Active Imagination
-
-
@kasper81 said
"Skrying in the spirit vision necessitates a banishing ritual and knowledge of Cabbalistic god names, angelic names and appropriate elemental pentagram banishings as a shield against hostile or deceptive beings."
No, those are one particular approach to skrying in the spirit vision. In fact, it's how I'd teach the subject. But don't confuse technique with the actuality. One can, for example, drive a car without having one's hands at the 2 and 10 o'clock positions of the stearing wheel.
"Travelling (astral projection i.e. projecting ourselves into a Tarot crad or hebrew letter) in the spirit vision also necessitates such protection but this is more 3D more interactive more "real" and vital as i said whereas Skrying is more observational and 2D."
It depends on definition. The term "skrying in the spirit vision" is used by Crowley and others interchangeably with "astral travel."
BTW, I've done this kind of journeying (in my naive early days) without banishing.
-
@kasper81 said
"ok so how would you define that Jungian technique AI?"
I'm doing my best not to describe it at all
- beyond the answer I first gave on this thread (which, I think, puts it exactly in right perspective). IOW it's either a process ONLY of imagination with psychological results, or it's an actual astral journeying. It depends (on the person, the situation, etc.).That is: It's not astral journeying unless it happens that it is.
-
With Jung, you're talking about a guy who was absolutely determined to frame what has always been considered "mystical experience" in the language of empirical science. So, Jung is intentionally placing those limitations and expectations on the techniques he decribes. After all, he wants to present a safe, sane practice for psychotherapy without any attached esoteric doctrine. Within that empirical framework, everything that is considered "real" astral travel by mystics would be labelled "active imagination" by doctrinally strict Jungians. But they wouldn't consider the results any less important to the individual. Jung presented it all as the same thing.
So, the distinction that some are trying to make here seems to miss the mark.
It seems like people are trying to separate "active imagination" from "astral travel" by using the distinction of personal unconscious versus collective unconscious.
It would be better, imho, to consider "active imagination" empirical science's broad, all-inclusive term for "astral travel" instead of trying to understand "active imagination" as referring only to the *personal unconscious *aspect of astral travel.
-
The idea that a highly charged symbol can be a “door” between the personal and collective subconscious is giving-me a lot to think. It seems to reveal something about the very structure of the mind. Maybe it can clarify others cases of “ astral communication” like telepathy, obsession and evocation.
-
Just for to sake of curiosity, I am finding some curious phenomenon involving active imagination and magick. Looking back at my diary I saw that very much of what I was getting, although highly personal, had striking connections with my magical practices at the moment
I was not aware that my subconscious was actually resonating with the forces I was calling. It answers a lot of questions once you see the “magick mirror” at work.
Thank you guys and thank you Jim.
-
So, just as a matter in interest, where did you get the 'Alien force' wording from?
So what would you do if you wanted to increase the strength of the muscle(if i may use that term) that receives the subconscious.(if i may use that term).
How would you become more sensitive to those subtle energies that are the very forces magick wishes to manifest?
Just wishing to throw a question at you/
Q
-
@Faus said
"Jim, is it Ok if I post a few pieces of the article so we can talk about it?"
You should certainly feel free to restate things in your own words, and to quote an occassional sentence or two.
-
O thanks, I will do that!
There are some points that I find very interesting and practical.
It seems that the two channels we naturally have with the subconscious are dreams and projections. Meditation and Magick would be the artificial channels we build to enhance the communication. It answers the question about strengthening the communication with the “alien dream maker”.
"The conscious mind doesn't have to know what a symbol means, for subconsciousness to read it directly, with full understanding."
This has changed the whole way that I look at symbols. Not as puzzles or codes hiding something but as sources of meaning themselves. I would even say that they are the forms of psychological forces.
Are there published instructions of how to explore this “telepathic world wide web” aspect of the subconscious or is these the kind of information that is classified?
-
@kasper81 said
" Cool. You mean an entity connection?"
Would not call an entity connection... unless entity connections feel the same. Is more like that strange sensation you get when wake up from a dream and almost can remember it, like something moving deep inside your mind (somehow stronger). The best signal that you moved the “astral light” is that it moves you.
In that moment, the vision almost rushes in the imagination once you sit and let it come.
@kasper81 said
"what is your procedure? LRBP then Supreme Ritual Of Element of path you are entering then physical Sign Of Enterer? Sign of silence?"
Usually I do not use procedures of magical systems that I am not initiated (GD or AA). But the basics are the same. Preparation, meditation, banishing and full invocation (for me, pentagrams alone are not enough to charge the vision).
Scrying and even active imagination are not things I do in a rush, five minutes before dinner. Unless I feel charged with the ritual, I do not even bother to try because I will only get “brain noise”.