True Will
-
@Fra.'. SPQR said
"
@Fra.'. SPQR said
"The fact is becoming attached to the notions of having, wanting to find and carry out a divine-dictated purpose in life jeopardizes a successful passage through the abyss."@Jim Eshelman said
"Which, however, almost nobody will encounter in their present incarnations."
How times have changed. In Thien Tao Crowley alluded it would take an A.'.A.'. Aspirant ten years to become a Magister Templi; and at that period he wasn't at all confused in the differences between a Magister Templi and a Zelator Magister Templi."
And in the Constitution of the Order of Thelemites he put a formal qualification that a minimum of 11 years must pass between becoming an Adept and becoming a Master. And you can easily find other statements that appear to contradict both of those. He was inconsistent and was feeling his way through as he went.
I'm only saying that, in reality, that's a stage of growth that the vast majority of people in the world (99%+) simply won't reach in their present lifetime. I'm not even saying they couldn't - I really have no way of saying with certainty whether they could or couldn't - I'm only saying they won't.
The Next Step for humanity at this point in species progress is to attain to the Knowledge and Conversation of the Holy Guardian Angell In the lifetimes of those currently living, it isn't even likely that a majority - let along "most" - will attain even to this step, though there has been a really definite acceleration of this that can be observed in recent decades.
"What are you, writing on behalf of an A.'.A.'. lineage, saying, exactly?"
I'm making an observation that likely will be fairly plain to most readers. Most people in the world won't even attain that beauteous state that is five grades prior to, and a quantum leap removed from, the one to which you refer. This can be observed pretty easily.
My statement that "almost nobody will encounter [the 8=3 grade] in their present incarnations" is a mathematical statement. There are currently 6.66 billion people in the world (no joke - see www.ibiblio.org/lunarbin/worldpo for a current estimation clock), so even 1% is 66.6 million. Unless you expect that 66.6 million of the people currently alive will attain, in their present lifetimes, not only to the Knowledge & Converation of the Holy Guardian Angel (5=6) but to a full Crossing of the Abyss and resting within the City of the Pyramids (8=3), then it is fair statement that "almost nobody" will encounter that experience in their present incarnation.
-
A nitpick from someone with nothing better to do right now:
One per cent of 6.66-trillion is 66.6-billion, not 666-billion.
Which is not to say it isn't a really big number.
Edward
-
@Edward Mason said
"A nitpick from someone with nothing better to do right now:
One per cent of 6.66-trillion is 66.6-billion, not 666-billion.
Which is not to say it isn't a really big number."
Thanks for the catch. I'm going back to edit the original.
-
@Jim Eshelman said
"There are currently 6.66 trillion people in the world"
You mean 6.66 billion, don't you?
Dan
-
That's what I get for rushing to get out the door. Thanks, all. Math corrected in the original.
-
<deleted>
-
"You and Jim may remain without a modicum of intellectual integrity, but do me this favor: Don't expect me to play along with the solar return sing-song, because to my death I wont. I'll call the b.s. out as I see it, irrespective of the simplistic, empty quips and noise (which includes silence) to my signal."
Apart from its being needlessly discourteous and carrying a sense of ego-inflation, this paragraph is baffling to me. What do you mean by 'play along with the solar return sing-song" ?
Edward
-
93,
If I may digress from the main topic of this thread for a moment... I would like to address the question of etiquette.
A large number of Thelemites seem to have interpreted "Do what thou wilt" as a license to behave without thought or consideration. Apparently manners are considered "un-Thelemic." On the contrary, I would argue that manners are useful tools for Thelemites.
What is the purpose of etiquette? I would describe it as twofold: firstly, etiquette allows persons who may have differing or even opposing views or interests to interact with each other, learn from each other, negotiate with each other, and even work with each other. Without the "social lubricant" of etiquette, discussion of difficult topics and issues would be impossible. The annoyance factor would quickly outweigh the benefits of discussion and social congress would end.
Secondly, etiquette is a social marker that proves one worthy of reciprocal respect and consideration. By behaving in a "noble" fashion, with the sort of restraint and generosity that kings would employ, one indicates that one is a person of quality and discipline, and worthy of respect. Think of the movie "Kingdom of Heaven" (if you have seen it). Leaving aside historical considerations, remember the noble bearing of Balian, King Baldwin, and Saladin. Also remember the boorish antics of Guy de Lusignan. Leaving historical considerations aside, which characters seemed more regal, more deserving of respect?
Some Thelemites may make the mistake of thinking that manners are the same as "making nice," and may confuse etiquette with obedience to authoritarian controls. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Etiquette is a tool that will allow you to pursue your True Will, whatever that is, without losing forward momentum to friction. What moves faster through the air; an arrow, or a cardboard box? The arrow offers no resistance to the world around it except at its one point of Will. It is also possible to remain polite while not being nice at all, as numerous movie villains have shown us.
By rude behavior, you may lose the good will of those who might be in a position to help you later. You never know when you might need someone. Don't throw away good will without good cause.
93 93/93
Anna -
93,
Anna has made a lot of good points. I would like to just add one more, which is that no one has a clue as to what you are communicating when you talk of intellectual dishonesty and solar whatever.
The purpose of your postings is communication with others, isn't it?
I am interested in why you thought that somehow Jim and others are perpetuating some sort of fraud. If you provide the context of your remarks, I would appreciate it. I would also like to add that I am only studying Thelema and not, as yet, a Thelemite. I like JAE and Zeph, but not just everyone. Crowley's work is fascinating and beautiful, though.
Thanks,
chrys333