@Lucian Accendus said
"I gave up the rosicrucian system in favor of the ogdoadic, about a year ago. As of late, I've given up all magick in a sort of yoga retirement, with the aim of practicing this tradition until I get a sign to resume my magical works."
The only ogdoadic material I'm familiar with is Dennings & Phillips' Aurum Solis. Is it really so different? I bought Foundations of High Magic because it was super-cheaply discounted, but I never looked at Mysteria Magica, which is I guess is the best work. Anyway, aside from being Greek-oriented it didn't seem very different.
I just began reading The Greek Qabalah by Kieren Barry, btw. Very interesting! In the intro, the author explains immediately that the title "Greek Qabalah" is anachronistic, but the Greek number-letter system that came to be used in Jewish Qabalah dates back to Greek culture 3rd century C.E. or earlier, which is coicidentally when the Old Testament is approximated to begin being written between 300 - 600 C.E. Of course, it doesn't make much difference to me either way because I've been working under the premise that it all comes from the Egyptian Ha-Qabal, anyway.
I'd be interested to know more about the differences of the two systems from your personal experience in a PM or something, if you care to bother.