Tarot

[Surgo]

@Jim Eshelman said

"
@Surg said
"Well, I can't see a hexagram here, regardless of how I bend my mind."

I'm puzzled... it isn't that difficult. It is clearly a hexagram (thoough, admittedly, the lower point is more implied than stated... much like instruction from The Hierophant).
"

Verily. Up to the point that I seem entirely blind to it.

@Jim Eshelman said

"
The think I think you are missing is that it isn't the number of points, but other things like the number of degrees in each angle. Those are not at all 72° angles (as they would be with a pentagram. They are very close to 60° angles (as they are in a hexagram).
"

Can be, but we're talking about penta and hexa grams, which are about the number of lines, not the angles, as shown by the large pentagram encompassing the figure of the Hierophant.

@Jim Eshelman said

"

"Besides, the inner pentagrams wouldn't fit if it was a hexagram."

On the contrary: An important key to understanding The Hierophant is the coexistence of the 5 and the 6. (It's even in the basic numeric patterns of the card: Atu 5, letter value 6 - as you later noted.)
"

Agreed, however that is a pattern that follows throughout the cards, and I have mostly noticed it between the card numbers and hebrew letters, rarely finding them in the illustrations. A very prominent example is The Emperor, IV/90 => square, or tetrahedron.

@Jim Eshelman said

"

"Bottom line: there is no hexagram on the card, period."

You're quite funny The geometry is emphatically that of a hexagram."

Not so. There is a descending triangle, agreed, but for all I know (and that's not very much) it's mostly about attainment (Adeptus Minor) and descent back into matter from there. But hey, what do I know? I'm not even close to being an adept yet.

[Avshalom Binyamin]

I would agree that it is a pentagram (the two pairs of lines at the bottom of the card will meet in the two legs of the pentagram). But I would also agree that the way it's stretched clearly implies a hexagram. The downward triangle is equilateral, as it would be for a hexagram, and if you gaze at the card at arms length, the gestalt impression is of a hexagram with an unfinished bottom.

[Bereshith]

Is that a scepter or a sword that she's got? The bottom looks like a sword, but if so, then the hilt seems impractical, and she'd be holding it by the blade. I can't tell.

Either way, the original sub-topic is really about whether or not Mr. Duquette was phoning it in when he wrote that hexagram bit about the Hierophant in * Understanding Aleister Crowley's Thoth Tarot*.

I don't think so. I think he was simplifying very complex symbolism. Maybe it was written so simply as to confuse the reader. But we have not been simple about it, and it has required many words and abstruse concepts even to debate. That's the kind of thing that turns beginners off. So to me, it seems like a choice, and the choice makes sense.

Surgo - I think you should reconsider your vehement rejection of the book. But if not, then we'll simply disagree.

Welcome to the forum...

[Bereshith]

Flashlight. Definitely a flashlight...

[Uni_Verse]

While the presence of a regular hexagram is debatable, the implication is most assuredly there.

[Macsen Melinydd]

@Dar es Allrah said

"So from one perspective - that of the outward appearance - the hexagram is implied by the apparent marriage of creative fire and watery equilibrium by the robes of the Priest and Priestess, but the symbol shown on the card suggests the more fundamental relationship is between Spirit and Water. Or perhaps Spirit in the Act of Creativity - appearing fiery, united with Spirit in the Act of Equilibrium, and appearing watery, as befits a universal solvent?"

Thanks, Dar.

[Uni_Verse]

The arrangement of the hexagram brings this to my mind:

The water triangle, completed:
What descends from above;
Which can only ever equal,
The Flame within

[Heru]

@Bereshith said

"I think perhaps you are missing the artist's intent. "

The description of the Hierophant from the 1942 exhibition catalogue (written by Harris herself) - complete with three pentagrams.

"..... The pentagram with a point upwards and the dancing child shows that he has the heart of a child; in the reversed pentagram the meaning seems to suggest he has dominion through will; the final pentagram again points upwards, showing his acceptance of a governing cosmic law. ...."

[Bereshith]

While I accept literalists as brothers, I refuse to argue with them about abstract and symbolic art.

[Jim Eshelman]

@Bereshith said

"While I accept literalists as brothers, I refuse to argue with them about abstract and symbolic art."

[Zalthos]

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

@Surg said

"Bottom line: there is no hexagram on the card, period."

By my own estimation, there's an apparent hexagram here, but the traditional fire triangle has been replaced by the top point of a larger pentagram reaching outside the frame of the card (mostly below it). The pitch of the angle suggests this, as its the same as the inner upright pentagram with the child in it. The four cherubic, elemental points of the larger pentagram are, again, outside of the frame of the card. The highest horizontal line of this larger pentagram might be seen if it weren't for the robes of the Hierophant.

Aside from all that, what's interesting to me is bottom point of the proper water triangle is touching the apex of another polygon.

Love is the law, love under will.