Order, Value, & Symbols of the English Alphabet

Frater SOL

"Thou shalt obtain the order & value of the English Alphabet; thou shalt find new symbols to attribute them unto." - CCXX, II:55

Was this accomplished through Liber Trigrammaton?

Jim Eshelman

@Arsihsis said

""Thou shalt obtain the order & value of the English Alphabet; thou shalt find new symbols to attribute them unto." - CCXX, II:55

Was this accomplished through Liber Trigrammaton?"

No. Those were Crowley doodles. He abandoned them soon after. Attempts to build on that are bogus.

There are different views on this. Mine are given here:
aumha.org/arcane/ccxx2.htm#55

Frater SOL

@Jim Eshelman said

"
@Arsihsis said
""Thou shalt obtain the order & value of the English Alphabet; thou shalt find new symbols to attribute them unto." - CCXX, II:55

Was this accomplished through Liber Trigrammaton?"

No. Those were Crowley doodles. He abandoned them soon after. Attempts to build on that are bogus."

XXVII was doodles, or Crowley's comments thereon were?

@Jim Eshelman said

"There are different views on this. Mine are given here:
aumha.org/arcane/ccxx2.htm#55"

thanks Jim ...checking that out now.

Jim Eshelman

@Arsihsis said

"XXVII was doodles, or Crowley's comments thereon were?"

LOL. His marginalia notes. (Hardly deserves the title "comments.")

Frater SOL

@Jim Eshelman said

"
@Arsihsis said
"XXVII was doodles, or Crowley's comments thereon were?"

LOL. His marginalia notes. (Hardly deserves the title "comments.")"

At what point did he abandon those notes? ...I have found some interesting proofs using chronological number assignments to the letter ordering displayed in his notes.

Does the fact that he abandoned it prove it bogus? ...he abandoned Liber L for a time as well...