True and False, the mystic of Asisa
-
www.youtube.com/watch?v=qr_nGAbFkmk
=> (not-2) Actors are underpaid...
This is The First Theorem of Thelema:
Give actors more money(element Kristen&Leo - Logic: the riddle can be solved with
Time = Money
For Gods out of of our Sphere like Adonai
-
www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EQMVTTW1Sk
O my God, this sounds terrible
(c) Liber "What fit, that fit <=> D")
So:
Nihil fit sine causa => Quid pro Quo <=> Ex falso quodlibet
=> Hilary Duff"
Principle of explosion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Ex falso quodlibet)"So Hilary Duff is the Theorem?
-
@Asisa said
"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2EQMVTTW1Sk
O my God, this sounds terrible (c) Liber "What fit, that fit <=> D")
So:
Nihil fit sine causa => Quid pro Quo <=> Ex falso quodlibet
=> Hilary Duff"
Principle of explosion
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Ex falso quodlibet)"So Hilary Duff is the Theorem?"
With Aleister says:
Why not...?
I am Chasing the Sun/Son (e) AL(Secret door for Aleister: Hilary Duff has a Soul, so she is not important...
And we have to find the next possible Soul, which could be Asisa...
-
@Hermitas said
"I'm sorry, Asisa, but all of this is unintelligible.
I'm afraid I can't play along. I don't think anyone understands it."
The difference between Asisa and Crowley is, that
if you want to understand Crowley, it has to be done ca. (see Liber Laplace Deamon and his "God") like this:
(AND)logic
It is done quickly; yea, the seal is set upon the vault.
There is one that shall avail to open it.
Nor by memory, nor by imagination, nor by prayer, nor by fasting, nor by scourging, nor by drugs, nor by ritual, nor by meditation; only by passive love shall he avail. (c) PANSo Crowley just look into your heart and decide, if you are a chosen one... But this is (e) Crowley logic, so in the words of a fool:
Crowley decides, if he like you or not, and when he like you, he "talk" to you...Asisa is just pure Logic with
NL e NL <=> Hadit-Riddle... thats all...But the understanding of Asisa is only possible after the understanding of Crowley.. This is so, because Logic (e) Reality and Crowley (e) Crowley
And Asisa (e) Hadit-Riddle...-I think-
-
@Asisa said
"
But the understanding of Asisa is only possible after the understanding of Crowley.. This is so, because Logic (e) Reality and Crowley (e) Crowley
And Asisa (e) Hadit-Riddle...-I think-"But at the end, Crowley just wanted, that you know him better...
The "Snake" (e 65) above (so(logic)) quote=Asisa above is understandable for somebody, who can't "connect" the words, like this:"
[131]
61ฮฮฮฆฮฮฮ ฮฮ THE FOOL'S KNOTO Fool! begetter of both I and Naught, resolve this
Naught-y Knot!
O! Ay! this I and O-IO!-IAO! For I owe "I"
aye to Nibbana's Oe.(28)
I Pay-Pรฉ, the dissolution of the House of God-
for Pe comes after O-after Ayin that triumphs
over Aleph in Ain, that is O.(29)
OP-us, the Work! the OP-ening of THE EYE!(30)
Thou Naughty Boy, thou openest THE EYE OF
HORUS to the Blind Eye that weeps!(31) The Up-
right One in thine Uprightness rejoiceth-Death
to all Fishes!(32) [132]
COMMENTARY (ฮฮ) "When you don't know him, you think "hรค?"
But when you understand him, you say,
So you are talking about the alphabeth,
Okay, I help you,
it is OPQRS , so P comes after O is true (for you, because (you(e)you) is True!So this is true for you and me, but I don't know, for whom else (<=>
Talking with Books^^) -
@Hermitas said
"I fear people won't be polite to you forever.
Engaging in normal conversation without trying to prove the worth of all this formula and such would go better for you. You are not required to be super special."
No, I try to explain the solution IN MY WAY!
That means, you can listen or not...
But I try to
tried to write "Frank and Asisa" in here!Hope this was a true sentence for Aleister
thx, rachel....
could be a possible solution in the modal logic, but in Reality,