Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∴A∴
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

Abysmal Math

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Qabbalah
5 Posts 2 Posters 184 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    BlasphemousTruth
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    ((56 × 11) + 50) ÷ 2 = ((32 × 10) + 3) + 10

    56 = Day (יום)
    11 = Feast (חג)
    56 × 11 = 616 = The Law (התורה)

    "A feast every day in your hearts in the joy of my rapture!" - AL 2:42
    "I will praise thee, O LORD, among the people: and I will sing praises unto thee among the nations." - Psalms 108:3

    50 = Gates of Understanding
    50 + 616 = 666 = The Gold of Solomon (1 Kings 10:14)

    "For he is ever a sun..." - AL 1:16

    2 = Duality = 1+1
    Thus: 333+333 = 666

    ...

    "...solve the first half of the equation, leave the second unattacked." - AL 1:56

    B U 4 Replies Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    BlasphemousTruth
    replied to BlasphemousTruth on last edited by
    #2

    P.S. Choronzon = 333 = 9 vs. Choronzom = 323 = 8 👽

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    Uni_Verse
    replied to BlasphemousTruth on last edited by
    #3

    If it were an equation, there would be no reason to look into the second half, as it would be the same as the first.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • B Offline
    B Offline
    BlasphemousTruth
    replied to BlasphemousTruth on last edited by
    #4

    @Uni_Verse said

    "If it were an equation, there would be no reason to look into the second half, as it would be the same as the first."

    The second half is mathematically equal to the first, so it is an equation.

    Any thoughts on the qabalistic significance of the structure of this equation?

    p.s. I must admit that my use of "AL 1:56" was half in jest and half an excuse for me to not bother explaining what I don't quite understand as well as the first part. That being said; I would welcome any critiques, interpretations, opinions and the like in regards to the equation.

    Love is the law, love under will.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • U Offline
    U Offline
    Uni_Verse
    replied to BlasphemousTruth on last edited by
    #5

    Nu, by Magick and Gates,is divided for Loves' sake!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups