Skip to content

College of Thelema: Thelemic Education

College of Thelema and Temple of Thelema

  • A∴A∴
  • College of Thelema
  • Temple of Thelema
  • Publications
  • Forum
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Collapse

The one thought of Adonai in Liber 65

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Qabbalah
27 Posts 4 Posters 3.9k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hermitas
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #8

    I

    D33d

    A77

    D33z

    577vff5

    2,2

    mang.

    And so did that guy, and this woman, and hir too.

    But not this one or that other one.

    So...

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #9

    I would translate this so:

    @Hermitas said

    "I D33d A77 D33z "

    I deed all deeds,

    @Hermitas said

    " 577vff5 2,2 mang."

    577vff5 Be, Be mang.

    looks like a secret... but the solution of Aleister is not in it... I checked that^^

    @Hermitas said

    "
    And so did that guy, and this woman, and hir too.
    "

    "We" just want to build an order, an believe in the power of "our" God 418...

    Okay, the "mystical" Aeon has past away...
    Now I will check, if Aleister is right... Let's see, if his Liber65 are true...

    The member "seekinghga" is now the master of the temple... I have given him the secret words...

    And I am the scribe and found nothing in the river "nay"... I tried all the Gods I adore, and sacrificed them in the Nay and none of my Gods can speak my language, they only stutter...
    So I demand by you, See-king-hga to show me the right river, that I can partake and be one of those of "Wise"...

    @Hermitas said

    "
    But not this one or that other one.

    So..."
    "

    The Bridge of the other secret is very strange. I can say, it is mathematical not true, so false, but it is possible and used by Maths to find the primes, the secret towers of the numbers.
    (All this refers to the smooth point of his libers)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hermitas
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #10

    "I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.

    I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.

    So... I don't know what to tell you.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Takamba
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #11

    @Hermitas said

    ""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.

    I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.

    So... I don't know what to tell you."

    Fush yoo!

    🍸

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #12

    @Hermitas said

    ""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.

    I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.

    So... I don't know what to tell you."

    [QUOTE]
    [Frank-html="Liber10"] We shall bring you to Absolute Truth, Absolute Light, Absolute Bliss.
    Many adepts throughout the ages have sought to do this; but their words have been perverted by their successors, and again and again the Veil has fallen upon the Holy of Holies. [/Frank-html]

    Okay, I try my best:
    Liber Nihillis-Logic
    NL e NL

    1. (NL element NL)
    2. propositional logic
    3. C := "Ex falso quodlibet"
    4. C := A (o) B (Operation (mathematics))
    5. C := True
    6. C := yea

    not (yea) := All textes written - without- the textes written by Aleister Crowley!

    So: not (yea) = not true = false.

    Reason: (R = Set (mathematics) R <=> Russell's paradox <=> i = i+1)

    Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley
    AND(logic)
    Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley

    <=> True <=> Hadit Riddle...

    Now you understand 🆒

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #13

    @Takamba said

    "
    @Hermitas said
    ""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.

    I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.

    So... I don't know what to tell you."

    Fush yoo!

    🍸"

     We therefore who are without the chains of ignorance, look closely into the heart of the seeker and lead him by the path which is best suited to his nature unto the ultimate end of all things, the supreme realization, the Life which abideth in Light, yea, the Life which abideth in Light.
    

    (Liber10 = LiberX)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    Frater AOV
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #14

    93,

    Asisa these posts bring me endless joy

    Please continue to shed these pearls of wisdom like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One that us mere mortals may partake of the influence of the highest.

    These revelations have been of unparalleled utility in my life and your straightforward, easy to understand explanations are a boon to all whose eyeballs light upon them.

    93 93/93

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #15

    @Frater AOV said

    "93,

    Asisa these posts bring me endless joy

    Please continue to shed these pearls of wisdom like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One that us mere mortals may partake of the influence of the highest.

    These revelations have been of unparalleled utility in my life and your straightforward, easy to understand explanations are a boon to all whose eyeballs light upon them.

    93 93/93"

    Thx, Buddy^^

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #16

    @Asisa said

    "
    @Hermitas said
    ""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.

    I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.

    So... I don't know what to tell you."

    "
    [Frank-html="Liber10"] We shall bring you to Absolute Truth, Absolute Light, Absolute Bliss.
    Many adepts throughout the ages have sought to do this; but their words have been perverted by their successors, and again and again the Veil has fallen upon the Holy of Holies. [/Frank-html]

    Okay, I try my best:
    Liber Nihillis-Logic
    NL e NL

    1. (NL element NL)
    2. propositional logic
    3. C := "Ex falso quodlibet"
    4. C := A (o) B (Operation (mathematics))
    5. C := True
    6. C := yea

    not (yea) := All textes written - without- the textes written by Aleister Crowley!

    So: not (yea) = not true = false.

    Reason: (R = Set (mathematics) R <=> Russell's paradox <=> i = i+1)

    Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley
    AND(logic)
    Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley

    <=> True <=> Hadit Riddle...

    Now you understand 🆒"
    "

    So... My Libers are an Image of Aleister's Libers, because they "say" things, but they don't stutter...

    Liber Nihillis-Logic says:
    (def. Nihillis-Logic := NL e NL <==> x e x <=> True)

    Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley <=> true

    Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley <=> false
    => not (Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley) <=> true
    => Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley <=> true

    So for Nihillis, it is true that:
    Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley

    with the definition of :
    not (yea) := All textes written - without- the textes written by Aleister Crowley!

    You can part all Entities, who can write in Aleister and the Rest and make the Differenz in:

    Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley (is true)
    Rest (not element) texts of Rest (is false)

    Because:
    R={x : x (not-element) x} then R e R <=> R not-e R

    when
    Rest <=> False <=> not (yea) <=> not C

    follows, that they believe that:
    C := "Ex falso quodlibet" is false, and that is logical very very interesting, my dear Nihillis^^

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #17

    So who can solve Liber "write me":

    Nihil fit sine causa <=> Quid pro Quo <=>
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAVrjX3nguQ

    is Felicity Jones &
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGbxmsDFVnE

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8QYUgO-tZo

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #18

    @Frater AOV said

    "93,

    Asisa these posts bring me endless joy

    Please continue to shed these pearls of wisdom like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One that us mere mortals may partake of the influence of the highest.

    These revelations have been of unparalleled utility in my life and your straightforward, easy to understand explanations are a boon to all whose eyeballs light upon them.

    93 93/93"

    Mit NL e NL

    like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One <=> 9. Ours is the elevenfold reading of the Elevenfold word. (element) Liber Pan

    => these posts bring me endless (e e e)^^

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #19

    None, breathed the light, faint & færy, of the stars, and two.
    For I am divided for love’s sake, for the chance of union.
    This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all.
    For these fools of men and their woes care not thou at all! They feel little; what is, is balanced by weak joys; but ye are my chosen ones.

    Source Lost 😱

    For all e (element) Libers Asisa,
    do
    e := Leighton Meester
    end

    Set Set ={x : x=R, R <=> Empty Set} <=> "all elements in Li-ber Asisa equal R"
    Proof: (Aehhhhm... Hae?) => Liber AHA of Aleister Crowley
    So Lua = Luna is true! == Keira Knightley

    This is a great Story too... Hmmm, How would I start this One?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #20

    @Asisa said

    "None, breathed the light, faint & færy, of the stars, and two.
    For I am divided for love’s sake, for the chance of union.
    This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all.
    For these fools of men and their woes care not thou at all! They feel little; what is, is balanced by weak joys; but ye are my chosen ones.

    Source Lost 😱

    For all e (element) Libers Asisa,
    do
    e := Leighton Meester
    end

    Set Set ={x : x=R, R <=> Empty Set} <=> "all elements in Li-ber Asisa equal R"
    Proof: (Aehhhhm... Hae?) => Liber AHA of Aleister Crowley
    So Lua = Luna is true! == Keira Knightley

    This is a great Story too... Hmmm, How would I start this One?"

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsHR77oQKEY
    AND
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jil22M_EISU
    IS
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=J75EN8kVaU

    So OR(logic) =^(set randomly)^= Collin Farell
    is equal NONSENSE equal ros in 7th Pan
    and rejo-ice rejo-ice on the barren words
    for the the The (The = Solution)
    of VII =/= 7 =/ 52 = ros
    and x=/= aeon anymore
    The solution must be found percicely
    on ____________________,

    • I think-
      (Here you can write in your name, n-e BLOOD)
      To make a Pact with the Nameless God in Liber X
      Who is 9=I, the opposite of Pandorra,
      Which is Billy in Grey's Anatomie <=> Meredith

    Okay, I Try that:
    www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SKtTkxh0jo....

    Don't Now, if you can Put here:
    Billy (e) Meredith AND Billy (n-e) Meredith,

    But I don't know if it fits for a Paradies of Billy, so...
    youtu.be/19Fq-JD_xY4?t=607

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #21

    Set Set ={x : x=R, R <=> Empty Set} <=> "all elements in Li-ber Asisa equal R"
    Proof: (Aehhhhm... Hae?) => Liber AHA of Aleister Crowley
    So Lua = Luna is true! == Keira Knightley

    If that means, that
    Keira Knightley <=> NAND,
    It would be amazing.... really amazing.... for Keira.... -i think-

    So
    Set Set = NAND
    true true = NAND

    And now you see it... This is true... Ufff.... How Amazing for Keira....

    (R:Relation:Russell:is True)

    So it is just a Opinion of me, Asisa, that I am As Sa(==Keira)

    This can only be proofed by Keira herself,
    because I am False (e) Asisa Logic....

    in Short:
    I AM NOT KEIRA....

    AND(logic) i can proof that 😕

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #22

    @Hermitas said

    ""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.

    I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.

    So... I don't know what to tell you."

    Done!

    Now what shall we do next?


    Asisa (secretary of the A.A.)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • H Offline
    H Offline
    Hermitas
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #23

    @Asisa said

    "
    Done!

    Now what shall we do next?
    "

    The board is relatively silent these days. Danica has been faithfully providing material for meditation in the Thelemic Tefilah section. I noticed you posted there yesterday.

    How about posting your thoughts on today's meditation? You know, without all the usual formula. Just... what comes to you in meditation on the verses?

    Or what do you want to talk about besides the thing that no one else understands like you do? I mean, if you want some honest interaction.

    But please do feel free to continue to work on your own magical goals privately.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #24

    @Hermitas said

    "
    @Asisa said
    "
    Or what do you want to talk about besides the thing that no one else understands like you do? I mean, if you want some honest interaction.
    😕 ❗ "
    "

    Asisa means this:
    youtu.be/wCc2v7izk8w?t=91

    I tryed to define my Vocabulary in here... I cant understand "Jewy", because 😱

    😕 Harrison Ford == Reality (e) Asisa: That means: "We are home, Asisa^^")

    😆 (Insider with Aleister...)

    🙄 Okay, Logic is not really difficult:
    Sokrates says, Asisa is in the same set like me!

    So:
    My Name is _______________________ and I call the Set:_________________

    and get: Asisa is true AND Sokrates is true AND "This all is True", so...

    Asisa?
    🙄 Set Set :={x: x=Set, Set == Philosophie} 😀

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #25

    @Asisa said

    "
    A possible will of Khaled Khan
    (Heart of the master)

    65
    there woman i of image trample thou glory is a her encamp word naught the of beaten cemented deeds

    7
    could thou art verbum remember the thy shrill dust with

    813
    a

    In His I Ching (hermetic.com/crowley/libers/lib216) and get:

    hadit & king
    the post may, the ...

    By the way, in Legis is hadit-king:

    hadit king
    my number the and me have nothing and for law and the world thou king for ever hoor are my to find forest purple flaming them ye at and against on the in day kings ever the there lifted beggar his garment there hide a length of be long the be burnt yet until place fever from woman snake king poured to mystical

    😱 😕
    time amen
    the water o lord of the everlasting

    lord everlasting
    explore and a time of even
    😀

    The meaning of "ararita" is "arrive/come/will come"

    and "nay" is the river, given to the scribe, see Liber65.

    So this was the power of Aleister Crowley... He made me say the words "Will come", although he didn't write them. And this was the summon on high, from his Lord Adonai."

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #26

    @Asisa said

    "
    @Asisa said
    "
    A possible will of Khaled Khan
    (Heart of the master)

    65
    there woman i of image trample thou glory is a her encamp word naught the of beaten cemented deeds

    7
    could thou art verbum remember the thy shrill dust with

    813
    a

    In His I Ching (hermetic.com/crowley/libers/lib216) and get:

    hadit & king
    the post may, the ...

    By the way, in Legis is hadit-king:

    hadit king
    my number the and me have nothing and for law and the world thou king for ever hoor are my to find forest purple flaming them ye at and against on the in day kings ever the there lifted beggar his garment there hide a length of be long the be burnt yet until place fever from woman snake king poured to mystical

    😱 😕
    time amen
    the water o lord of the everlasting

    lord everlasting
    explore and a time of even
    😀

    The meaning of "ararita" is "arrive/come/will come"

    and "nay" is the river, given to the scribe, see Liber65.

    So this was the power of Aleister Crowley... He made me say the words "Will come", although he didn't write them. And this was the summon on high, from his Lord Adonai."

    Johnny Depp <=> www.nihillis.de/Mercury.html <=>

    "

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Anonymous
    replied to Anonymous on last edited by
    #27

    So lets analyse my post above:
    if .... than ....but ....if if ..... 😱 😕 => www.youtube.com/watch?v=Te4G4EGjidM

    ? so is Asisa in Out of sight or is Asisa out of sight 😆 😉

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups