Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∎A∎
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

100 hours to Practicus?!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Mysticism
4 Posts 2 Posters 336 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hermes
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    This is not a joke Nor a method to become a Practicus in 100 hours 😆

    I heard some say it takes about 100 hours of "meditation" to "charge"properly the energy body. By "meditation", it is meant at least "dhyana" i guess, as they(chinese) say most people will get minutes or even seconds only per hour of practice. Thus the need for many people to meditate everyday for 20 years or 5 years very seriously to get those 100 hours that grant the level i guess corresponds to Practicus in that regard, basically being ready to master kundalini.

    Does this seem to you some thing of good accuracy?!

    H J 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • H Hermes

      This is not a joke Nor a method to become a Practicus in 100 hours 😆

      I heard some say it takes about 100 hours of "meditation" to "charge"properly the energy body. By "meditation", it is meant at least "dhyana" i guess, as they(chinese) say most people will get minutes or even seconds only per hour of practice. Thus the need for many people to meditate everyday for 20 years or 5 years very seriously to get those 100 hours that grant the level i guess corresponds to Practicus in that regard, basically being ready to master kundalini.

      Does this seem to you some thing of good accuracy?!

      H Offline
      H Offline
      Hermes
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Or for those who will/prefer:

      If it does take 100 hours, it is 100 hours of what in your opinion? How to describe that, for instance major dhyana, minor samadhi...? 😄

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H Hermes

        This is not a joke Nor a method to become a Practicus in 100 hours 😆

        I heard some say it takes about 100 hours of "meditation" to "charge"properly the energy body. By "meditation", it is meant at least "dhyana" i guess, as they(chinese) say most people will get minutes or even seconds only per hour of practice. Thus the need for many people to meditate everyday for 20 years or 5 years very seriously to get those 100 hours that grant the level i guess corresponds to Practicus in that regard, basically being ready to master kundalini.

        Does this seem to you some thing of good accuracy?!

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jim Eshelman
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        There is no relationship between this and the A.'.A.'. grade of Practicus.

        For example, there is nothing in the A.'.A.'. system that guarantees anything close to a cumulative 100 hours of meditation by that point.

        Since you interpreted this as dhyana, I can add that this is nothing leading one to necessarily expect any dhyana before Dominus Liminis.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • H Hermes

          This is not a joke Nor a method to become a Practicus in 100 hours 😆

          I heard some say it takes about 100 hours of "meditation" to "charge"properly the energy body. By "meditation", it is meant at least "dhyana" i guess, as they(chinese) say most people will get minutes or even seconds only per hour of practice. Thus the need for many people to meditate everyday for 20 years or 5 years very seriously to get those 100 hours that grant the level i guess corresponds to Practicus in that regard, basically being ready to master kundalini.

          Does this seem to you some thing of good accuracy?!

          H Offline
          H Offline
          Hermes
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Thanks. I'm getting more and more sure there is no point in comparing methods seriously without being an adept of each one separately. I see you're always very careful and rigorous Jim, even when we are speaking of straight well known western systems, and more so when they are less known. I get this at least. 🆒

          I apologize if i asked redundant style of questions.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups