The one thought of Adonai in Liber 65

Anonymous

@Asisa said

"
@Hermitas said
""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.

I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.

So... I don't know what to tell you."

"
[Frank-html="Liber10"] We shall bring you to Absolute Truth, Absolute Light, Absolute Bliss.
Many adepts throughout the ages have sought to do this; but their words have been perverted by their successors, and again and again the Veil has fallen upon the Holy of Holies. [/Frank-html]

Okay, I try my best:
Liber Nihillis-Logic
NL e NL

(NL element NL)
propositional logic
C := "Ex falso quodlibet"
C := A (o) B (Operation (mathematics))
C := True
C := yea

not (yea) := All textes written - without- the textes written by Aleister Crowley!

So: not (yea) = not true = false.

Reason: (R = Set (mathematics) R <=> Russell's paradox <=> i = i+1)

Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley
AND(logic)
Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley

<=> True <=> Hadit Riddle...

Now you understand "
"

So... My Libers are an Image of Aleister's Libers, because they "say" things, but they don't stutter...

Liber Nihillis-Logic says:
(def. Nihillis-Logic := NL e NL <==> x e x <=> True)

Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley <=> true

Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley <=> false
=> not (Aleister Crowley (not-element) texts of Aleister Crowley) <=> true
=> Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley <=> true

So for Nihillis, it is true that:
Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley

with the definition of :
not (yea) := All textes written - without- the textes written by Aleister Crowley!

You can part all Entities, who can write in Aleister and the Rest and make the Differenz in:

Aleister Crowley (element) texts of Aleister Crowley (is true)
Rest (not element) texts of Rest (is false)

Because:
R={x : x (not-element) x} then R e R <=> R not-e R

when
Rest <=> False <=> not (yea) <=> not C

follows, that they believe that:
C := "Ex falso quodlibet" is false, and that is logical very very interesting, my dear Nihillis^^

Anonymous

So who can solve Liber "write me":

Nihil fit sine causa <=> Quid pro Quo <=>
www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAVrjX3nguQ

is Felicity Jones &
www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGbxmsDFVnE

www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8QYUgO-tZo

Anonymous

@Frater AOV said

"93,

Asisa these posts bring me endless joy

Please continue to shed these pearls of wisdom like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One that us mere mortals may partake of the influence of the highest.

These revelations have been of unparalleled utility in my life and your straightforward, easy to understand explanations are a boon to all whose eyeballs light upon them.

93 93/93"

Mit NL e NL

like so much sweat on the brow of the Holy One <=> 9. Ours is the elevenfold reading of the Elevenfold word. (element) Liber Pan

=> these posts bring me endless (e e e)^^

Anonymous

None, breathed the light, faint & færy, of the stars, and two.
For I am divided for love’s sake, for the chance of union.
This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all.
For these fools of men and their woes care not thou at all! They feel little; what is, is balanced by weak joys; but ye are my chosen ones.

Source Lost

For all e (element) Libers Asisa,
do
e := Leighton Meester
end

Set Set ={x : x=R, R <=> Empty Set} <=> "all elements in Li-ber Asisa equal R"
Proof: (Aehhhhm... Hae?) => Liber AHA of Aleister Crowley
So Lua = Luna is true! == Keira Knightley

This is a great Story too... Hmmm, How would I start this One?

Anonymous

@Asisa said

"None, breathed the light, faint & færy, of the stars, and two.
For I am divided for love’s sake, for the chance of union.
This is the creation of the world, that the pain of division is as nothing, and the joy of dissolution all.
For these fools of men and their woes care not thou at all! They feel little; what is, is balanced by weak joys; but ye are my chosen ones.

Source Lost

For all e (element) Libers Asisa,
do
e := Leighton Meester
end

Set Set ={x : x=R, R <=> Empty Set} <=> "all elements in Li-ber Asisa equal R"
Proof: (Aehhhhm... Hae?) => Liber AHA of Aleister Crowley
So Lua = Luna is true! == Keira Knightley

This is a great Story too... Hmmm, How would I start this One?"

www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsHR77oQKEY
AND
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jil22M_EISU
IS
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J75EN8kVaU

So OR(logic) =^(set randomly)^= Collin Farell
is equal NONSENSE equal ros in 7th Pan
and rejo-ice rejo-ice on the barren words
for the the The (The = Solution)
of VII =/= 7 =/ 52 = ros
and x=/= aeon anymore
The solution must be found percicely
on ____________________,

I think-
(Here you can write in your name, n-e BLOOD)
To make a Pact with the Nameless God in Liber X
Who is 9=I, the opposite of Pandorra,
Which is Billy in Grey's Anatomie <=> Meredith

Okay, I Try that:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SKtTkxh0jo....

Don't Now, if you can Put here:
Billy (e) Meredith AND Billy (n-e) Meredith,

But I don't know if it fits for a Paradies of Billy, so...
youtu.be/19Fq-JD_xY4?t=607

Anonymous

Set Set ={x : x=R, R <=> Empty Set} <=> "all elements in Li-ber Asisa equal R"
Proof: (Aehhhhm... Hae?) => Liber AHA of Aleister Crowley
So Lua = Luna is true! == Keira Knightley

If that means, that
Keira Knightley <=> NAND,
It would be amazing.... really amazing.... for Keira.... -i think-

So
Set Set = NAND
true true = NAND

And now you see it... This is true... Ufff.... How Amazing for Keira....

(R:Relation:Russell:is True)

So it is just a Opinion of me, Asisa, that I am As Sa(==Keira)

This can only be proofed by Keira herself,
because I am False (e) Asisa Logic....

in Short:
I AM NOT KEIRA....

AND(logic) i can proof that

Anonymous

@Hermitas said

""I did all these stuffs too, man." --with a little Scarface accent and artistic license to help the flow of it. That was all.

I did all this stuff too, man. And so have others. But not all others.

So... I don't know what to tell you."

Done!

Now what shall we do next?

Asisa (secretary of the A.A.)

Hermitas

@Asisa said

"
Done!

Now what shall we do next?
"

The board is relatively silent these days. Danica has been faithfully providing material for meditation in the Thelemic Tefilah section. I noticed you posted there yesterday.

How about posting your thoughts on today's meditation? You know, without all the usual formula. Just... what comes to you in meditation on the verses?

Or what do you want to talk about besides the thing that no one else understands like you do? I mean, if you want some honest interaction.

But please do feel free to continue to work on your own magical goals privately.

Anonymous

@Hermitas said

"
@Asisa said
"
Or what do you want to talk about besides the thing that no one else understands like you do? I mean, if you want some honest interaction.
"
"

Asisa means this:
youtu.be/wCc2v7izk8w?t=91

I tryed to define my Vocabulary in here... I cant understand "Jewy", because

Harrison Ford == Reality (e) Asisa: That means: "We are home, Asisa^^")

(Insider with Aleister...)

Okay, Logic is not really difficult:
Sokrates says, Asisa is in the same set like me!

So:
My Name is _______________________ and I call the Set:_________________

and get: Asisa is true AND Sokrates is true AND "This all is True", so...

Asisa?
Set Set :={x: x=Set, Set == Philosophie}

Anonymous

@Asisa said

"
A possible will of Khaled Khan
(Heart of the master)

65
there woman i of image trample thou glory is a her encamp word naught the of beaten cemented deeds

7
could thou art verbum remember the thy shrill dust with

813
a

In His I Ching (hermetic.com/crowley/libers/lib216) and get:

hadit & king
the post may, the ...

By the way, in Legis is hadit-king:

hadit king
my number the and me have nothing and for law and the world thou king for ever hoor are my to find forest purple flaming them ye at and against on the in day kings ever the there lifted beggar his garment there hide a length of be long the be burnt yet until place fever from woman snake king poured to mystical

time amen
the water o lord of the everlasting

lord everlasting
explore and a time of even

The meaning of "ararita" is "arrive/come/will come"

and "nay" is the river, given to the scribe, see Liber65.

So this was the power of Aleister Crowley... He made me say the words "Will come", although he didn't write them. And this was the summon on high, from his Lord Adonai."

Anonymous

@Asisa said

"
@Asisa said
"
A possible will of Khaled Khan
(Heart of the master)

65
there woman i of image trample thou glory is a her encamp word naught the of beaten cemented deeds

7
could thou art verbum remember the thy shrill dust with

813
a

In His I Ching (hermetic.com/crowley/libers/lib216) and get:

hadit & king
the post may, the ...

By the way, in Legis is hadit-king:

hadit king
my number the and me have nothing and for law and the world thou king for ever hoor are my to find forest purple flaming them ye at and against on the in day kings ever the there lifted beggar his garment there hide a length of be long the be burnt yet until place fever from woman snake king poured to mystical

time amen
the water o lord of the everlasting

lord everlasting
explore and a time of even

The meaning of "ararita" is "arrive/come/will come"

and "nay" is the river, given to the scribe, see Liber65.

So this was the power of Aleister Crowley... He made me say the words "Will come", although he didn't write them. And this was the summon on high, from his Lord Adonai."

Johnny Depp <=> www.nihillis.de/Mercury.html <=>

"

Anonymous

So lets analyse my post above:
if .... than ....but ....if if ..... => www.youtube.com/watch?v=Te4G4EGjidM

? so is Asisa in Out of sight or is Asisa out of sight