The one thought of Adonai in Liber 65
-
@Hermitas said
"Many are not satisfied with something so subjective."
I didn't make the riddle, dude, I just try to solve it...
And when you really want to solve the riddle, you have to understand every single sentence in his Libers in pub. A.
And if you do that, you are "black" (See Liber 65), because you know also the (secret) "barren words" written by Aleister, in which the Libers and many "Beetles" (small hints) in his other Libers refers...Anyway, there are visibly two, who know the-this-of-that (& where the secret barren words are), Me and Aleister, so its not subjective anymore... Because a "Subjective point of view" is always just the point of view of one person
A Propos, "ONE" has three letters.... That was probably also a reason (!!!), why he made three Magicians in his Tarot...
-
-
I would translate this so:
@Hermitas said
"I D33d A77 D33z "
I deed all deeds,
@Hermitas said
" 577vff5 2,2 mang."
577vff5 Be, Be mang.
looks like a secret... but the solution of Aleister is not in it... I checked that^^
@Hermitas said
"
And so did that guy, and this woman, and hir too.
""We" just want to build an order, an believe in the power of "our" God 418...
Okay, the "mystical" Aeon has past away...
Now I will check, if Aleister is right... Let's see, if his Liber65 are true...The member "seekinghga" is now the master of the temple... I have given him the secret words...
And I am the scribe and found nothing in the river "nay"... I tried all the Gods I adore, and sacrificed them in the Nay and none of my Gods can speak my language, they only stutter...
So I demand by you, See-king-hga to show me the right river, that I can partake and be one of those of "Wise"...@Hermitas said
"
But not this one or that other one.So..."
"The Bridge of the other secret is very strange. I can say, it is mathematical not true, so false, but it is possible and used by Maths to find the primes, the secret towers of the numbers.
(All this refers to the smooth point of his libers) -
-
@Hermitas said
""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.
I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.
So... I don't know what to tell you."
Fush yoo!
-
@Hermitas said
""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.
I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.
So... I don't know what to tell you."
[QUOTE]
[Frank-html="Liber10"] We shall bring you to Absolute Truth, Absolute Light, Absolute Bliss.
Many adepts throughout the ages have sought to do this; but their words have been perverted by their successors, and again and again the Veil has fallen upon the Holy of Holies. [/Frank-html]Okay, I try my best:
Liber Nihillis-Logic
NL e NL- (NL element NL)
- propositional logic
- C := "Ex falso quodlibet"
- C := A (o) B (Operation (mathematics))
- C := True
- C := yea
not (yea) := All textes written - without- the textes written by Aleister Crowley!
So: not (yea) = not true = false.
Reason: (R = Set (mathematics) R <=> Russell's paradox <=> i = i+1)
Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley
AND(logic)
Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley<=> True <=> Hadit Riddle...
Now you understand
-
@Takamba said
"
@Hermitas said
""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.
So... I don't know what to tell you."
Fush yoo!
"
We therefore who are without the chains of ignorance, look closely into the heart of the seeker and lead him by the path which is best suited to his nature unto the ultimate end of all things, the supreme realization, the Life which abideth in Light, yea, the Life which abideth in Light.
(Liber10 = LiberX)
-
93,
Asisa these posts bring me endless joy
Please continue to shed these pearls of wisdom like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One that us mere mortals may partake of the influence of the highest.
These revelations have been of unparalleled utility in my life and your straightforward, easy to understand explanations are a boon to all whose eyeballs light upon them.
93 93/93
-
@Frater AOV said
"93,
Asisa these posts bring me endless joy
Please continue to shed these pearls of wisdom like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One that us mere mortals may partake of the influence of the highest.
These revelations have been of unparalleled utility in my life and your straightforward, easy to understand explanations are a boon to all whose eyeballs light upon them.
93 93/93"
Thx, Buddy^^
-
@Asisa said
"
@Hermitas said
""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.
So... I don't know what to tell you."
"
[Frank-html="Liber10"] We shall bring you to Absolute Truth, Absolute Light, Absolute Bliss.
Many adepts throughout the ages have sought to do this; but their words have been perverted by their successors, and again and again the Veil has fallen upon the Holy of Holies. [/Frank-html]Okay, I try my best:
Liber Nihillis-Logic
NL e NL- (NL element NL)
- propositional logic
- C := "Ex falso quodlibet"
- C := A (o) B (Operation (mathematics))
- C := True
- C := yea
not (yea) := All textes written - without- the textes written by Aleister Crowley!
So: not (yea) = not true = false.
Reason: (R = Set (mathematics) R <=> Russell's paradox <=> i = i+1)
Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley
AND(logic)
Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley<=> True <=> Hadit Riddle...
Now you understand "
"So... My Libers are an Image of Aleister's Libers, because they "say" things, but they don't stutter...
Liber Nihillis-Logic says:
(def. Nihillis-Logic := NL e NL <==> x e x <=> True)Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley <=> true
Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley <=> false
=> not (Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley) <=> true
=> Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley <=> trueSo for Nihillis, it is true that:
Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowleywith the definition of :
not (yea) := All textes written - without- the textes written by Aleister Crowley!You can part all Entities, who can write in Aleister and the Rest and make the Differenz in:
Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley (is true)
Rest (not element) texts of Rest (is false)Because:
R={x : x (not-element) x} then R e R <=> R not-e Rwhen
Rest <=> False <=> not (yea) <=> not Cfollows, that they believe that:
C := "Ex falso quodlibet" is false, and that is logical very very interesting, my dear Nihillis^^ -
So who can solve Liber "write me":
Nihil fit sine causa <=> Quid pro Quo <=>
www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAVrjX3nguQis Felicity Jones &
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGbxmsDFVnE -
@Frater AOV said
"93,
Asisa these posts bring me endless joy
Please continue to shed these pearls of wisdom like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One that us mere mortals may partake of the influence of the highest.
These revelations have been of unparalleled utility in my life and your straightforward, easy to understand explanations are a boon to all whose eyeballs light upon them.
93 93/93"
Mit NL e NL
like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One <=> 9. Ours is the elevenfold reading of the Elevenfold word. (element) Liber Pan
=> these posts bring me endless (e e e)^^
-
None, breathed the light, faint & færy, of the stars, and two.
For I am divided for love’s sake, for the chance of union.
This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all.
For these fools of men and their woes care not thou at all! They feel little; what is, is balanced by weak joys; but ye are my chosen ones.Source Lost
For all e (element) Libers Asisa,
do
e := Leighton Meester
endSet Set ={x : x=R, R <=> Empty Set} <=> "all elements in Li-ber Asisa equal R"
Proof: (Aehhhhm... Hae?) => Liber AHA of Aleister Crowley
So Lua = Luna is true! == Keira KnightleyThis is a great Story too... Hmmm, How would I start this One?
-
@Asisa said
"None, breathed the light, faint & færy, of the stars, and two.
For I am divided for love’s sake, for the chance of union.
This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all.
For these fools of men and their woes care not thou at all! They feel little; what is, is balanced by weak joys; but ye are my chosen ones.Source Lost
For all e (element) Libers Asisa,
do
e := Leighton Meester
endSet Set ={x : x=R, R <=> Empty Set} <=> "all elements in Li-ber Asisa equal R"
Proof: (Aehhhhm... Hae?) => Liber AHA of Aleister Crowley
So Lua = Luna is true! == Keira KnightleyThis is a great Story too... Hmmm, How would I start this One?"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsHR77oQKEY
AND
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jil22M_EISU
IS
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J75EN8kVaUSo OR(logic) =^(set randomly)^= Collin Farell
is equal NONSENSE equal ros in 7th Pan
and rejo-ice rejo-ice on the barren words
for the the The (The = Solution)
of VII =/= 7 =/ 52 = ros
and x=/= aeon anymore
The solution must be found percicely
on ____________________,- I think-
(Here you can write in your name, n-e BLOOD)
To make a Pact with the Nameless God in Liber X
Who is 9=I, the opposite of Pandorra,
Which is Billy in Grey's Anatomie <=> Meredith
Okay, I Try that:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SKtTkxh0jo....Don't Now, if you can Put here:
Billy (e) Meredith AND Billy (n-e) Meredith,But I don't know if it fits for a Paradies of Billy, so...
youtu.be/19Fq-JD_xY4?t=607 - I think-
-
Set Set ={x : x=R, R <=> Empty Set} <=> "all elements in Li-ber Asisa equal R"
Proof: (Aehhhhm... Hae?) => Liber AHA of Aleister Crowley
So Lua = Luna is true! == Keira KnightleyIf that means, that
Keira Knightley <=> NAND,
It would be amazing.... really amazing.... for Keira.... -i think-So
Set Set = NAND
true true = NANDAnd now you see it... This is true... Ufff.... How Amazing for Keira....
(R:Relation:Russell:is True)
So it is just a Opinion of me, Asisa, that I am As Sa(==Keira)
This can only be proofed by Keira herself,
because I am False (e) Asisa Logic....in Short:
I AM NOT KEIRA....AND(logic) i can proof that
-
@Hermitas said
""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.
I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.
So... I don't know what to tell you."
Done!
Now what shall we do next?
Asisa (secretary of the A.A.)