Builders of the Adytum
-
You could just write to BOTA and actually pay for it.
-
@Dannerz said
"Is it possible to get copies of those correspondences online the same way you can get some old tomes on .PDFs?"
Not legally
And I discourage acquiring them en masse (aside from the fact that BOTA deserves to be paid their modest monthly dues for them) because the lessons are well-paced so that you spend a certain amount of time on each. This gives time for subconsciousness to process them and integrate the information. (This is a pretty big deal, but it's hard to make it sound all that important unless you've done this sort of coursework before.)
-
@Jim Eshelman said
"
@Dannerz said
"Is it possible to get copies of those correspondences online the same way you can get some old tomes on .PDFs?"Not legally
"I once ran across one segment of the BOTA lessons advertised for sale -- but the asking price was far more than it would have cost to join BOTA and obtain the lessons legitimately!
You can get a flavor of the BOTA approach to Tarot from reading Jason Lotterhand's Thursday Night Tarot, and of Case's approach to Qabalah from the endnotes in his Book of Tokens. Both books repay careful study.
-
If one has already embraced Thelema, read and studied beyond the required student syllabus books, and is working with the Thoth tarot yet is too far from a TOT and the only resort to training and serious practice is the BOTA outer order, do you recommend taking this path knowing certain things like attributions of certain Tarot cards are wrong. Also, I've seen mentioned BOTA and the "Age of Aqaurius" so I understand they have not accepted the Age of Horus. I was wondering if this would interfere in any way with my Thelemic path if I took the outer order correspondence lessons. I have a Christian background (early upbringing) so that aspect does not inhibit me. But I certainly do not want to give up the LBRP, Gematria, Yoga or celebration of the Thelemic Holy Season.
-
@Nudor said
"If one has already embraced Thelema, read and studied beyond the required student syllabus books, and is working with the Thoth tarot yet is too far from a TOT and the only resort to training and serious practice is the BOTA outer order, do you recommend taking this path knowing certain things like attributions of certain Tarot cards are wrong."
This kind of “speaks to my condition”, as the Quakers say. Although I have not “embraced Thelema” nor studied it as deeply as you, I want to continue exploring its ideas and enjoy the discussion here. At the same time, I am hungry for “live” contact with people of a seriously esoteric turn of mind.
Reading the discussion of BOTA here, I explored pertinent websites and was pleased to discover a BOTA temple within an hour of where I live. I gather a New Zealander back in the 1960s, having been involved with the GD, made contact with PFC’s heir, Ann Davies. She visited New Zealand about 1965 and approved the setting up of a local chapter.
They naturally asked me how I’d discovered BOTA and I said I knew the name and a bit of basic information from long ago, but had most recently seen it discussed in “an online forum”. This week one of them put me on the spot and asked “which forum?” I said “you’ll probably tell me to wash my mouth out, but they’re Thelemites.” I got a distinctly frosty reaction and was advised that it would be better not to talk about it with BOTAns [?] present
Nevertheless there’s a lot of “common ground” between me and them and it’s refreshing to attend their services. I haven’t made it to one of their Tuesday Ann Davies lecture series yet; other things keep interfering. Maybe there is a higher influence trying to keep me away (or testing my resolve)
The sermon at the first service I attended happened to be on the subject of Abel [Havel] and was illustrated, naturally, by the Tarot “keys” Heh (V, Emperor), Beth (I, Magician) and Lamedh (XI, Justice). The differences couldn’t have been accented more immediately if they’d deliberately planned it!
I’m also a little disoriented by their invoking the Archangels of the four quarters on a Northern Hemisphere pattern; as I said in a discussion here on Liber Resh, I feel more comfortable with Fire and Michael in the North.
For the present, I can, for the sake of the congenial and mind-stretching discussion, indulge in a little “doublethink”; at least I think I can. Maybe I am just a dabbler
I’d better settle to one Path soon, or it may be too late for my present incarnation."Also, I've seen mentioned BOTA and the "Age of Aquarius" so I understand they have not accepted the Age of Horus… "
Did Horus supplant Aquarius? I see the successions Osiris -> Horus and Pisces -> Aquarius as two different things.
One odd seeming link between Thelema and BOTA nags at me:
In AL II,7:Hadit says: "I am the Axle of the Wheel and the Cube in the Circle"http://www.2000biz.com/pfc/images/botacube.gif
The way the circle is drawn here, it’s very reminiscent of the Waite/PFC Wheel [Atu X]; “BOTA” is not far from “ROTA” [2/200], Sulphur, Salt and Mercury are in both figures, and there is the Cube as I have always imagined it from the Hadit verse, with its longest diagonal as the “axle”.
It’s unlikely that PFC (or whoever devised that badge) was citing AL, and the reverse is chronologically impossible. Were they both drawing on some older cube-in-circle/wheel tradition?
OP
-
Lately, I have been reading about Enochian magick and I must admit some kind of morbid fascination with PFC's "rejection" of the Enochian techniques from BOTA's curriculum. What is the reason for this?
I have read conflicting reports about the "dangers" of Enochian magick and also (from the far side) of how Enochian magick is going to be employed by the Antichrist from St. John's Revelation to bring about global apocalypse. Is this the reason for it's exclusion from the BOTA curriculum given, as stated above, that BOTA is from a Gnostic Xtian standpoint? Or is what I've read a load of nonsense?
One more question: why would members of BOTA treat Thelema so sourly? Does this really come down to a mere disagreement of Tarot attributions gone horribly awry or are there more maleficent reasons for the divide between these schools of thought?
-
93 Spaceman.
Here is a previous discussion about Enochian magic and Builders of the adytum. It is under Enochophobia.
www.heruraha.net/viewtopic.php?t=469&start=0&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight= -
Ah, I appreciate it Ankh! I figured this had been discussed before but neglected to search, thanks!
-
@spaceman said
"Lately, I have been reading about Enochian magick and I must admit some kind of morbid fascination with PFC's "rejection" of the Enochian techniques from BOTA's curriculum. What is the reason for this?"
Case gave a number of reasons. (One perfectly practical consideration was that he didn't have a means - as he did with the Hebrew alphabet - to analyze the names derived from the Enochian tablets and understand what they really meant.) But I do think that the most compelling and primal one for him is that he felt that nothing holy could come from someone like Kelly; and, especially in response to the (to Case) morally repugnant alleged recommendation of the Enochian entities that Dee and Kelly sometimes share their wives, everything that come from that source must be suspect at best, and most likely malginant.
"One more question: why would members of BOTA treat Thelema so sourly?"
Case was kinder and more respectful of Crowley than any of his official successors, but he was also quite firm that his students shouldn't attempt any of the practices Crowley recommended. This, in PFC's successors (especially Ann), got amplified into a demonization of Crowley. So some key people within BOTA down through the years, saying you're a Thelemite is synonymous with saying you're a black magician who favors wickedness for its own sake. They're kinda sensitive about that sort of thing.
-
@Jim Eshelman said
" But I do think that the most compelling and primal one for him is that he felt that nothing holy could come from someone like Kelly; and, especially in response to the (to Case) morally repugnant alleged recommendation of the Enochian entities that Dee and Kelly sometimes share their wives, everything that come from that source must be suspect at best, and most likely malginant.
"Ha, I was just reading something about Kelly himself also being suspicious if the motives of the Enochian entities, that they were often insulting to him.
It sounds as if Paul Foster Case was kind of uptight. Did he have sort of the puritanical sexual morals of an uptight Xtian englishman? Is the divide between Thelema and BOTA only a moral one though, I can't help but get the feeling that PFC's magickal experience led him to believe that Thelemites were screwing with things that people shouldn't be screwing with. Was it simply Enochian or was the Goetia bad news as well? Could it possibly have been because he felt Crowley's adaptations of GD material weren't valid?
-
It seems to me that there were periods of time when Kelly was deceiving Dee and that there were times when it appears that a valid communication is taking place.
I don't know if the wife swap communication was one or the other but I bet Kelly had a great deal more interest in swapping wives than Dee or the Angels did
I believe Case's attitude towards Enochian is one of the rare instances where he seems to be exhibiting irrationality..
Jim, I believe you are right about the death of his mentor ( and also one if his wives ) may have been the impetus of this reaction...
-
@Tony said
"It seems to me that there were periods of time when Kelly was deceiving Dee and that there were times when it appears that a valid communication is taking place.
I don't know if the wife swap communication was one or the other but I bet Kelly had a great deal more interest in swapping wives than Dee or the Angels did
"Perhaps it was God like telling Abraham to sacrifice his son; it was a genuine communication, but Dee was being "tested" and was supposed to resist the temptation
In his position and from accounts of Kelley's character, I would have been very wary of anything that didn't have unimpeachable evidence of "praeterhuman" origins. At least I hope I would have.
From the account in in Benjamin Woolley's biogreaphy, Dee seems to have been rather credulous at times.
OP