Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∴A∴
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

The Etz ha-Chayyim

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Qabbalah
4 Posts 3 Posters 199 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    FiliusBestia
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    93, As I go over the Tree, I find that I am labelling the Pillar of Mercy as Chaos in its purest sense, the Pillar of Severity as Order. Masculine and feminine, respectively. I also find myself thinking of Hod as a feminine, lower form of Chokmah; and Netzach as a lower, masculine form of Binah. Have any ya'll come up with this before?

    J F 3 Replies Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jim Eshelman
    replied to FiliusBestia on last edited by
    #2

    @FiliusBestia said

    "93, As I go over the Tree, I find that I am labelling the Pillar of Mercy as Chaos in its purest sense, the Pillar of Severity as Order. Masculine and feminine, respectively. I also find myself thinking of Hod as a feminine, lower form of Chokmah; and Netzach as a lower, masculine form of Binah. Have any ya'll come up with this before?"

    You'll have many thoughts about these things over the years, and they will change, supplement each other, rearrange by context, etc.

    But to give personal opinions, which you seem to be soliciting: Chaos/Order fits many of the characteristics of Chokmah/Binah specifically, but not the pillars themselves. (Chesed as Chaos is a real loser! - It's essential nature is primarily Order to the max.)

    Hod is "feminine" primarily in terms of containment, form, structure - it teaches that what we call "intellect" is the form or pattern, not what flows through it. And what flows through it, at root, is Chokmah. Make of that what you will in your own language.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frater SOL
    replied to FiliusBestia on last edited by
    #3

    @FiliusBestia said

    "I also find myself thinking of Hod as a feminine, lower form of Chokmah; and Netzach as a lower, masculine form of Binah."

    Compare to Crowley's statement concerning the same in Ch. 0 of Magick In Theory & Practice:

    In the number Seven the feminine nature is again predominant, but it is the masculine type of female, the Amazon, who is balanced in the number Eight by the feminine type of male.

    Fr. H.H.H.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    Jim Eshelman
    replied to FiliusBestia on last edited by
    #4

    @Fr. H.H.H. said

    "
    @FiliusBestia said
    "I also find myself thinking of Hod as a feminine, lower form of Chokmah; and Netzach as a lower, masculine form of Binah."

    Compare to Crowley's statement concerning the same in Ch. 0 of Magick In Theory & Practice:

    In the number Seven the feminine nature is again predominant, but it is the masculine type of female, the Amazon, who is balanced in the number Eight by the feminine type of male."

    That's expressed especially in the Magical Images of the Sephiroth.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups