Repetition is the key to making your dreams a reality.
I must have missed the part where you went beyond the Antinomies of Kant in your "proof."
-
Show me evidence of one of these "fully realized beings" that can vanish into thin air, shape-shift, read thoughts, possess others bodies, and teleport all over the globe at will.
Unless you can produce such a person or creature, I will have to assume you are engaging in speculative crypto-zoology.
-
@Froclown said
"Show me evidence of one of these "fully realized beings" that can vanish into thin air, shape-shift, read thoughts, possess others bodies, and teleport all over the globe at will.
Unless you can produce such a person or creature, I will have to assume you are engaging in speculative crypto-zoology."
Aha, so there's the proof I was waiting for. Enjoy your armchair.
Might want to put the Lazyboy on "vibrate," though, since after all this effort, you still missed the whole "seeing is believing" debate regarding experiential data.
-
I believe I claimed to have crossed tho abyss That is to have traced back the process by which by brain takes raw sense data and constructs the phenomenas perceptions, to its origin and then took the leap to the source of that raw sense data.
I never claimed I was a being with the kind of powers you seem to think come with transcending the gap between the signifier and the signified, ie between the symbol and what it stands for.
Read Liber OS Abysmi vel Daath.
All I claim is to have undergone this practice successfully.
-
Seeing is doubting.
"trust not the human eye is sunlight or in shade, the shadow show of sight and sense in the devils masquerade"
It explains allot that you have not yet learned to thoughrally distrust your senses. Unless the evidence of the senses can be backed up by scientific observation in a controlled experiment and those experiments repeated with similar results by others, then one must assume all sense to be hallucination and all thought delusion. Thats simple skepticism.
-
Maybe you'll respect Jim's word, maybe not. I see elsewhere you've freely expressed how wrong he is about things and, if I'm not mistaken, I believe I saw a thread where you said you were the "head" of some "A.'.A.'.", so I have no idea what your deal is, but I believe Jim once described it to me as "magick you can reach out and touch." The point of this work is not necessarily to have these sorts of experiences, but they are experiences people have attested to repeatedly. As for myself, I have had such experiences and, no, there weren't any drugs involved.
Of course, you can rationalize this any way you like. But, as science and philosophy prove regarding experiential data: all you know is that you experience something and when enough people experience something it becomes status quo and accepted as factual enough to take for granted until the light of new evidence proves otherwise. But, magick, by its very nature, doesn't work that way (except, of course, in cases of like-minded magicians). And, yes, you're right: simple skepticism (emphasis on "simple"). You seem oblivious, again, to the fact that scientific method is no more than observation of experiential data and, therefore, relies on the senses. A microscope is just an extension of eyesight. You don't doubt your senses which tell you things are "physical," so your accusation is pretty hypocritical.
Since these sort of "super-normal" events happen as a result of individual causes and conditions, it takes a bit of work before results appear. And, typically, such beings don't make public displays too often, although we do have written records of such accounts and the lineage of transmission and method of practice still exist to this day. Among Tibetan Buddhists, such things are said to happen all the time, but nothing changes, even among Tibetan people who are disbelievers. It doesn't shake up the status quo to see a lama flying through the air every once in a while.
-
Well you have shown that we all have the capacity for the same sort of hallucinations and delusions, and perhaps a method by which such common illusions and cognitive tricks or misfirings can occur.
But it order to be taken seriously you should be able to produce these effects in controlled situations and provide tangible evidence for what you say.
anyone can say they bend spoons, may even believe it themselves if they whip themselves up into a state about it. But unless one can bend the spoon without touching it, in a situation where tricks ar slight of hand are ruled out, there is no evidence.
I claim to run, because I was put in charge of, a Second life simulation of the A.'.A.'. which I attempt to use all the source material the actual A.'.A.'. uses to the best of my ability to reconstruct the system, and fill in the gaps with some materials, rituals, and such that have worked for me, as voluntary alternatives.
I was never officially in the A.'.A.'. or the OTO nor any other Thelemic group, I did most of my work on my own, from Crowley's libers, Peter Carroll's Kaos magick, a great amount of Robert Anton Wilson, some Lovecraftian necronomican, a few dealings with neo-pagans, Buddhism, Taoism, etc.
Also the whole cannon of western Philosophy and the semanto-pathic systems of Discordianism and post-moderism in general.
Also physics/achemy from techo brache to bruno, Newton to Shrodinger.
-
sorry I am what you call an INTP
Arguments from title or claimed authority hold little watter with me, unless you can back up your claims with scientific evidence, they best you can get is a maybe. If your statements contradict existing evidence, then I will not accept them without strong support or showing known evidence to be wrong in some way, with strong evidence.
The strength of your conviction says nothing about how correct you are.
"Convictions cause convicts
Can you chart the path to captain Valentines sweet heart"