@Jim Eshelman said
"
This question, with which you ended, is another way of asking the following:
"Why should I act in a way that makes me effective in my life and takes me down paths I choose to follow, instead of choosing behaviors that will sabotage me?"
For most people, this is a practical question - effective life management - not a human rights question, IMHO.
OTOH, if you want to frame it as a human rights question specifically, then you are adopting the role of other civil rights warriors over the years: You have to be willing to pay the price, whatever it is. The victory in these matters is not necessarily for you, but is especially for those who come after you."
Either way, the connection you're making is understanding the Nuit-side of context.
The idealist, or the less mature, or the ego-attached side of us wants to act as if the reality of context doesn't exist. And that side feels deprived of comforting illusions when faced with the task of letting those go to be replaced with "the needs of the situation".
IMHO the joy and luxury described in TBOTL is about the stuff we get to experience and share in (not possess!) once we let go of attachment to the idea of possessing joy and luxury on our individual terms.